Mendelism After 1908 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 98
About This Presentation
Title:

Mendelism After 1908

Description:

Infection of a Red Blood Cell By a Malarial Parasite ... The Sickle Cell Allele is Therefore an Autosomal, Dominant Allele for Malarial Resistance. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 99
Provided by: nslcW
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mendelism After 1908


1
Physical Basis of Evolution
  • DNA can replicate
  • DNA can mutate and recombine
  • DNA encodes information that interacts with the
    environment to influence phenotype

2
Phenotype is any measurable trait.Mendelian
Genotypes Are AlwaysDiscrete, But Phenotypes Can
BeEither Discrete or Continuous.This Presented
A Serious Problemfor Mendelism
3
Genetic Disease in Humans
Category Incidence (Percent of Live Births)
  • Mendelian 1.25
  • Chromosomal 1.65
  • Irregularly Inherited 9.00 (low penetrance,
    interactions with
    environments, oncogenes)
  • Polygenic Traits with h2 gt 0.3 65.41

  • TOTAL 77.31

4
Sickle-Cell Anemia isA Single Locus,
AutosomalRecessive Genetic Disease
But is it?
5
First ComplicationWhich Phenotype and Which
Environment?
6
The Sickle Cell Mutation
7
The Hemoglobin Molecule
8
Sickle-Cell is A Single Locus, Autosomal
Codominant Allele for Eletrophoretic Mobility
9
Allosteric Shifts in Hemoglobin
10
Beta-Hemoglobin S Molecules Can Bond With
Adjacent Alpha-Hb Molecules After Losing O2,
Starting a Polymerization Reaction that forms
long alpha-helices of Hb Molecules. Can distort
cell shape (sickling) and even lyse the cell,
leading to anemia.
11
Sickle-Cell is A Single Locus, Autosomal Dominant
Allele for the Sickling Trait Under the
Environmental Conditions of Low Oxygen Tension
12
The Low O2 Conditions That CanInduce Sickling
Include
  • Loss of Oxygen in Capillaries
  • High Altitudes
  • Pregnancy
  • Infection of a Red Blood Cell By a Malarial
    Parasite

13
Infection of a Red Blood Cell By a Malarial
Parasite
  • Sickle-Cells Are Filtered Out Preferentially by
    the Spleen
  • Malaria Infected Cells Are Often Filtered Out
    Because of Sickling Before the Parasite Can
    Complete Its Life Cycle
  • The Sickle Cell Allele is Therefore an Autosomal,
    Dominant Allele for Malarial Resistance.

14
Loss of Oxygen in Capillaries
  • Capillaries Only Allow 1 Red Blood Cell To Pass
    At a Time
  • Sickling Is More Extreme in SS Homozygotes
  • Extremely Deformed Sickle Cells Often Cannot Pass
    Through the Capillary, Causing Local Failures of
    Blood Supply
  • Extremely Deformed Sickle Cells Often Burst

15
The SickleCell Anemia Phenotype
16
Sickle-Cell Allele is An Autosomal Recessive for
the Phenotype of Hemolytic Anemia
17
Most Deaths Due to Sickle Cell Anemiaand Due to
Malaria Occur BeforeAdulthood. Viability Is The
Phenotypeof Living To Adulthood
  • In a non-Malarial Environment, The S Allele is a
    Recessive Allele For Viability Because Only the
    Homozygotes Get Sickle Cell Anemia.
  • In a Malarial Environment, The S Allele is an
    Overdominant Allele For Viability Because Only
    the Heterozygotes Are Resistant to Malaria And Do
    Not Get Sickle Cell Anemia.

18
Dominance, Recessive, etc. Are Not Properties of
Alleles But Refer to Genotype to Phenotype
Relationships in an Environmental Specific Fashion
Viability in a non-malarial region
High
High
Low Because Of Anemia
A is dominant S is recessive
Viability in a malarial region
Low Because Of Malaria
High
Low Because Of Anemia
A is overdominant S is overdominant
19
Second ComplicationInteractions With Other
Genes?
20
Gene Duplication Followed By Divergence Yields
Families of Functionally Related Genes
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Genetic Backgrounds of the S Allele
24
Genetic Backgrounds of the S Allele Other Loci
25
The Sickle-Cell Allele is Necessary But Not
Sufficient for Sickle Cell Anemia Because of
Epistasis With Several Other Loci
  • Sickle-Cell Anemia is Therefore a Polygenic,
    Complex Genetic Disease

26
The Confoundment of Frequencyand Apparent
Causation inSystems of Interacting Factors
27
Phenylketonuria
28
p/p fetus develops in Low Phenylalanine in utereo
Environment
Normal Diet
Mentally Retarded
Low Phenylalanine Diet
Normal Intelligence
p/p Baby Born With Normal Brain
p/p Mother Creates Low Phenylalanine in utereo
Environment
29
p/p fetus develops in High Phenylalanine in
utereo Environment
Normal Diet
Mentally Retarded
Low Phenylalanine Diet
Mentally Retarded
p /p Baby Born With Abnormal Brain
p/p Mother on Normal Diet Creates High
Phenylalanine in utereo Environment
30
Note, mental retardation is NOT inherited
rather, a response to dietary environment is
inherited.
31
Scurvy
  • Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) Is Essential For
    Collagen Synthesis
  • Most Mammals Can Synthesize Ascorbic Acid, But
    All Humans Are Homozygous For A Non-Functional
    Allele
  • Humans On A Diet Lacking Vitamin C Develop Skin
    Lesions, Fragile Blood Vessels, Poor Wound
    Healing, and Loss of Teeth -- Eventually Die.

32
Scurvy and PKU
Homozygosity for a Non-functional Allele
Dietary Environment
Enzyme Deficiency
Phenotype (Either Diseased or Normal)
33
Scurvy Is Called a Dietary DiseasePKU Is Called
a Genetic DiseaseWHY THE DIFFERENCE?
34
The Confoundment of Frequencyand Apparent
Causation inSystems of InteractingFactors
  • Factors That Are Rare Are More Strongly
    Associated With Phenotypic Variation Than Factors
    That Are Common

35
The Disease Phenotype in PKU vs. Scurvy
36
The Confoundment of Frequencyand Apparent
Causation inSystems of Interacting Factors
  • B1 B2
  • A1 Disease No Disease
  • A2 No Disease No Disease

Let Frequency of A1 0.9, Frequency of A2
0.1 Frequency of B1 0.1, and Frequency of B2
0.9
Frequency in General Population 0.09.
Frequency of the Disease Given A1 Freq. (B1)
0.1 Frequency of the Disease Given B1 Freq.
(A1) 0.9
37
Causes of Variation of a PhenotypeVersusCause
of a Phenotype
38
Two Basic, Non-Mutually Exclusive Ways of Having
Discrete Genotypes Yield Continuous Phenotypes
  • Polygenes
  • Environmental Variation

39
Polygenes
Fewer Loci
More Loci
40
Environmental Variation
41
Most Traits Are Influenced By Both Many Genes
and Environmental Variation Frequently Results
in a Normal Distribution. E.g. Cholesterol in
Framingham, MA
Relative Frequency in Population
150
220
290
Total Serum Cholesterol in mg/dl
42
The Normal Distribution Can Be Completely
Described by Just 2 Numbers The Mean (?) and
Variance (??)
43
Let x be an observed trait value
  • The mean (?) is the average or expected value of
    x.
  • The mean measures where the distribution is
    centered
  • If you have a sample of n observations, x1, x2,
    , xn, Then ? is estimated by

44
  • The variance (??) is the average or expected
    value of the squared deviation of x from the
    mean that is, (x-?)2
  • The variance measures the amount of dispersion in
    the distribution (how fat the distribution is)
  • If you have a sample of n observations, x1, x2,
    , xn, Then ?? given ? is estimated by
  • s2 (x1- ?)2 (x2-?)2 (xn- ?)2/n
  • If you do not know ???then ?? is estimated by

45
By 1916, Fisher Realized
  • Could Examine Causes of Variation, but not cause
    and effect of quantitative phenotypes.
  • Therefore, what is important about an
    individuals phenotype is not its value, but how
    much it deviates from the average of the
    population That is, focus is on variation.
  • Quantitative inheritance could not be studied in
    individuals, but only among individuals in a
    population.

46
Fishers Model
Pij ?? gi ej
47
Fishers Model
Pij ?? gi ej
The genotypic deviation for genotype i is
the Average phenotype of genotype i minus
the Average phenotype of the entire
population gi ?jPij/ni - ? Where ni is the
number of individuals with genotype i.
48
Fishers Model
Pij ?? gi ej
The environmental deviation is the deviation Of
an individuals phenotype from the Average
Phenotype of his/her Genotype ej Pij - ?jPij/ni
Pij-(gi?)Pij-?-gi
49
Fishers Model
Pij ?? gi ej
Although called the environmental deviation, ej
is really all the aspects of an
individuals Phenotype that is not explained by
genotype in This simple, additive genetic model.
50
Fishers Model
?2p Phenotypic Variance ?2p Average(Pij -
??? ?2p Average(gi ej)2
51
Fishers Model
?2p Average(gi ej)2 ?2p Average(gi2 2giej
ej2) ?2p Average(gi2)
Average(2giej) Average(ej2)
52
Fishers Model
?2p Average(gi2) Average(2giej) Average(ej2)
Because the environmental deviation is really
all the aspects of an individuals Phenotype that
is not explained by genotype, This cross-product
by definition has an average Value of 0.
53
Fishers Model
?2p Average(gi2) Average(ej2) ?2p ?2g ?2e
54
Fishers Model
?2p Average(gi2) Average(ej2) ?2p ?2g ?2e
Genetic Variance
55
Fishers Model
?2p Average(gi2) Average(ej2) ?2p ?2g ?2e
Environmental Variance (Really, the variance
not Explained by the Genetic model)
56
Fishers Model
???????????????????2p ?2g
?2e Phenotypic Variance Genetic Variance
Unexplained Variance
In this manner, Fisher partitioned the causes Of
phenotypic variation into a portion explained By
genetic factors and an unexplained portion.
57
Fishers Model
???????????????????2p ?2g
?2e Phenotypic Variance Genetic Variance
Unexplained Variance
This partitioning of causes of variation can only
be Performed at the level of a population. An
individuals phenotype is an inseparable Interacti
on of genotype and environment.
58
ApoE and Cholesterol in a Canadian Population
3/3
  • 174.6
  • ?2p 732.5

Relative Frequency
3/4
4/4
2/2
2/3
2/4
Total Serum Cholesterol (mg/dl)
59
Random Mating
60
Step 1 Calculate the Mean Phenotype of the
Population
  • (0.592)(173.8)(0.121)(161.4)(0.234)(183.5)(0.
    006)(136.0)(0.024)(178.1)(0.023)(180.3)

? 174.6
61
Step 2 Calculate the genotypic deviations
? 174.6
62
Step 3 Calculate the Genetic Variance
?2g (0.592)(-0.8)2 (0.121)(-13.2)2
(0.234)(8.9)2 (0.006)(-38.6)2 (0.024)(3.5)2
(0.023)(5.7)2
?2g 50.1
63
Step 4 Partition the Phenotypic Variance
into Genetic and Environmental Variance
?2p 732.5
?2g 50.1
?2e 682.4
64
Broad-Sense Heritability
  • h2B is the proportion of the phenotypic variation
    that can be explained by the modeled genetic
    variation among individuals.

65
Broad-Sense Heritability
  • For example, in the Canadian Population for
    Cholesterol Level
  • h2B 50.1/732.5 0.07

That is, 7 of the variation in cholesterol
levels in this population is explained by genetic
variation at the ApoE locus.
66
Broad-Sense Heritability
Genetic Variation at the ApoE locus is therefore
a cause of variation in cholesterol levels in
this population.
  • ApoE does not cause an individuals cholesterol
    level.
  • An individuals phenotype cannot be partitioned
    into genetic and unexplained factors.

67
Broad-Sense Heritability
Measures the importance of genetic Variation as a
Contributor to Phenotypic Variation Within a
Generation
The more important (and difficult) question Is
how Phenotypic Variation is Passed on to The Next
Generation.
68
(No Transcript)
69
Fishers Model
  • Assume that the distribution of environmental
    deviations (ejs) is the same every generation
  • Assign a phenotype to a gamete

70
Phenotypes of Gametes
  • Average Excess of a Gamete Type
  • Average Effect of a Gamete Type
  • These two measures are identical in a random
    mating population, so we will consider only the
    average excess for now.

71
The Average Excess
The Average Excess of Allele i Is The Average
Genotypic Deviation Caused By A Gamete Bearing
Allele i After Fertilization With A Second Gamete
Drawn From the Gene Pool According To The Demes
System of Mating.
72
The Average Excess
Where gij is the genotypic deviation of genotype
ij, tij is the frequency of ij in the population
(not necessarily HW), pi is the frequency of
allele i, and
73
The Average Excess
Note, under random mating tii pi2 and tij
2pipj, so
74
Average Excess of An Allele
Gene Pool
Random Mating
Deme
75
Average Excess of An Allele
What Genotypes Will an ?2 allele find itself in
after random mating?
Gene Pool
76
Average Excess of An Allele
What are the probabilities of these Genotypes
after random mating given an ?2 allele?
Gene Pool
Random Mating
Deme
77
Average Excess of An Allele
Gene Pool
Random Mating
Deme
78
Average Excess of An Allele
Gene Pool
Random Mating
Deme
Environment
h2B
Development
Genotypic Deviations
Average Genotypic Deviation of a ?2 bearing
gamete (0.770)(-13.2)(0.078)(-38.6)(0.152)(3.5
) -12.6
79
Average Excess of Allele ?3
Gene Pool
Random Mating
Deme
Environment
h2B
Development
Genotypic Deviations
Average Excess of ?3 (0.770)(-0.8)(0.078)(-13.2
)(0.152)(8.9) -0.3
80
Average Excess of Allele ?4
Gene Pool
Random Mating
Deme
Environment
h2B
Development
Genotypic Deviations
Average Excess of ?4 (0.770)(8.9)(0.078)(3.5)(
0.152)(5.7) 8.0
81
Gene Pool
Alleles
Frequencies
Phenotype (Average Excess)
The critical breakthrough in Fishers paper was
assigning a phenotype to a gamete, the physical
basis of the transmission of phenotypes from one
generation to the next.
82
Average Excess of ?4 (0.770)(8.9)(0.078)(3.5)(
0.152)(5.7) 8.0
The Average Excess Depends Upon the Genotypic
Deviations, which in turn Depend Upon the Average
Phenotypes of the Genotypes and And the Average
Phenotype of the Deme, which in turn Depends Upon
The Genotype Frequencies.
83
Average Excess of ?4 (0.770)(8.9)(0.078)(3.5)(
0.152)(5.7) 8.0
The Average Excess Depends Upon the Gamete
Frequencies in the Gene Pool and Upon the System
of Mating.
84
The Average Excess
The Portion of Phenotypic Variation That Is
Transmissible Through a Gamete Via Conditional
Expectations
85
The Average Effect
The Portion of Phenotypic Variation That Is
Transmissible Through a Gamete Measured At the
Level of a Deme and Its Associated Gene Pool via
Least-Squares Regression.
86
The Average Effect
Templeton (1987) showed
87
Fishers Model
  • The Next Step Is To Assign a Phenotypic Value
    To a Diploid Individual That Measures Those
    Aspects of Phenotypic Variation That Can be
    Transmitted Through the Individuals Gametes.
  • Breeding Value or Additive Genotypic Deviation Is
    The Sum of the Average Effects (Average Excesses
    Under Random Mating) of Both Gametes Borne By An
    Individual.

88
Additive Genotypic Deviation
Let k and l be two alleles (possibly the same) at
a locus of interest. Let ?k be the Average
Effect of allele k, and ?l the Average Effect of
allele l. Let gakl be the additive genotypic
deviation of genotype k/l. Then gakl ?k ?l
89
Alleles
Frequencies
Average Excess Effect (rm)
90
The Additive Genetic Variance
?2a(0.592)(-0.6)2(0.121)(-12.9)2(0.234)(7.7)2(
0.006)(-25.4)2(0.024)(-4.6)2(0.023)(16.0)2
?2a 44.7
91
The Additive Genetic Variance
Note that ?2g 50.1 gt ??2a 44.7 It is always
true that ?2g gt ??2a Have now subdivided the
genetic variance into a component that is
transmissible to the next generation and a
component that is not ?2g ??2a ??2d
92
The Additive Genetic Variance
?2g ??2a ??2d The non-additive variance,
??2d, is called the Dominance Variance in
1-locus models. Mendelian dominance is necessary
but not sufficient for ??2d gt 0. ??2d depends
upon dominance, genotype frequencies, allele
frequencies and system of mating.
93
The Additive Genetic Variance
For the Canadian Population, ?2g 50.1 and ??2a
44.7 Since ?2g ??2a ??2d 50.1 44.7
??2d ??2d 50.1 - 44.7 5.4
94
Partition the Phenotypic Variance into Additive
Genetic, non-Additive Genetic and
Environmental Variance
?2p 732.5
?2g 50.1
?2e 682.4
?2a 44.7
?2e 682.4
?2d 5.4
95
The Additive Genetic Variance
?2g ??2a ??2d ??2i In multi-locus models,
the non-additive variance is divided into the
Dominance Variance and the Interaction
(Epistatic) Variance, ??2i. Mendelian epistasis
is necessary but not sufficient for ??2i gt
0. ??2i depends upon epistasis, genotype
frequencies, allele frequencies and system of
mating.
96
The Partitioning of Variance
?2p ??2a ??2d ??2i ?2e As more loci are
added to the model, ??2e goes down relative to
??2g such that hB2 0.65 for the phenotype of
total serum cholesterol in this population.
Hence, ApoE explains about 10 of the
heritability of cholesterol levels, making it the
largest single locus contributor.
97
(Narrow-Sense) Heritability
  • h2 is the proportion of the phenotypic variance
    that can be explained by the additive genetic
    variance among individuals.

98
(Narrow-Sense) Heritability
  • For example, in the Canadian Population for
    Cholesterol Level
  • h2 44.7/732.5 0.06

That is, 6 of the variation in cholesterol
levels in this population is transmissible
through gametes to the next generation from
genetic variation at the ApoE locus.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com