Lexington County School District One District Indicator Report 20052006

1
Lexington County School District One District
Indicator Report2005-2006

• January 2007

2
Key Points

• Growth continues
• Escalating accountability demands
• Increasing poverty index
• Slight slippage in some test scores
• Excellent performance compared to national
  measures
• Strategies to meet new challenges

3
Lexington 1 41.82 York 2 (Clover) 40.9
On appeal
4
(No Transcript)
5
05-06 Excellent
change district criteria
Phase in Science Social Studies
Add Graduation Rate
HSAP for BSAP
Good
Average
6
06-07 Excellent
change high school criteria
change district criteria
Phase in Science Social Studies
Add Graduation Rate
HSAP for BSAP
Good
Average
7
Escalating accountability

• Small fluctuations in test scores.
• The rating will be lowered one level if schools
  do not meet adequate yearly progress (AYP) for
  all students.
• The computations for AYP and report card
  improvement ratings are complex.
• Report card ratings were published in November.

8
Reporting improvement at the top of the range.
Excellent Absolute Rating X 2 years Improvement
Rating of Unsatisfactory is reported as Good.
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
In summary

• The district grew by almost 800 students.
• Performance is good to excellent compared to the
  state and nation, despite escalating
  accountability demands.
• Poverty has increased.
• The district is working to meet new challenges.

39
Priorities to meet the challenges

• High performance learning culture
• Differentiated instructional activities
• Technology infusion
• Response to interventions
• Teacher-led collaborative planning

40
Questions?