Title: Project 3 (?): Interactions of Landscape Processes within Intensively Managed Watersheds
1Project 3 (?) Interactions of Landscape
Processes within Intensively Managed Watersheds
2Theme 3 Background
- Theme emerges from sustained UIUC and
collaborators interest in IMLs - Possibility of a hydrological observatory aimed
at the Illinois River Basin
3Theme 3 Rationale
- Many landscapes in the US and elsewhere have been
extensively modified by human activity - Transformation of land-cover conditions has
dramatically altered hydrological, ecological
geomorphological and biogeochemical processes
compared to pre-settlement conditions - Altered processes in turn have produced
environmental problems of societal importance,
including exacerbated flooding, degradation of
water quality, threats to ecosystems, and
enhanced rates of erosion and sedimentation - A holistic approach to the management of these
problems requires understanding of interactions
among various landscape processes - Thus far, most research has involved
disciplinary studies aimed at individual problems
and processes (e.g. flooding and accelerated
runoff), rather than integrated investigations of
process interconnections .
4Theme 3 Research Questions
- How do anthropogenic changes in landscape
heterogeneity and watershed processes alter the
dynamic regimes of the coupled physical-ecological
-biogeochemical systems at different scales? - How do key drivers such as changes in land-use
change and climate influence the magnitude and
frequency characteristics of hydrological,
ecological, biogeochemical and geomorphological
processes? - How sensitive are sediment and biogeochemical
fluxes to hydrologic and land-cover changes
associated with agricultural land use and
urbanization? - How do variability and changes in water quality,
water quantity, and sediment fluxes impact
aquatic habitats and ecosystem functions? - What variables are important for the prediction
of interacting processes in the water cycle for
different regions, and what levels of
predictability can be attained given the
uncertainty of process understanding, the
heterogeneity of process dynamics, and the
complexity of interacting processes?
5My Research Interests
- Geomorphology of river systems in intensively
managed landscapes - Dynamic interactions among flow, sediment
transport and channel form - How dynamic interactions are related to aquatic
habitat and fish communities - Management, naturalization and restoration of
river systems in IMLs
6Sediment Dynamics in Intensively Managed
Landscapes
- Issues of
- Scale
- Anthropogenic Influence
- Connections to Hydrological, Biogeochemical, and
Ecological Processes
7Sediment Dynamics in Intensively Managed
Landscapes
- Scaling Issues
- Move beyond basin sediment delivery ratio
- SDR yield/production
- Event-based modeling perspective
- Lu et al. 2005 A theoretical exploration of
catchment sediment delivery accounts for
stores, fluxes of sediment from hillslopes and
channels in relation to event timing, magnitude
and duration - Can be cast in spatially distributed form
- Emphasizes event conditioning how parts of a
sediment system are prepared to respond to an
event and how each part contributes to the
overall response - Hot spots, hot times, thresholds, and external
controls
8Sediment Dynamics in Intensively Managed
Landscapes
Anthropogenic influences in IRB
Low-relief glaciated terrain Predominate land
use is row-crop agriculture High-density
urbanization within Chicago metro area
9Anthropogenic Influences Vary with Scale
Headwaters Scale Drainage Area 1 100
km2 Channelized Tile Drainage Periodic
Maintenance Flanked by farm fields or narrow
grass buffer Flashy Hydrologic Regimes
Erosionally Stable High Nutrient and Fine
Sediment Loads Storage of coarse load
10Major Tributary Scale Drainage Area 100 - 1000
km2 Actively Meandering (Bank Erosion) Flanked by
farm fields or narrow riparian corridor No Tile
Drainage Inputs Has higher nutrient and sediment
loads, flashier hydrological response, and
carries greater runoff volume than prior to
settlement May contain low-head dams or
water-supply reservoirs
11Illinois River Main Stem Drainage Area 10,000
km2 Not actively meandering, experiencing net
sedimentation Flanked by bottomland wetlands
within an incised, ancestral glacial drainageway
Regulated by navigation locks and dams Sediment
delivery higher and hydrological regime less
variable than prior to settlement Floodplain
groundwater regime influenced strongly by
hydraulic gradients from surrounding bluffs
12Sediment Dynamics Research Questions
- How are fluxes of sediment (wash load, suspended
load, and bedload) at various scales within
watersheds related to spatial and temporal
variability in hydrological processes, especially
the magnitude, sequencing and spatial extent of
hydrological events? - How sensitive are sediment fluxes to hydrological
and land-cover changes associated with
agricultural land use and urbanization, and how
does this sensitivity vary with the type and
intensity of land-use change, with geological
materials, and with watershed topography? - What inertial lags exist between the material
fluxes of the hydrological and sedimentary
systems and how are these lags manifested through
sediment storage/mobilization within fluvial
systems? How might anticipated changes in
climate influence these inertial lags? - How are changes in sediment fluxes linked to
spatial and temporal patterns of stream-channel
and floodplain erosion/deposition throughout
watersheds? What influence have changes in the
form and dynamics of stream channels and
floodplains associated with human manipulation of
fluvial systems and with changing sediment fluxes
had on physical habitat and the characteristics
of riparian/aquatic ecosystems? - What coupling exists among hydrological,
biogeochemical and sediment fluxes at various
scales within watersheds?
13Sediment Dynamics Grand Challenge
- Lack of Appropriate Data!!!