Overview of the Latest Scientific Developments on Animal Models and Alternatives - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Overview of the Latest Scientific Developments on Animal Models and Alternatives

Description:

Total number of Procedures in Dogs 7,632 (0.3 ... Applied research in human medicine and dentistry. Applied research in veterinary medicine ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: stellac
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Overview of the Latest Scientific Developments on Animal Models and Alternatives


1
Overview of the Latest Scientific Developments on
Animal Models and Alternatives
  • Dr Philip A Botham
  • Global Head of Human Safety
  • Syngenta

2
Animal Models for What ?
  • Its not just about toxicology / safety evaluation

3
Statistics of Scientific Procedures on Living
Animals Great Britain 2000
  • Total number of Procedures 2,714,726
  • Total number of animals used 2,642,993
  • Total number of toxicology procedures 454,904
    (16.8)
  • Total number of toxicology procedures for
    Cosmetics and Toiletries

    0
  • Total number of acute lethal tests in the rat
    (LD50/LC50) 2292
  • Total number of Procedures in Dogs
    7,632 (0.3)
  • Total number of procedures in primates
    3,690 (0.1)

4
  • The vast majority of animals used in the European
    Union are used in
  • Fundamental biological research
  • Applied research in human medicine and dentistry
  • Applied research in veterinary medicine
  • Breeding programmes, especially for genetically
    modified animals

5
The Use of Animals in Toxicology Mandatory
Tests
  • For all industry sectors (pharmaceuticals,
    agrochemicals, industrial chemicals, cosmetics,
    household products)
  • Regulatory requirements for conducting clinical
    trials, registration, safe manufacture, transport
  • Assess hazard not risk
  • Wide range of complex hazard endpoints (acute,
    chronic, reproductive system, cancer, teratogens,
    sensitisers)
  • New endpoints / tests (nervous system, immune
    function, susceptible human sub-populations, e.g.
    children)

6
The Use of Animals in Toxicology- Elective Tests
  • Compound selection in discovery (active
    ingredient) and formulation (product) development
  • Mechanistic studies are findings seen in
    mandatory tests in rodents / dogs relevant to
    man?
  • Research studies understanding generic
    mechanisms, e.g. how certain chemical classes
    cause cancer

7
Future Trends in Laboratory Animal Use in
Toxicology
  • New toxic endpoints more testing
  • More products of biotechnology / fewer
    traditional chemicals change in testing
    requirements
  • Greater emphasis on understanding mechanism of
    toxicity
  • Relevance of animal models
  • Transgenics (humanisation of models)
  • Use of in vitro and in silico technology
  • Public and regulatory expectation for safer drugs
    pesticides, chemicals and food and for reduced
    animal use.

8
  • Toxicology offers both a threat and an
    opportunity for reduction, refinement and
    replacement alternatives to animal experimentation

9
What Progress Has Been Made ?
  • Replacement
  • Skin corrosion
  • Phototoxicity
  • Skin permeability
  • Refinement / Reduction
  • Acute oral toxicity
  • Skin sensitisation
  • INVENTION TO REGULATORY ACCEPTANCE TOOK 15 20
    YEARS

10
What Tests Are in Development or Validation?
  • Available within 3 years
  • Acute oral toxicity (in vitro
    screening/dose-setting for in vivo studies)
  • Skin irritation (in vitro - replacement)
  • Developmental toxicity (in vitro-screening for
    moderate to strong teratogens)
  • Available within 5 10 years
  • Eye irritation (in vitro replacement)
  • Acute dermal and inhalation toxicity (in vivo
    refinement / reduction)
  • Respiratory sensitisation (in vivo new endpoint)

11
In-Vitro Replacement Tests Available Only in
Longer Term (more than 10 years)
  • Acute toxicity
  • Skin and respiratory sensitisation
  • Kinetics and metabolism
  • Target organ / system toxicity
  • Developmental and reproductive toxicity
  • Non-genotoxic carcinogenesis

12
  • Is this pessimistic or too conservative ?
  • Why does it take so long to develop and validate
    alternatives ?
  • Would more investment in alternatives speed up
    progress ?

13
Stages in the Development of New Toxicology Test
Methods
Stage Outcome Science or Technology
Research Understanding basic toxic or biological mechanisms Science
Method Development New methods for specific applications Science
Pre Validation Optimised transferable protocol Technology
Validation Establishment of reliability and relevance Technology
Review Independent scientific peer review -
Regulatory Acceptance Regulatory agency decision on acceptability for specific application -
14
  • Technology can be driven to a timetable by the
    application of sufficient resources and
    management skills, while science has a pace of
    its own
  • IFH Purchase, 1996
  • Regulatory acceptance also has a pace of its
    own, and is perceived to be driven as much by
    politics as by science
  • PA Botham, 2002

15
(No Transcript)
16
I know, lets invent the Ames test
17
Would More Investment in Alternatives Speed up
Progress ?
  • Yes by giving more support for conduct and
    management of high quality validation
    studies
  • Yes by encouraging test developers to better
    understand the needs for hazard and risk
    assessment in toxicology (more
    collaboration between academics and industry)
  • No by funding poorly conceived or poorly -
    conducted test development

18
Test Development A Current Example of
Expectation Not Matching Reality
  • Genomics, Transcriptomics, Proteomics and
    Metabonomics

19
Genomics, Transcriptomics, Proteomics and
Metabonomics (GTPM)
  • Mechanistic toxicology improve relevance to man
  • Predictive toxicology biomarkers for particular
    toxic endpoints or classes of toxiciant
  • Can be used with in vitro culture systems

20
The Problems with the Development of GTMP
Technology in Toxicology
  • e.g. Using transcriptomics (toxicogenomics)
  • Changes seen genuine adverse effects or healthy
    adaptive or repair responses?
  • Effects seen at very low doses (relevance ?)
  • Generic problems with the use of in vitro culture
    systems
  • Transcript changes may not reflect what would
    happen in an organ in vivo
  • Different microenvironment
  • Lack of cellular interactions
  • Inadequate or inappropriate metabolism

21
  • The appropriate application of these techniques
    is more demanding of careful experimental design
    than ever, as the potential to generate
    incomplete and misleading data is great.
  • The attainment of common ground through
    collaboration involving the generation, sharing
    and publication of suitable, high quality, data
    should be prime goal for scientists and
    institutions engaged in researching the new
    technology and its appropriate application
    towards improving the knowledge of the
    interaction of chemicals with living things.
  • B Pennie, 2001
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com