Farm animal welfare: a regulatory history - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Farm animal welfare: a regulatory history

Description:

... historically unsupported) founding myths is there any ... eg urban dairies. Eg inter-war progressive' dairying. ii) Intensification & the animal body ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: www2War
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Farm animal welfare: a regulatory history


1
Farm animal welfare a regulatory history
  • Dr Abigail Woods
  • Centre for the History of Science, Technology and
    Medicine
  • Imperial College London

2


The governance of FAW

  • EU
  • Directives
  • Conventions of the council of europe
  • British government
  • 2006 Animal welfare act
  • Voluntary codes of practice
  • FAWC, Animal Health
  • Private
  • farm assurance schemes.

3
The British governments role
  • Key questions
  • How / why / when did it become involved in
    regulating farm animal welfare?
  • What did it think welfare was?

4
Origin storiesThe ancient contract (Rollin)
5
Origin storiesThe rise of welfare (Webster)
  • 1965 Brambell committee
  • 1968 Agriculture Act
  • Welfare standards
  • FAWAC
  • Welfare codes

6
Origin stories
  • See welfare as a fundamentally new concept, that
    arose in the 1960s as a result of intensive
    farming practices, and required new government
    interventions.
  • But all disciplines have their (often
    historically unsupported) founding myths is
    there any truth in this one?

7
A plea for historical continuity
  • The 1968 act and the subsequent welfare codes
    simply extended to farms the type of measures
    laid down in earlier legislation for protection
    of animals in transit.
  • Major change did not take place until c1980 (at
    the earliest).

8
i) The legislative picture
  • By 1960, farm animals protected by a patchwork of
    legislation
  • In public spaces (1822, 1835 1849, 1911)
  • In transit (1869, 1894, 1927, 1950 Acts)
  • At slaughterhouses (1954, 1958)

9
  • In public spaces
  • Included in broader legislation (1911) to prevent
    animal cruelty and avoidable suffering
  • Responsibility of the Home Office Local
    Authorities.

10
  • In transit
  • Provoked by growth in transport, associated
    disease spread and humanitarian concerns
  • Responsibility of state vets Local authorities

11
ii) Intensification the animal body
  • Drive to increase productivity and critique of
    practices date from at least the 19thC
  • eg urban dairies

12
  • Eg inter-war progressive dairying

13
ii) Intensification the animal body
  • Q
  • So why did state-led welfare interventions not
    happen earlier?
  • A
  • Such practices were seen as bad farming
  • State intervention not considered nature would
    restore order, eg by disease.

14
ii) Intensification the animal body
  • Post-WWII
  • New definitions of good and bad farming
  • Changing nature of intensification
  • Larger scale indoor
  • Farm becomes a factory (or a cattle truck?)

15
  • P Brassley, Output and technical change in 20th
    century British Agriculture, Ag Hist Rev 48
    (2000), p62

16
ii) Intensification the animal body
  • Post-WWII new critique
  • No longer expect redress from nature
  • Farmers are harming nature with aid of science
    (Carson, Silent Spring, 1962)

17
ii) Intensification the animal body
  • 1964 Harrisons Animal Machines
  • Not the first critique of factory farming
    but the first to prompt MAFF action
  • unemotional tone
  • attacked MAFF defences.
  • huge publicity
  • political pressure.
  • Officials look to transit regulations for
    inspiration

18
iii) The concept of welfare
  • Pre-1960s, key terms are animal protection,
    cruelty, suffering and humanity
  • Welfare used mainly in relation to welfare
    societies
  • Use of welfare increases early 60s.
  • Enters mainstream following 1964/5 Brambell
    committee inquiry into the welfare of animals

19
iii) The concept of welfare
  • What did it mean?
  • For Brambell committee
  • physical and mental wellbeing
  • For MAFF officials, farmers and many vets
  • the converse of suffering
  • a new name for animal protection

20
iii) The concept of welfare
  • Doesnt the new legislation / codes implement a
    new concept of welfare?
  • Closely resemble transit regulations drawn up
    by the same people (vets).
  • MAFFs legal understanding is that welfare
    absence of unnecessary pain or distress FAWAC
    told to work within this definition.

21
From animal protection to animal wellbeing
  • Driven by Harrison
  • institutionalised by FAWC (1979)
  • Aided by scientific research (Dawkins)
  • Re-iterated by 1980-1 agriculture select committee

22
Conclude
  • The early history of FAW regulation in Britain
    amounted to a re-branding exercise
  • From the protection of animals in transit.to
    the promotion of animal welfare.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com