Big Brother Goldfish - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Big Brother Goldfish

Description:

Big Brother Goldfish. By Team LaLa. Introduction ... The types of fish we are working with are common species of goldfish for example ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:133
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: linco9
Category:
Tags: big | brother | fish | goldfish | lala | rachael | tanks | uk

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Big Brother Goldfish


1
(No Transcript)
2
Big Brother Goldfish
  • By Team LaLa

3
Introduction
  • Our project is about goldfish which were first
    bred by the Chinese over 4500 years ago and
    introducing in Britain in the early eighteenth
    century.
  • The types of fish we are working with are common
    species of goldfish for example the comet and
    veiltale. Their ages vary between 14-16 years of
    age and they eat specialist goldfish food. These
    type of fish are bottom feeders therefore have to
    have a filter in their tank.

4
Introduction
  • Goldfish do not get pregnant. The female releases
    thousands of eggs into the water for the male to
    fertilise. He will chase her around the tank
    whilst this is happening which could last up to
    three to four hours.
  • When the eggs are laid and fertilised they must
    be removed to prevent the parents from eating
    them.

5
Aim
  • Our aim for this project was to find out if
    goldfish prefer to spend more time in an enriched
    or a featureless environment.
  • In this experiment the enriched environment
    contained plenty of artificial weed to provide
    cover, whereas the featureless environment
    contained none.

6
Hypothesis
  • variables
  • The water temperature
  • The food given to the fish
  • The light
  • Us, i.e. our presence, and we will make a bit of
    noise
  • invariables
  • The types of fish in the tank
  • The different ages of the fish
  • The different abilities of the fish (e.g. one
    fish could be blind and not notice the plastic
    predator
  • Some fish may be slower swimmers and want to stay
    in the weed

7
Materials and methods
  • Materials
  • Fish, tank (inc. filter, oxygen, lights etc),
    scary stimuli (inc. plastic fish),
    grid, 2 cameras- link up, artificial plants,
    stopwatch
  • Method
  • First we had a bare tank leaving the fish to
    adjust.
  • Then we added in some artificial plants in
    different sections having an enriched area
    (filled with artificial plants) then a bare area,
    enriched area and then bare area.
  • We set up the cameras, one at a side view and one
    above the tank, to help us to see the fish to
    count them.
  • We filmed the fish for 10 minutes
  • Every 30 seconds we recorded how many fish were
    in each section
  • We repeated this process to get repeat results
  • We presented a scary stimuli into the water of
    each of the 4 sections in turn for 5 minutes
  • Every 30 seconds we recorded how many fish were
    in each area
  • We then repeated this to get repeat results.

8
Our Scarer!
9
Fish Scaring..
10
Results first experiment
11
  • The first results indicate
  • That the fish preferred the non-weeded sections
    of the tank, in particular one end of the tank.
    This may be due to recently disturbed food debris
    in these areas, or a preferred temperature.

12
Results scaring experiment
13
  • Although the fish still seemed to prefer the
    non-weeded areas when exposed to the scarer,
    there was an increase in mean number of fish in
    the weeded areas. This may be because
  • They prefer weed for security, cover and
    protection

14
Discussion
  • After doing our experiment we discovered that the
    fish didnt respond very well to the stimuli.
  • Reasons for this may be The fish may have been
    used in this or similar tests before
  • All of the fish were quite old and used to being
    handled, meaning that they may be more difficult
    to scare.

15
Summary
  • We split the tank into four different sections.
    Two of the sections were enriched whilst the
    other two were left plain.
  • We counted how many fish where in each section
    during 10 minutes to see which they preferred.
  • We then placed plastic predators in each section
    for five minutes to see what the fish did.
  • We found from the first experiment that our fish
    prefer non-weeded areas.
  • In the second experiment the fish also preferred
    the non-weeded areas, however more fish moved to
    the weeded areas than before. This may be because
    they prefer weed for security, cover and
    protection.

16
Evaluation
  • We decided that if we were to do it again we
    would change a few things to make our it more
    accurate.
  • Next time we would.
  • Use nets as scarers. This is because the fish
    are scared of these which would make our results
    clearer.
  • Use younger and more timid fish because they are
    more easily scared.
  • Check temperature of different ends of the tanks
    and any other environmental changes in the
    different ends. This will help us understand why
    fish may prefer different ends of the tank and
    help make our experiment fairer.

17
Thanks To Team LaLa
18
  • Jessica Crofts
  • Faye England
  • Holly Granville
  • Micheala Hare
  • Rachael OSullivan
  • Amita Rana
  • Hayley Smith
  • Leanne Thrower
  • Stacey Weeks-Pearson
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com