A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST

Description:

Elastic Cross Section. World Data. World Unpolarized Data ... Elastic Cross Section. b = target spin angle w/r to the beam line. Asymmetry Super-ratio Method ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: chriscr4
Learn more at: http://www2.lns.mit.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST


1
A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST
  • Chris Crawford
  • MIT Laboratory for Nuclear Science
  • June 7, 2005

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Formalism
  • World Data
  • Experiment overview
  • Experimental Setup
  • LDS polarized target
  • BLAST detector
  • Calibrations
  • Analysis
  • Cuts Yields
  • Asymmetry
  • Extraction of mGE/GM
  • Systematic errors
  • Conclusion
  • Results mGE/GM
  • Separation of GE, GM

3
Introduction
  • GE,GM fundamental quantities describing
    charge/magnetization in the nucleon
  • Test of QCD based calculations and models
  • Provide basis for understanding more complex
    systems in terms of quarks and gluons
  • Probe the pion cloud
  • QED Lamb shift

4
Form Factors of the Nucleon
  • Form Factors
  • Nucleon current

5
Rosenbluth Separation
  • Breit frame
  • Nucleon Current
  • Elastic Cross Section

6
World Data
World Unpolarized Data
7
Polarization Transfer
  • Recoil proton polarization
  • Focal Plane Polarimeter
  • recoil proton scatters off secondary 12C target
  • Pt, Pl measured fromf distribution
  • Pb, and analyzing powercancel out in ratio

8
GE/GM World Data
9
Theory and Models
  • Direct QCD calculations
  • pQCD scaling at high Q2
  • Lattice QCD
  • Meson Degrees of Freedom
  • Dispersion analysis, Höhler et al. 1976
  • Soliton Model, Holzwarth 1996
  • VMD Chiral Perturbation Theory, Kubis et al.
    2000
  • Vector Meson Dominance (VMD), Lomon 2002
  • QCD based constituent quark models (CQM)
  • LF quark-diquark spectator, Ma 2002
  • LFCQM CBM, Miller 2002

Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factors, Haiyan
Gao, Int. J. of Mod. Phys. E, 12, No. 1,
1-40(Review) (2003)
10
Models Consistent with Polarized Data
11
Form Factor Ratio _at_ BATES
  • Exploits unique features of BLAST
  • internal target low dilution, fast spin reversal
  • large acceptance simultaneously measure all Q2
    points
  • symmetric detector ratio measurement
  • Different systematics
  • also insensitive to Pb and Pt
  • no spin transport
  • Q2 0.1 0.9 (GeV/c) 2
  • input for P.V. experiments
  • structure of pion cloud

12
Elastic Cross Section
b target spin angle w/r to the beam line
13
Asymmetry Super-ratio Method
  • Beam-Target Double Spin Asymmetry
  • Super-ratio
  • b 45?

14
Polarized Beam and Target
  • Storage Ring
  • E 850 MeV
  • Imax225 mA
  • Pb 0.65
  • Internal ABS Target
  • 60 cm storage cell
  • t 4.9?1013 cm-2
  • Pt 0.80
  • isotopically pure internal target
  • high polarization, fast spin reversal
  • L 3.1 ? 1031 cm-2s-1
  • H2 98 pb-1 D2 126 pb-12005 run

15
Atomic Beam Source (ABS)
  • Standard technology
  • Dissociator nozzle
  • 2 sextupole systems
  • 3 RF transitions

Spin State Selection
16
Laser Driven Source (LDS)
  • Optical pumping Spin Exchange
  • Spincell design
  • Target and Polarimeter
  • Results

17
Spin-Exchange Optical pumping
Spin Temperature Equilibrium (STE)
18
LDS Experimental Setup
19
Pictures of the LDS
20
Atomic Dissociation
21
Atomic Polarization
22
Comparison of Polarized Targets
23
BLAST Detector Package
  • Detector Requirements
  • Definition of q
  • ??e ? 2?, ??e ? .?, ?z ? 1 cm
  • e/p/n/?? separation
  • PID ?t ? 1?, Cerenkov
  • Optimize statistics
  • Large Acceptance
  • Asymmetry Super-ratios
  • Symmetric Detector
  • Polarized targets
  • 1 m diameter in target region
  • Zero field at target
  • B-gradients ? 50 mG/cm

24
TOF Scintillators
  • timing resolution s350 ps
  • velocity resolution s 1

coplanarity cuts
ADC spectrum
25
Cosmics TOF Calibration
L 15
L 12
channels
L 9
L 6
L 3
L 0
channels
R 0
R 3
R 6
26
TOF Efficiency
green efficiency magenta non-bias red
misses
27
TOF Scintillator Cuts
TOF paddle, proton
TOF paddle, electron
28
Cerenkov Detectors
  • 1 cm thick aerogel tiles
  • Refractive index 1.02-1.03
  • White reflective paint
  • 80-90 efficiency
  • 5" PMTs, sensitive to 0.5 Gauss
  • Initial problems with B field
  • Required additional shielding
  • 50 efficiency without shielding

29
Drift Chambers
  • 2 sectors 3 chambers
  • 954 sense wires
  • 200µm wire resolution
  • signal to noise ratio 201

30
NSED (Online Display)
31
Reconstruction
  • Scintillators
  • timing, calibration
  • Wire chamber
  • hits, stubs, segments
  • link, track fit
  • PID, DST

32
Newton-Rhapson Track Fitter
33
Hyperbolic time?dist function
D
TDC
34
Linear T2D Calibration
72 33
1mm resolution
c2
28 MeV 12 MeV
D p (GeV/c)
35
Wire Chamber Efficiency
36
WC Offsets/Resolution/Cuts
37
Tracking Efficiency
38
Comparison of Yields with MC
39
Experimental Spin Asymmetry
40
i left,right sector j Q2 bin (1..n) b spin
angle
  • Single-asymmetry Method
  • measure P first, use to calculate R
  • model-dependent
  • Super-ratio Method
  • 2 equations in P, R
  • in each Q2 bin j
  • independent measure of polarization in each bin!
  • 2n parameters Pj, Rj
  • Global Fit Method
  • fit for P, R1, R2, from all Aij together
  • model independent
  • better statistics
  • n1 parameters
  • can also fit for b

41
Extractions of m GE/GM
42
Single AsymmetryExtraction
43
Systematic Errors
  • DQ2 (1.8)
  • comparison of qe and qp
  • difference between left and right sectorsmost
    problematic
  • appeal to TOF timing !
  • Db (0.8)
  • fieldmap 47.1 1
  • Hohler 47.5 0.8
  • Fit Method 42 3
  • (1st 7 bins) 48 4
  • T20 analysis 46.5 3

44
GE/GM Results
45
Extraction of GE and GM
46
GE and GM Results
BLAST World Data
47
Q2 Corrections from TOF
48
Conclusion
  • 1st measurement of mGE/GM using double spin
    asymmetry
  • 2 3.5 improvement in precision of mGE/GM at
    Q2 0.1 0.5 GeV2
  • sensitive to the pion cloud
  • is dip in GE around Q20.3 GeV2 real?
  • systematic errors are being reduced
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com