Title: Validation of SCIAMACHY polarisation using POLDER as a reference bonus: reflectance validation
1Validation of SCIAMACHY polarisation using POLDER
as a reference(bonus reflectance validation)
Tiger Team Meeting 23, SRON, 23 May 2006
2POLDER
- imager
- CCD detector matrix
- bandfilter carousel
- wide FOV lens
- resolution 6 7 km2
- polarisation at 443,
- 670, and 865 nm
- well-calibrated
443, 443, 490, 565, 670, 763, 765, 865, 910 nm
3Intercomparison SCIAMACHY versus POLDER? look
for collocated data (position, time) with
identical viewing geometry
- POLDER image (reflectance _at_ 670 nm) previous
images - POLDER viewing angles (in green). In black
SCIAMACHY nadir pixels of 1.0 s IT - POLDER viewing angles for data where the viewing
geometry is similar to SCIAMACHYs - For the same measurement data again the
reflectance _at_ 670 nm. In white SCIAMACHY nadir
pixels of 0.25 s IT - Data can be compared
4Reflectance spectral averaging
--- IT 0.25 s --- IT 1.00 s
? transform SCIAMACHY reflectance into 9
broadband values for comparison with POLDER
broadband reflectance measurements
5Results for the reflectance
(SCIAMACHY s/w version 5.01)
cloudy cloud-free
Cloudy data are less reliable fit results for
cloud-free data Slope ?1 ? (known) calibration
problem of SCIAMACHY
6Reflectance comparison with other sources
? 1020 error in radiometric calibration.
7Results (polarisation)
(SCIAMACHY s/w version 5.01)
- PMD 2 something is wrong, bad correlation
- PMD 3 looks better, but look at the slope
- PMD 4 a lot of serious errors
- polarisation product of bad quality
- much better than version 4.01, though
water land
? IT 0.25 s
8PMD 4 simple check
- zero-point problem
- unphysical values
? IT 0.25 s
9Conclusions
- radiometric calibration SCIAMACHY contains errors
- reflectance 10-20 too low in visible wavelength
range - for the first time successful polarisation
intercomparison - polarisation errors for PMD 2 and 3
- polarisation retrieval of PMD 4 is in a very bad
shape
10EXTRA SLIDES PMD 4 versus single scattering
value Q/I and U/I
IT 0.25 s
IT 1.00 s