Title: TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE AND BIOEQUIVALENCE WITH A FOCUS ON ARTEMISININS
1TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD
MANUFACTURING PRACTICE AND BIOEQUIVALENCE WITH A
FOCUS ON ARTEMISININS
- Introduction
- Efficacy and Safety Issues
Hans Kemmler Consultant to WHO White Sands,
23.Aug. 2006
2The Prequalification Project
- The Prequalification project, set up in 2001, is
a service provided by the WHO to facilitate
access to medicines that meet unified standards
of quality, safety and efficacy for HIV/AIDS,
malaria and tuberculosis.
3Overview
- Defining efficacy and safety of a medicine
(finished pharmaceutical product FPP) - Dossier requirements
- Use of guidelines
4Defining Efficacy and Safety
The Clinical Quality of a Medicine
Efficacy and safety of the active ingredient
Information on the appropriate and safe use
Galenical formulation
All aspects are assessed during prequalification
5Efficacy and Safety of the Active Ingredient
- Investigated and documented in preclinical and
clinical trials of possibly different
galenic formulations
6Galenic Formulation
- Has an influence on e.g.
- Bioavailability
- Best active ingredient will be of no use if
contained in a stainless steel capsule - (local) tolerability
Because different formulations can have different
bioavailability or tolerability, the information
about which formulation has been used in which
trial(s) is essential for the assessment of the
FPP.
7Information on the Appropriate and Safe Use
- Best active ingredient in best galenical
formulation will be of no use if used for wrong
condition, e.g. antimalarial used to treat
headache - It will be even dangerous if safety relevant
information is not complete
Information in SPC and PIL must be justified by
and referenced in the documented evidence.
8Dossier requirements
- Manufacturers interested in participating in the
prequalification project have to submit a product
dossier for assessment - The product dossiers have to contain the required
data and information as stipulated in the
Prequalification Project Guidelines (Presentation
Dr. Sterzik) - Guidelines available http//mednet3.who.int/prequ
al/ (all on CD-ROM 1)
9Prequalification Requirements for Finished
Pharmaceutical Products (FPPs)
- Website WHO (http//mednet3.who.int/prequal/defau
lt.htm) - Manufacturers are requested to submit a covering
letter, sample and product dossier (generics --
innovator) including a completed checklist. - Generics If innovators exist and are approved
Bioequivalence study, assessed with WHO Technical
Report 937 WHO EXPERT COMMITTEE ON
SPECIFICATIONS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS
TRS 937 - Innovator What data and information needs to be
submitted in a dossier for an innovator product?
10Artemisinin - Innovators?
- What data and information needs to be submitted
in a dossier for an innovator product? - For innovator products, registered/licensed in
the USA, EU or Japan Submit the following
information - A WHO-type Certificate of a Pharmaceutical
Product issued by one of the regulatory authority
of ICH regions (or other stringent regulatory
authorities), together with the summary of
product characteristics (SmPC) - Assessment report(s) issued by the respective
regulatory authority - ........
- Does not apply to most of FPP for which
Expression of Interest was invited
11Dossier requirements
- Particulars for artemisinin containing FPP
- Note to applicants expressing interest for
supplying artemisinin-containing drug products - Because all products on current Expression of
Interest list are combinations, the consideration
of the combinations guideline is of utmost
importance - Guideline for registration of fixed-dose
combination medicinal products - (WHO Technical Report Series No. 929, 2005)
12Focus of Todays Lectures
- Artemisinins based generics
- Orally applied products on the EoI-List All are
combinations - Artesunate amodiaquine
- Artemether/lumefantrine
- Artesunate mefloquine
- Artesunate sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine
13Wanted for BE-Studies
- A generic FPP
- An acceptable comparator
- BUT Choice of comparator is not trivial
- On WHO-Prequalification Project Website follow
Selection of comparator product Note to
Applicants on the Choice of Comparator Products
for the Prequalification Project (on CD-ROM 1) - One big problem still to be solved Only one of
the combinations is already approved in ICH
region and prequalified Not a topic today
14Use of Guidelines
- Guidelines are guidances, no law
- But
- It should be apparent that the relevant
guidelines are known - deviations from guidelines should be based on
scientific justification - Guidelines make life easier
- especially for applicants
15Use of Guidelines
- No presentation, no training course can help to
avoid the thorough study of guidelines - To find all relevant guidelines is - to some
degree - an art - WHO website provides an excellent starting point
16Where to Find Guidelines
- In previous and following presentations some
references to guidelines are given - in distributed material (CD-ROMs) many more are
included or referenced - see in particular the presentations of the
previous workshop (Kiev, 2005, on CD-ROM 1) for
many additional references in particular relevant
for bioequivalence studies
17Other Useful Documents
- On the accompanying CD-ROM 2 will be a complete
and detailed Table of Contents (TOC) for a
bioequivalence study report - In my opinion, a very valuable help for
scientists intending to conduct such a study - also useful for other study reports to give an
idea about the detailedness of a Full Study
Report
18Other Useful Documents
- Also on CD-ROM 1 Annex 7 (a template)
Presentation of bioequivalence trial
information - Together with the TOC, these documents should, if
properly populated, help to avoid gt90 of
currently encountered deficits in submitted
bioequivalence trials
19Other Useful Documents
- WHO Guidelines for registration of fixed-dose
combination medicinal products !!! (see CD-ROM 1) - Sample analysis for a comparative bioavailability
study (see CD-ROM 2, and general hint If
questions about BE-studies arise, the website of
the Canadian health authority should be one of
the first places to look at)
20Difficulties in understanding
- Delays in prequalification by lack of mutual
understanding - Not only language problems, but
- same words have different meanings for people
with different previous experience e.g.A full
study report is obviously something different
for an European assessor and for an employee of a
Chinese company. This doesnt mean that one is
right and the other not!!!
21Difficulties in understanding
- Talking and asking helps a lot, therefore one of
our intentions for this workshop - Less presentations about something which is
better read anyway - More time for discussion
22Finally The bare necessities
- Apart from the intrinsic efficacy/safety of the
active ingredient, the bioavailability is THE
clinical quality mark of a FPP, therefore - Without pharmacokinetic characterisation in
humans, - either through Phase I Studies for innovators or
through bioequivalence studies for multi-source
products - no Finished Pharmaceutical Product will pass the
prequalification.
23Thank you For inviting usFor listeningFor many
questions