2nd Amendment Right to Arms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

2nd Amendment Right to Arms

Description:

History of absolute power fear of military power. Britain tried to disarm America. ... they can do as good as pro football player. 2. Militia transformed ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:228
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: richard91
Category:
Tags: 2nd | amendment | arms | army | british | football | history | nd | of | pro | right

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 2nd Amendment Right to Arms


1
2nd Amendment Right to Arms?
  • History of absolute power fear of military
    power.
  • Britain tried to disarm America.
  • We British subjects could not go to our king
    ask for arms to fight him. Thus, citizen militia
    bore burden of arming themselves. Washington
    raised a regular army.
  • Militia fought cowardly in revolution with
    Britain War of 1812. Cincinnatus complex.
    Like citizen bubbas thinking they can do as good
    as pro football player.

2
Militia transformed
  • Washington urged Constitution authors to
    authorize a small professional military in
    Constitution Article 1 did (cant trust citizen
    bubbas with defense of country).
  • But kept authority to call up a citizen militia
    in Constitution.
  • Bill of Rights ratified in 1791 (2nd).

3
2nd Amendment Right to Arms?
  • (Because) A well regulated militia, being
    necessary to the security of a free State, the
    right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall
    not be infringed.
  • Individual rights or collective rights?
  • Republican Chief Justice Warren Burger. Said
    collective rights as has every supreme court
    decision over 2 centuries. Insert because as
    1st word of 2nd Amendment will help citizens
    understand it he said. For a number of reasons,
    he argues that the 2nd will never be useful and
    should be repealed or amended for clarification.

4
Militia defined
  • Militia Act of 1792
  • By 1794, all states required to pass their own
    laws to bring citizen militia in line with
    Federal law. States refused. Why?
  • After War of 1812, due to cowardly performance of
    militias, they would never be used again until
    after 1903.
  • Militia Act of 1903. What is the militia?
  • (Organized reserve organized)

5
2nd Amendment continued ...
  • According to Chief Justice Burger, when is 2nd
    Amendment applicable?
  • (1) to allow government activation of the
    reserve militia, abandoned since 1812, or the
    organized militia
  • (2) When activated, if Federal Government did
    not/would not provide weapons for that reserve or
    organized militia.

6
Supreme Court rulings
  • U. S. v. Cruikshank, 1876 the Force Act of 1870
  • Presser v. Illinois, 1886
  • Miller v. Texas, 1894
  • U. S. v. Miller, 1939

7
What Gun Rights You Have?
  • Citizen gun rights free of government regulation
    control is mainly a legislative right!
  • Citizens who want more gun restriction or less
    should lobby state legislatures and Congress and
    the President.
  • Many do not want criminals and other undesirables
    (like those with mental problems), to legally buy
    firearms over the counter, and possess them,
    especially those deemed dangerous to society.
  • FEDERAL LAW Anyone convicted of many crimes,
    including misdemeanor violence may not possess
    firearms for the rest of his/her life!

8
Search for Truth
  • Think about what happens if you are caught
    violating gun laws.
  • Earth flat? NRA claims individual CONSTITUTIONAL
    gun right free of legal restriction by govt.
    Just not true never has been.
  • Tens of thousands in prison for violating gun
    laws of national, state local govt. Why if
    have constitutional right? Why such laws not
    overturned by Courts?
  • McVea believed govt violated church gun rights
    his misperceptions justified his murders.

9
Heller v. DC
  • Heller v. DC. SC 5-4. DC law stated handguns
    illegal required child safety locks on long
    guns in this federal jurisdiction. SC stated is
    an unconstitutional ban. Handguns are arms
    individuals need them unlocked to protect
    themselves.
  • Reverses a 2 century position (stare decisis) of
    the court that 2nd refers to a military
    organizations - not individual citizens. The
    dissenters said the court's judgment was "a
    strained and unpersuasive reading.

10
McDonald v. Chicago
  • This case challenges a 7th Circuit court ruling
    that said the Second Amendment applies only to
    federal regulation of an individual's right to
    guns, and not in cases of restrictions by states
    and municipalities like Chicago and Oak Park,
    Ill.
  • 5 on the US SC want to re-visit the question of
    incorporation.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com