Validation of SCIAMACHY polarisation using POLDER as a reference bonus: reflectance validation PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 10
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Validation of SCIAMACHY polarisation using POLDER as a reference bonus: reflectance validation


1
Validation of SCIAMACHY polarisation using POLDER
as a reference(bonus reflectance validation)
Tiger Team Meeting 23, SRON, 23 May 2006
2
POLDER
  • imager
  • CCD detector matrix
  • bandfilter carousel
  • wide FOV lens
  • resolution 6 7 km2
  • polarisation at 443,
  • 670, and 865 nm
  • well-calibrated

443, 443, 490, 565, 670, 763, 765, 865, 910 nm
3
Intercomparison SCIAMACHY versus POLDER? look
for collocated data (position, time) with
identical viewing geometry
  • POLDER image (reflectance _at_ 670 nm) previous
    images
  • POLDER viewing angles (in green). In black
    SCIAMACHY nadir pixels of 1.0 s IT
  • POLDER viewing angles for data where the viewing
    geometry is similar to SCIAMACHYs
  • For the same measurement data again the
    reflectance _at_ 670 nm. In white SCIAMACHY nadir
    pixels of 0.25 s IT
  • Data can be compared

4
Reflectance spectral averaging
--- IT 0.25 s --- IT 1.00 s
? transform SCIAMACHY reflectance into 9
broadband values for comparison with POLDER
broadband reflectance measurements
5
Results for the reflectance
(SCIAMACHY s/w version 5.01)
cloudy cloud-free
Cloudy data are less reliable fit results for
cloud-free data Slope ?1 ? (known) calibration
problem of SCIAMACHY
6
Reflectance comparison with other sources
? 1020 error in radiometric calibration.
7
Results (polarisation)
(SCIAMACHY s/w version 5.01)
  • PMD 2 something is wrong, bad correlation
  • PMD 3 looks better, but look at the slope
  • PMD 4 a lot of serious errors
  • polarisation product of bad quality
  • much better than version 4.01, though

water land
? IT 0.25 s
8
PMD 4 simple check
  • zero-point problem
  • unphysical values

? IT 0.25 s
9
Conclusions
  • radiometric calibration SCIAMACHY contains errors
  • reflectance 10-20 too low in visible wavelength
    range
  • for the first time successful polarisation
    intercomparison
  • polarisation errors for PMD 2 and 3
  • polarisation retrieval of PMD 4 is in a very bad
    shape

10
EXTRA SLIDES PMD 4 versus single scattering
value Q/I and U/I
IT 0.25 s
IT 1.00 s
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com