Adolescents and young adults deprived of liberty: Their relationship with the penitentiary and prison system. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Adolescents and young adults deprived of liberty: Their relationship with the penitentiary and prison system.

Description:

Neither capital punishment nor life imprisonment without possibility of release ... Profess their freely chosen religious beliefs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:154
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: gli1
Learn more at: http://scm.oas.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Adolescents and young adults deprived of liberty: Their relationship with the penitentiary and prison system.


1
  • Adolescents and young adults deprived of liberty
    Their relationship with the penitentiary and
    prison system.
  • Inter-American Children's Institute (IIN)
  • Organization of American States

2
  • States Parties shall ensure that
  • No child shall be subjected to torture or other
    cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
    punishment. Neither capital punishment nor life
    imprisonment without possibility of release shall
    be imposed for offences committed by persons
    below eighteen years of age
  • No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty
    unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention
    or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity
    with the law and shall be used only as a measure
    of last resort and for the shortest appropriate
    period of time. Art. 37 CRC

3
  • States Parties recognize the right of every
    child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as
    having infringed the penal law to be treated in a
    manner consistent with the promotion of the
    child's sense of dignity and worth, which
    reinforces the child's respect for the human
    rights and fundamental freedoms of others and
    which takes into account the child's age and the
    desirability of promoting the child's
    reintegration and the child's assuming a
    constructive role in society. Art. 40 CRC

4
Juvenile Justice
  • The IINs concept of Juvenile Justice is framed
    by two core aspects that determine the course of
    any discussion on the issue
  • International standards and their application.
  • The public policy on prevention and containment
    that States should pursue.

5
Juvenile Justice
  • a) As regards international standards and their
    application in different states, the IIN notes
    the following
  • International standards include the CRC and
    guidelines for states (United Nations Guidelines
    for the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency (The
    Riyadh Guidelines) United Nations Standard
    Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile
    Justice (The Beijing Rules) United Nations Rules
    for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their
    Liberty United Nations Standard Minimum Rules
    for Non-custodial Measures, known as the Tokyo
    Rules.)
  • It also draws attention to the various standards
    in the area of human rights on the principle of
    comprehensiveness and interdependence that govern
    such matters.

6
Juvenile Justice
  • International standards should also be
    interpreted in the framework of two international
    processes that reinforce and supplement rules and
    regulations in this area
  • The Comments to States Parties and General
    Comments of the Committee on the Rights of the
    Child and other United Nations supervisory
    bodies
  • In the inter-American context, the Advisory
    Opinions, special reports and judgments of the
    Inter-American Commission and the Inter-American
    Court of Human Rights.

7
Juvenile Justice
  • In this first main section on standards the IIN
    always finds it very useful to study the
    legislative amendment process undertaken by all
    states in the Americas. In this area,
    particularly significant are the notable efforts
    and strides that only in the 1990s evinced
    trends toward the legislative review of laws
    enacted following the adoption of the Convention.

8
Juvenile Justice
  • b) Public policy of states.
  • The IIN considers that this section contains the
    challenges that most urgently require attention.
    State policy entails
  • Institution of policy and specialized legislation
    on Juvenile Criminal Justice
  • Definition of institutional roles and
    responsibilities
  • Funding
  • Independent oversight and monitoring systems
  • Data collection, analysis, and formulation of
    indicators
  • Training and cooperation with civil society

9
Juvenile Justice
  • 1.- Institution of policy and specialized
    legislation on Juvenile Criminal Justice
  • That the State adopt policy on juvenile criminal
    justice that reflects the philosophy and purposes
    of the specialized system, which should advance
    international standards and include the
    following, as a minimum
  • Policy on juvenile crime prevention.
  • Definition of the juvenile criminal liability
    system at its different stages (preventive,
    judicial, administrative or for protection) as
    well as the possibility of including restorative
    justice.
  • Policy on rehabilitation or social reintegration
    (life plan).

10
Juvenile Justice
  • 2.- Definition of institutional roles and
    responsibilities
  • A core aspect in light of the experience of the
    last decade is to define with the utmost
    precision roles and responsibilities in the
    following contexts at least
  • Judicial and other justice operators
  • Administrative or the formal protection system.
  • Community and civil society.
  • Family

11
Juvenile Justice
  • 3.- Funding
  • A reiterated recommendation of the Committee on
    the Rights of the Child is that states allocate
    resources, an objective indicator of their
    commitment to the policy and the standards.
  • The IIN is working systematically with states to
    introduce participatory mechanisms to objectively
    determine needs and find ways to include them in
    parliamentary discussions, with priority
    preferably given to investment in prevention and
    resocialization programs for adolescents and
    young adults.

12
Juvenile Justice
  • 4.- Independent oversight and monitoring systems
  • It is important for states to have in place
    independent oversight and monitoring systems to
    ensure compliance with requirements and respect
    for the basic rights of adolescents and young
    adults who have been deprived of liberty or are
    serving non-custodial sentences.
  • 5.- Data collection, analysis and formulation of
    indicators
  • States should ensure that they collect, keep a
    record of, and analyze data with which to keep
    abreast of trends and developments in the
    juvenile justice sector.

13
Juvenile Justice
  • 6.- Training and cooperation with civil society.
  • Specialized training and capacity building for
    human resources involved in any area of the
    justice system that specializes in adolescents
    and young adults in conflict with the law.

14
Juvenile Justice
  • General considerations of the IIN in this regard
  • a).- While it should be admitted that
    statistically all states report a rise of
    juvenile involvement in lawbreaking, nonetheless,
    even in countries with the highest incidence in
    this regard, the proportion of that population
    overall participating in such acts does not
    exceed eight percent. According, the approaches
    adopted to deal with this population segment
    should center on prevention and formal
    assistance designed to include this group in
    universal social protection policies.

15
Juvenile Justice
  • General considerations of the IIN in this regard
  • b).- The standards in place in all the member
    states are framed by the principles set forth in
    the Convention on the Rights of the Child. There
    is also a need to conduct a thorough review of
    procedural aspects and fair trial guarantees,
    which are exceedingly sensitive issues The right
    of defense, a process inspired by the same
    guarantees that adults enjoy in this area an at
    least two-tier system of review measures or
    penalties designed to provide restitution for the
    harm caused, and non-custodial measures as the
    preferred option. Discussions on minimum age in
    the framework of General Comment 10 of the
    Committee on the Rights of the Child. MACR 12.

16
Juvenile Justice
  • MACR 12.
  • From these recommendations, it can be concluded
    that a minimum age of criminal responsibility
    below the age of 12 years is considered by the
    Committee not to be internationally acceptable.
    States parties are encouraged to increase their
    lower MACR to the age of 12 years as the absolute
    minimum age and to continue to increase it to a
    higher age level At the same time, the Committee
    urges States parties not to lower their MACR to
    the age of 12.

17
Juvenile Justice
  • The Committee, therefore, recommends that those
    States parties which limit the applicability of
    their juvenile justice rules to children under
    the age of 16 (or lower) years, or which allow by
    way of exception that 16 or 17-year-old children
    are treated as adult criminals, change their laws
    with a view to achieving a non-discriminatory
    full application of their juvenile justice rules
    to all persons under the age of 18 years.

18
Juvenile Justice
  • General considerations of the IIN in this regard
  • c).- State social policies should expressly
    include a position on the object and purposes of
    the specialized juvenile justice system. Such
    state policies should cover the review of
    institutional roles, harmonize interventions, and
    seek restitution for the harm caused,
    dejudicialized intervention measures, and a
    commitment to specific funding.

19
Juvenile Justice
  • Worrying trends
  • Stigmatization
  • Link between citizen security and juvenile
    justice
  • Reduction of the age of criminal responsibility
  • Stiffer penalties.
  • Preference for custodial measures
  • Police brutality and institutionalized violence

20
Juvenile Justice
  • MINIMUM STANDARDS IN JUVENILE JUSTICE POLICY
  • The state can precisely determine the existence
    of
  • A national plan for prevention and treatment of
    juveniles in conflict with criminal law
  • Specialized legislation
  • A national budget appropriation for the juvenile
    criminal justice sector
  • An organized National System for Children
  • Specialized courts

21
Juvenile Justice
  • MINIMUM STANDARDS ON INITIAL CONTACT WITH
    JUVENILE JUSTICE
  • Existence of laws containing rules on arrest and
    referral
  • Existence of specialized police
  • Existence of detailed measures in the law to
    avoid judicial proceedings
  • The right of defense is guaranteed
  • Guidelines in place that determine the type of
    intervention to be applied.

22
Juvenile Justice
  • MINIMUM STANDARDS ON PROSECUTION
  • Identification of the competent authority
    (judicial or administrative organ)
  • Fair-trial guarantees are in place
  • Social/family investigation reports
  • Reasoned decision
  • Plurality of non-custodial measures
  • Sentencing judges
  • Appeal process

23
Juvenile Justice
  • MINIMUM STANDARDS ON ENFORCEMENT OF MEASURES
  • Existence of a registry system
  • Rules of procedure and disciplinary measures
  • Fit conditions and guarantees for the serving of
    sentences
  • Periodic review of the measure
  • Independent inspections
  • Training
  • Community and family participation
  • Socio-familial reintegration. Post-offense life
    plan
  • Reparation of the harm and restorative justice

24
Juvenile Justice
  • Adolescents and young adults deprived of their
    liberty.
  • It is understood from all of the foregoing that
    the Convention on the Rights of the Child imposes
    the following obligations on states parties
  • A specialized justice system for adolescents
    between the ages of 12 and 17.
  • Implementation of public policies designed to
    prevent wrongdoing.
  • A system of justice that gives precedence to
    community and familial measures designed to
    repair harm and resocialize or reeducate
    offenders.

25
Juvenile Justice
  • Deprivation of liberty is suggested as a last
    resort and must be applied within the framework
    of United Nations standards on fair trial
    guarantees.
  • Enforce the measure in purpose-built centers and
    never in regular prisons.
  • Inform adolescents about the regime to which they
    are subject and the disciplinary measures that
    would apply to them, as appropriate.
  • Receive effective, regular and private legal
    counsel.
  • Continue their education or professional
    training. In no circumstances shall the
    respective certificates include a reference to
    their confinement or the center where it was
    enforced.

26
Juvenile Justice
  • Continue to engage in recreational or leisure
    pursuits.
  • Receive information on their rights as juveniles
    and on complaints procedures
  • Be housed separate from other children who might
    have a negative influence on their conduct and
    from those who are 18 or over and still serving a
    sentence.
  • Be housed in healthy conditions in an adequate
    physical environment.

27
Juvenile Justice
  • Wear ordinary clothes that, therefore, do not
    distinguish their condition, either through
    uniformity or because they have emblems,
    monograms or other features that single them out.
  • Have access to permitted work.
  • Profess their freely chosen religious beliefs
  • Receive such medical care and specialized
    treatment as they require.
  • Receive visits from relatives and communicate
    regularly with them.

28
Juvenile Justice
  • Remain in contact with the local community in
    order to elevate their sociability levels.
  • Be appropriately treated by the officials in
    charge of their custody.
  • Appropriate treatment means that children shall
    not be subject to collective penalties or be made
    to act as agents to maintain order or
    discipline.
  • Be gradually and progressively reintegrated in
    normal society and be informed of the stages
    provided for that reintegration.
  • Have recourse to appeal mechanisms to ensure the
    above rights.

29
Juvenile Justice
  • FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
  • The best juvenile justice system is that which
    does not require institutionalizing interventions
    but is strengthened by universal and inclusive
    public policies.
  • The principles of best interests and
    comprehensive protection are served to the extent
    that the system of laws, their observance, and
    the proactive role of the entities involved
    recognize and uphold those principles.

30
Juvenile Justice
  • FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
  • When the state intervenes and, depending on the
    seriousness of the offense, a custodial measure
    is put into effect, it must be governed by
    universal principles in this area, in particular
    those that safeguard the fundamental rights of
    the adolescents and young adults subject to that
    system. The system should also be predominantly
    educational and be oriented toward the
    reintegration of adolescent or young adult
    offenders in society, their family, and the
    community.

31
IIN
  • www.iin.oea.org
  • jvalladares_at_oas.org

CE00381E
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com