Dynamic Load Balancing and Channel Allocation in Indoor WLAN - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Dynamic Load Balancing and Channel Allocation in Indoor WLAN

Description:

802.11b (Wi-Fi): extension of 802.11 provides 11 Mbps with a fall back to 5.5, 2, ... 802.11n: build on MIMO offers high throughput of 100-200 Mbps. 10/12/09 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: mhai2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dynamic Load Balancing and Channel Allocation in Indoor WLAN


1
Dynamic Load Balancing and Channel Allocation in
Indoor WLAN
Mohamad Haidar Committee Dr. Hussain
Al-Rizzo Dr. Robert Akl Dr. Haydar
Al-Shukri Dr. Yupo Chan Dr. Hassan
Elsalloukh Dr. Seshadri Mohan
2
Proposal Outline
  • Background
  • Problem Statement
  • Review of Literature
  • Research Objectives
  • Project Plan
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • Questions

3
Background
  • What is WLAN?
  • Flexible data communications system
  • Consists of one or more wireless devices
  • WLAN uses IEEE 802.11 standard
  • Two types of WLAN
  • Ad-Hoc Two or more PCs equipped with wireless
    adapter cards, NO connection to a wired network.
  • Client/Server Multiple wireless devices linked
    to a central hub (AP) which act as a bridge to
    the network resources.

4
Background(continued)
  • Family of WLAN
  • 802.11 1-2 Mbps in the 2.4 GHz band (FHSS or
    DSSS)
  • 802.11a Extension to 802.11 provides up to 54
    Mbps in the 5 GHz band (OFDM)
  • 802.11b (Wi-Fi) extension of 802.11 provides 11
    Mbps with a fall back to 5.5, 2, and 1 Mbps in
    the 2.4 GHz. (DSSS)
  • 802.11g offers transmission of 20-54 Mbps over
    relatively short distances in the 2.4 GHz.(OFDM)
  • 802.11n build on MIMO offers high throughput of
    100-200 Mbps

5
Problem Statement
  • Dynamically balance traffic load on APs and
    minimize channel interferences by assigning
    optimal channels (non-overlapping) to the APs on
    an indoor WLAN.
  • Interferences

Co-channel
Adjacent
6
Literature Review
  • Cellular networks review
  • ILP optimization was used on selecting optimal
    position of BSs in a cellular network 1.
  • Divide and conquer is another optimization
    technique was used to position BSs 2.
  • Dynamic load balancing (channels) was applied in
    cellular networks to reduce call blocking
    probability 3.
  • WLAN review
  • Static
  • AP placement and channel assignment was proposed
    in 4 and 5 using an optimal ILP.
  • Provides best set of AP locations for load
    balancing
  • Constant BW is provided by a channel at an AP
    regardless of the number of users

7
Literature Review (continued)
  • WLAN review
  • Dynamic
  • Dynamic load balancing was ONLY considered by
    8. But did NOT provide reconfiguration of
    channels.
  • Only proposed an approach to minimize traffic
    disruption caused by association or dissociation
    of new nodes to and from their respective APs.
  • Other related work
  • Moving objects, such as people affect the
    performance of the system by introducing large
    variations in the received signal strength 9.

8
Literature Review (continued)
  • Other Related work
  • Without proper consideration of cell locations
    and cell sizes, deployment of high-density WLANS
    might carry significant risk of poor performance.

WHY?
9
Research Objectives
  • Optimize AP selection and traffic allocation
  • Formulate AP placement according to initial
    traffic
  • Optimize dynamic channel allocation
  • Formulate a dynamic optimal channel assignment by
    min. interference between adjacent and co-channel
    APs.

10
Research Objectives (continued)
  • Interference by adjacent and co-channel cells
    should be minimized.
  • A node is considered to be covered by an AP if
    power received from its corresponding AP exceeds
    a certain threshold value.
  • User distribution traffic load will be treated as
    a statistical Poisson distribution (varying
    traffic with time).
  • Propagation mechanisms will be taken into
    consideration
  • For optimal performance of the whole network, a
    centralized decision-making algorithm will be
    implemented.

11
Research Objective (continued)
  • Formulation
  • Objective
  • Minimize congestion at bottleneck APs
  • maxC1, C2, , CM, (1)
  • Where i is the number of APs, j is the number of
    candidate APs and Ci is the congestion factor at
    AP i.
  • The objective function is subject to the
    following constraints
  • (2)
  • Where xij is a binary variable takes the value of
    1 when demand cluster i is assigned to AP j and 0
    otherwise.
  • for j1,,M (3)
  • Where Bj is the maximum bandwidth of AP j, Ti is
    the average traffic load at demand cluster i.
  • Dynamic feature will add the time constraint on
    these equations!

12
Project Plan
  • Phase I
  • Has been started and in progress
  • Some simulations have been conducted using
    available software packages
  • Optimization and Network flow class with Dr. Yupo
    Chan
  • Realistic indoor environments will aid in
    formulating optimization problem

Indoor floor plan using different wall materials,
door way and Tx.
13
Project Plan (continued)
  • Phase II
  • Formulating the optimization problem
  • Apply the formulated problem to realistic
    environments
  • Phase III
  • Dynamic optimization feature will be added.
  • Mobility model will be presented in terms of
    Poisson distribution
  • Several simulations will be carried out under
    different scenarios and constraints.
  • Results will be presented and compared to models
    reported in 4 and 5.

14
Conclusion
  • It is expected that the proposed dynamic traffic
    load-balancing scheme will lead to an effective
    utilization of the channel and an improvement in
    capacity and coverage area of WLAN.
  • Unlike other schemes this dynamic feature will
    strive to give the optimal performance as time
    progresses.

15
References
  1. C. Glaber, S. Reith, and H. Vollmer. The
    Complexity of Base Station positioning in
    Cellular Networks. Workshop on Approximation and
    Randomized Algorithm in Communications Networks,
    March 2000.
  2. E. Yammaz and O. K. Tonguz. Dynamic Load
    Balancing Performance in Cellular Networks with
    Multiple Traffic Types. IEEE Vehicular
    Technology Conference, pages 3491-3495, September
    2004
  3. S. Gordon and A. Dadej. Design of High Capacity
    Wireless LANs based on 802.11b Technology. 6th
    International Symposium on Communications
    Interworking, pages 133-144, October 13-16, 2002.
  4. R. Akl and S. Park. Optimal Access Point
    selection and Traffic Allocation in IEEE 802.11
    Networks, Proceedings of 9th World
    Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and
    Informatics (WMSCI 2005) Communication and
    Network Systems, Technologies and Applications,
    paper no. S464ID, July 2005
  5. Y. Lee, K. Kim, and Y. Choi. Optimization of AP
    placement and channel assignment in wireless
    LANs. LCN 2002. 27th Annual IEEE Conference on
    Local Computer Networks, pages 831-836, November
    2002.
  6. M. Klepal, R. Mathur, A. McGibney, and D. Pesch.
    Influence of People Shadowing on Optimal
    Deployment of WLAN Access Points. IEEE Vehicular
    Technology Conference, pages 4516-4520, 2004.
  7. S. Gordon and A. Dadej. Design of High Capacity
    Wireless LANs based on 802.11b Technology. 6th
    International Symposium on Communications
    Interworking, pages 133-144, October 13-16, 2002.

16
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com