AIM ACT Information Manager User Meeting: Tips, Training - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

AIM ACT Information Manager User Meeting: Tips, Training

Description:

EM OBJECTIVE: Building Campus coalitions through the use of data to drive Strategic Investments ... Beginner and Refresher Sessions will start Fall 2006 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: DarrowZei3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AIM ACT Information Manager User Meeting: Tips, Training


1
AIM ACT Information Manager User MeetingTips,
Training Best PracticesThe UMR Perspective
AIM User since 2002ACT Enrollment Planners
Conference Pre-ConferenceDowntown Marriott,
Chicago, ILJuly 19, 2006
2
Rolla, Missouri In the Middle of Everywhere
  • Population 17,000
  • South-Central Missouri
  • 95 miles to St. Louis
  • 100 miles to Springfield
  • 90 miles to Columbia
  • 35 miles to Ft. Leonard Wood
  • Top 100 U.S. Small Towns
  • Not Overly Diverse
  • White persons 93.2
  • African American 1.5
  • American Indian and Alaska Native 0.6
  • Asian-American 2.4
  • Not reported 2.3

3
What is UMR?
  • A Top 50 Technological Research University
  • 5600 students 4300 Undergrad, 1300 Graduate
  • 90 majoring in Engineering, Science, Comp. Sci.
  • Ave. Student ACT/SAT upper 8-10 in nation
  • 40 of Freshmen from upper 10 of HS class
  • 24 Out of State Enrollment
  • 96 5 Year Average Placement Rate within 3 months
    of Grad
  • Ave. Starting Salary in 2005 49,300

4
Undergraduate Demographics
  • Average Age 21.6 years old
  • Gender
  • 23 Female
  • 77 Male
  • First Generation College Students
  • 2005-06 37
  • Residency
  • Missouri Residents 76
  • Out-State Students 24
  • Ethnicity
  • African-American 4
  • Asian-American 3
  • Caucasian 83
  • Hispanic 2
  • Native-American 1

5
UMR's Academic Major Distribution by Headcount
6
Life as an Outlier
7
Concerning Student Interest Data
Source ACT 2004
8
Missouris 2004 Student Funnel for All
Engineering Fields
  • High School Seniors 61,378
  • High School Graduates 57,573
  • ACT Testers/College Bound 42,862
  • Any Engineering Interest, all scores 1,599
  • Engineering Interest, 21 comp. score 1,102
  • (21 MO average score / 50)
  • Engineering Interest, 24 comp. score 807
  • (24 UM minimum for auto admission)
  • UMRs Freshmen Engineering Majors 520
  • from Missouri

9
Projected Change in High School
Graduates 2002-2012
9
-17
-11
-20
-4
-10
7
-10
11
-6
-11
4
-2
-22
-2
-1
-3
-8
0
-7
53
-3
10
3
5
7
5
4
-7
3
12
6
-6
-4
3
-10
13
8
20
-8
2
-1
-3
2
16
-1
-12
7
9
9
gt 20 11 to 20 0 to 10 Decreases
-10
STAMATS, 2005 NCES, 2004
10
SOURCE WICHE 2004, KNOCKING AT THE COLLEGE DOOR
11
Enrollment Concerns Challenges in 2000
  • 8 Year Decline New Students (-700 students)
  • 52 Graduation Rate
  • 82 Retention Rate
  • 22 Female Enrollment
  • 4 Traditionally Underrepresented Minorities
  • Only 1 New Degree Program (Computer Engineering)
    added to UMRs Academic Portfolio in close to 15
    years
  • Industry Asking for MORE Graduates
  • Declining Student Interest in Engineering,
    Computer Science, Physics, Chemistry, and Math
  • A Fast Approaching Decline in Midwestern
    College-Bound Students

12
EM Plan Starts with anAssessment of the
Strategic Plan
  • Where are Enrollment Managements 3 Rs
    Marketings 3 Ps ?
  • If they are included in the Strategic Plan,
    determine if the goals were based on desire or
    data.
  • Agreement on Assessment Indicators Must Happen
  • Each indicator must be measurable and addressed
    within the Enrollment Management Plan Quality
    externally verified data is always preferred

13
Tweaking and Implementing the Enrollment
Management Plan
  • Creation of a campus-wide Enrollment Development
    Team
  • Phasing out of previous SEM team
  • Restructuring EM division to include separate
    areas and champions for key Strategic Goals and
    Student Services
  • (New Student Orientation, Diversity Programs,
    Womens Programs, Pre College Programs)
  • Updating and Modifying the SEM strategic plan
  • Creating Research and Assessment positions
    dedicated to enrollment reporting and retention
    research
  • Using marketing research to implement specific
    messages to target audiences
  • Reworking the web
  • Redesigning the visual look and image of UMR
    (Loud and Proud campaign)
  • Re-evaluating the data sources and management
    systems

14
EM OBJECTIVE Building Campus coalitions through
the use of data to drive Strategic Investments
  • Helping a Campus Define Enrollment Priorities
  • Support for new programs
  • a School of Business/business programs
  • Architectural engineering
  • Environmental engineering
  • Biochemical engineering
  • Teacher Education Programs with Math Science
    Focus
  • Technical Communication
  • Interdisciplinary Degrees in Engineering and Arts
    Sciences
  • 17 Graduate Certificates
  • MS in Biology (PhD coming)
  • Assist with Prioritizing New Facilities
  • Residence Halls
  • Student Union
  • Recreational Facilities
  • Wet Lab Building for Biology

15
Impact of a Data-Driven Enrollment Plan
  • AY2005-06
  • 5602 Students
  • 21 increase over the 4626 students in Fall 2000
  • 28 increase in new students since Fall 2000
    (1581 in 2005, 1239 in 2000)
  • Much of our undergraduate growth will now be due
    to increased retention rates. We set all-time
    high retention (87) and graduation rates (64)
    in AY 2005-06
  • 91 of courses taught on-campus
  • 9 of courses taught through distance ed

16
Due to Low Market Interest in STEM Majors, UMR
Embraced a Segmentation and Communication
Strategy to Increase Enrollment by Improving the
Yield of Admitted Undergraduate Applicants who
Enroll
17
UMR ENROLLMENT
18
Enrollment by Academic Quality
19
University of Missouri - Rolla
Geographic Origin of All
Students - Fall 2005
WASHINGTON
35
MAINE
MONTANA
NORTH DAKOTA
MINNESOTA
5
5
OREGON
VT
19
4
2
WISCONSIN
NH
3
IDAHO
14
10
SOUTH DAKOTA
MA
4
14
NEW YORK
4
CT
MICHIGAN
WYOMING
3
21
7
7
PENNSYLVANIA
IOWA
14
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
25
NJ
OHIO
43
IN
6
UTAH
ILLINOIS
2
10
17
5
WV
369
1
COLORADO
VIRGINIA
5
DC 1
10
KANSAS
17
16
MISSOURI
123
KENTUCKY
CALIFORNIA
3875
15
NO. CAROLINA
47
TENNESSEE
4
51
ARIZONA
OKLAHOMA
ARKANSAS
NEW MEXICO
10
72
9
6
MS
GEORGIA
ALABAMA
7
5
23
LA
TEXAS
13
91
2
9
All Students, Totals United States 5,063
Other Countries
539 Total
5,602
  • ALASKA

FL
1
HAWAII
VIRGIN ISLANDS 1
PUERTO RICO 1
Note Geographic Origin is defined as student's
legal residence at time of original admission to
UMR. Source Integrated Postsecondary Education
Data System (IPEDS) frozen files, end of 4th week
of classes.
20
Success in Growing Diversity
21
Improving Student Success
  • Retention Rates 2005
  • General Student Body 87 (82 2001)
  • Female Students 88
  • Minority Students 89
  • CAMPUS GOAL 90
  • Graduation Rates 2005
  • General Student Body 64 (52 2001)
  • Female Students 71
  • Minority Students 60
  • CAMPUS GOAL 70

22
Enrollment Concerns Challenges in 2000
  • 8 Year Decline New Students (-700 students)
  • 52 Graduation Rate
  • 82 Retention Rate
  • 22 Female Enrollment
  • 4 Traditionally Underrepresented Minorities
  • Only 1 New UG Degree Program (Computer
    Engineering) added to UMRs Academic Portfolio in
    about 10 years
  • Industry Asking for MORE Graduates
  • Declining Student Interest in Engineering,
    Computer Science, Physics, Chemistry, and Math
  • A Fast Approaching Decline in Midwestern
    College-Bound Students

23
Enrollment Status Challenges in 2005-06
  • 5 Year Growth Pattern in all Strategic Plan Areas
  • 64 Graduation Rate (UMR Record)
  • 87 Retention Rate (UMR Record)
  • 24 Female Enrollment (230 new students)
  • 5 Year Increase (978 students)
  • New School of Management, 8 new Mission Based
    Degree Programs and 17 Graduate Certificate
    Programs
  • Industry STILL Asking for MORE Graduates
  • FURTHER Declines in Students Interested in
    Engineering, Computer Science, Physics,
    Chemistry, and Math degrees/careers
  • A MUCH FASTER Approaching Decline in Midwestern
    College-Bound Students

24
A Campus-Wide Use Strategyfor AIM EIS
  • Implementation, Training
  • Maintenance

25
2001 EM DATA PROJECT GOAL Give Campus Academic
Units Easy Access to Student Market Data to
Encourage More Active, Data-driven Involvement in
the New Student Recruitment Process
26
CHALLENGES
  • Academic Departments wanted to be more involved
    in the Universitys recruitment efforts, but had
    little direct access to prospective student
    databases.
  • Accessing, segmenting and analyzing prospective
    Student Information and available ACT tested
    student data from the campus ERP was cumbersome
    and virtually impossible for most faculty and
    staff.
  • Buy and implement new data toolsets during a 17
    reduction in operational budgets due to state
    funding reductions

27
Departments wanted a set of easy-to-use tools
for retrieving data and making reports for
  • strategic planning
  • assessing the viability of new majors
  • recruiting new majors
  • awarding of departmental scholarships
  • finding new, market viable majors for UMR
  • measuring future viability of under enrolled
    programs
  • market data for accreditation reports, funding
    proposals new program proposals

28
TOOLSETS CHOOSEN
  • AIM
  • EIS
  • EMT Connect2 (AIM Interface)
  • Online HTML Version of Traditional Admission
    Funnel Reports

29
Strategic Planning Applications EIS AIM
  • Fit Gap Analysis of Academic Program Offerings
  • New Program Student Market Assessments
  • Accreditation and Program Viability Reviews
  • Scholarship and Pricing Strategies
  • Retention Programs and At-Risk Student Assessment
  • Designing and Pricing New Residence Halls
  • Establishing Need for and Designing New
    Recreation Center
  • Assessment of Varsity and Intramural Sport
    Offerings
  • Assessment of Summer Camp Offerings

30
  • Rachel Morris
  • Enrollment Management Data, Reporting
    Technology Coordinator

31
Implementation Strategy How We Got Started
  • Installed AIM EIS in every Admissions
    Recruitment PC (including laptops) and each of
    Deans Offices. After installation provided a
    short overview, and encourage them to play with
    it. Fall 2002
  • Sent email training flyer to all deans, chairs,
    and directors of every campus department. Flyer
    gave a brief overview of what the AIM EIS
    software could do for their departments. (see
    handout)
  • Started scheduling training in January 2003

32
Keys for Training
  • All participants have a laptop
  • The trainer needs an lcd projector and laser
    pointer
  • Try to limit the session to less than 10
    participants
  • Make the group run common queries and reports to
    ensure they understand how to use the program
  • Build in time for each person to play while you
    supervise
  • Send a follow-up email reminding the participants
    to use the program and how receive assistance if
    needed

33
FAQs for Campus Use
  • How does this help with recruitment?
  • Does this replace PeopleSoft data?
  • Why are the AIM student lists different than the
    admitted student lists?
  • Can I break the system or ruin the database?
  • How do you import the updated AIM Data?

34
1 FAQ
  • How do you run reports and get the data out of
    AIM for call lists or mailing lists?

35
CONSTANT REMINDERS ABOUT STUDENT INFORMATION
SECURTY INTEGRITY
  • Please note All student information shared in
    the sessions and via the databases is to only be
    used for legitimate university purposes and
    cannot be shared with outside or unauthorized
    parties. The student information is considered
    confidential and federally protected by the
    Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)
    (20 U.S.C. 1232g 34 CFR Part 99) standards.

36
Maintaining the Toolsets
  • Annually Remind Academic Leaders about the
    availability of the programs and need to install
    software on key faculty PCs
  • Remind the Campus of When to Download Monthly
    Updates of AIM using a shared drive for
    distribution
  • Designing Refresher Courses and Follow-up
    Training is Needed

37
AY2006-07 Training Schedule
  • EIS, AIM, Connect2 Training twice Monthly
  • Beginner and Refresher Sessions will start Fall
    2006
  • Sessions will consist of two 90 Minute Sessions
  • 90 minutes on how to use EIS AIM
  • 90 Minutes on how to use Connect2

38
Questions
Contact Information Jay Goff Dean of Enrollment
Management goffjw_at_umr.edu 573-341-4378 Rachel
Morris Enrollment Management Data, Reporting
Technology Coordinator rachelm_at_umr.edu 573-341-445
2
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com