Improving Independence can homecare reablement make a difference in the longer term

1
Improving Independence can homecare re-ablement
make a difference in the longer term?

• Liz Newbronner

2
CSED Homecare Re-ablement Workstream

• 2006 CSED study into the development of homecare
  re-ablement in England
• Working definition of re-ablement used by CSED
• Services for people with poor physical or
  mental health to help them accommodate their
  illness by learning or re-learning the skills
  necessary for daily living
• Study showed that
• 60 CASSR had a homecare re-ablement service of
  some kind
• Characteristics of these services varied
  considerably
• Main distinction was between intake and
  discharge or discharge support services

3
Background to the Study

• Limited evidence base about effectiveness of
  homecare re-ablement
• Indications of reductions in use of homecare
  services following discharge from re-ablement
• But no evidence on
• - longer term duration of reductions
• - factors that impact on subsequent service use

4
Aims of the Study

• 1. To use routine service data from CASSRs to
  examine changes over time in subsequent use of
  social care services following homecare
  re-ablement
• 2. To identify factors that may affect subsequent
  use of social care services following homecare
  re-ablement
• 3. To consider the focus and research design of a
  larger evaluation of homecare re-ablement services

5
Methods

• Selected 4 CASSRs with re-ablement services (2
  intake and 2 discharge) established for at
  least 4 years. In each site
• Analysis of routine data for clients with an
  episode of homecare re-ablement in 2004-5,
  including subsequent social care provision
  (2005-6 and 2006-7)
• Interviews with homecare re-ablement service
  manager and colleagues
• Interviews with one or more care management team
  managers in each site

6
The Study Sites

• Wirral Enablement Discharge Service (WEDS),
  Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council (discharge
  support)
• Homecare Assessment and Re-ablement Team (HART),
  Leicestershire County Council (intake)
• Short Term Assessment and Re-ablement Team
  (START), London Borough of Sutton (primarily
  discharge support)
• Intermediate Home Support Service (IHS), Salford
  City Council (intake)

7
Profile of Re-ablement Service Users

• Four age groups used up to 64 65 to 74 75 to
  84 and 85 and over
• Percentage of service users in each age group
  broadly similar for all four sites
• Longer established services (Leicestershire and
  Sutton) had higher proportion in the 85 and over
  age group
• In all four sites 80 of service users were
  categorised as physical disability, physical
  illness or physical frailty

8
Overall Pattern of Homecare and Re-ablement
Service Use

• Between a third and a half of service users in
  Salford, Leicestershire and Sutton had reablement
  only
• Percentage of users who had re-ablement followed
  by homecare was remarkably consistent across the
  sites at just over 40
• Two most mature services had the greatest
  proportion of service users who had homecare
  before re-ablement

9
Time from Re-ablement to First Episode of Homecare

• Majority of service users who had homecare had
  their first episode within one week of leaving
  re-ablement
• For service users starting homecare later, there
  are two peaks in take up at the up to three
  months point at the over one year point
• Patterns may suggest re-ablement users fall into
  two broad groups
• - those gaining immediate but relatively
  short-term benefit avoiding need for homecare for
  a few months
• - those for whom impact is more sustained and
  which delays the need for homecare by a year or
  more

10
(No Transcript)
11
Change in Homecare Use After Re-ablement

• Examined the changes in the use of homecare after
  re-ablement
• Used snapshot points of 3, 6, 12, 18 24 months
  after re-ablement
• In Leicestershire and Sutton, percentage of
  service users needing less homecare than they did
  on leaving re-ablement increased over the two
  years
• In Salford, percentage of service users needing
  less homecare than they did on leaving
  re-ablement fell after 18 months but percentage
  of service users needing progressively more
  homecare was only slightly higher at end of
  2-year period
• Wirral is very different but still appears to be
  a significant change at the 18-month point

12
Change in homecare use all service users
13
Change in homecare use over 85 age group
Excludes those who died or went into permanent
residential care
14
Intensity of Homecare Use after Reablement

• Examined the intensity of homecare usage after
  re-ablement at the snapshot points of 3, 6, 12,
  18 and 24 months
• Based analysis on hours of homecare categories
  used in HH1 returns (2 hours or less 2-5 hours
  6-10 hours and 10 hours)
• Overall no marked changes in the proportions of
  service users in each category at the different
  snapshot points
• Leicestershire had the smallest proportion of
  users in the more than 10 hours group

15
Factors Affecting the Longer-Term Impact of
Re-ablement

• Independent providers culture and contracting
  arrangements
• Culture
• Staff training
• Time and tasks commissioned
• Contracting system
• Frequency of review
• Re-ablement package duration and flexibility
• Service users understanding and attitudes
• Carers perceptions of risk and on-going support
• Signposting to other services and support
• Culture of re-ablement across social care services

16
Key Lessons for CASSRs establishing Re-ablement
Services

• Staff attitudes, skills and training
• Communicating the re-ablement ethos
• Capacity and throughput
• Flexibility
• Access to the re-ablement service
• Skill mix and relationship to other professionals
• Relationships with carers
• Role in assessment/review
• A whole systems approach

17
Key Lessons for CASSRs establishing Re-ablement
Services

• Staff attitudes, skills and training
• Communicating the re-ablement ethos
• Capacity and throughput
• Flexibility
• Access to the re-ablement service
• Skill mix and relationship to other professionals
• Relationships with carers
• Role in assessment/review
• A whole systems approach

18
Contact Details

• Liz Newbronner liz_at_actonshapiro.co.uk
• Websites www.csed.csip.org.uk
• www.york.ac.uk/spru
• www.actonshapiro.co.uk