Improving the competitiveness of the North East companies by implementing lean manufacturing using change agents - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Improving the competitiveness of the North East companies by implementing lean manufacturing using change agents

Description:

Productivity (GVA per job) vs. Participation (jobs per population of working age) ... Group 3: (4 automotive companies) 3 were aware of lean manufacturing. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: nch88
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improving the competitiveness of the North East companies by implementing lean manufacturing using change agents


1
Improving the competitiveness of the North East
companies by implementing lean manufacturing
using change agents
  • Colin Herron, One NorthEast
  • Chris Hicks, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
    Business School

2
Productivity (GVA per job) vs. Participation
(jobs per population of working age) - 2003
3
NE sectoral performance, sector growth and
regional significance
Increasing manufacturing productivity is a
regional priority
4
North East Productivity Alliance (NEPA)
  • The aim is to increase productivity by
    transferring lean manufacturing from the
    automotive industry to other sectors.
  • Methodology based upon Nissan/Industry Forum
    supplier development initiatives.
  • This paper reports on 30 interventions at 15
    companies.

5
The transfer of management innovations from Japan
(Lillrank, 1995)
Losses occur during technology transfer
6
The NEPA framework for transferring lean
manufacturing
NMUK /IF
Companies
NEPA
Japan
Abstraction of lean practices
Application of lean practices
Losses occur during each stage of technology
transfer
7
Status at end of first year
  • Group 1 (5 companies) - no practical knowledge
    of lean. Quite problematic, required the most
    support and made the slowest progress.
  • Group 2 (4 companies) - about to embark on, had
    a change in management and a strategy. These
    companies made good progress a with capable
    change agents supported by dynamic management.
  • Group 3 (4 automotive companies) 3 were aware of
    lean manufacturing. They became the most
    problematical because they overestimated their
    capabilities and they were resistant to outside
    thinking.
  • Group 4 (2 companies) - aware of lean
    manufacturing, but they did not know how to
    introduce it. One company was very successful,
    whereas the other was virtually unchanged.

8
Conclusions
  • Manufacturing productivity particularly important
    in the North East.
  • Productivity was lower than achieved by Japanese
    companies due to transmission losses.
  • Total savings to date are 4.36 million with an
    average saving per intervention of 149,000.
  • With the Industry Forum evaluation method, which
    ignores the highest an lowest cases the average
    saving was 106,000
  • Total returns were eight times the cost.
  • NEPA supported lean manufacturing are an
    effective way of addressing regional productivity
    problems.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com