Clean Air Act - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Clean Air Act

Description:

The Federal Clean Air Act, passed in 1970 and last amended in 1990, forms the ... the Environmental Protection Agency promulgated a rule 'bumping' the San Joaquin ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: kcg1
Category:
Tags: act | air | bumping | clean | lapsed

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Clean Air Act


1
Clean Air Act
  • The Federal Clean Air Act, passed in 1970 and
    last amended in 1990, forms the basis for the
    national air pollution control effort.

2
Clean Air Act elements
  • The Acts basic elements include
  • National ambient air quality standards for major
    air pollutants
  • State attainment plans
  • Vehicle emissions standards
  • Stationary source emissions standards and
    permits
  • Acid rain control measures
  • Stratospheric ozone protection and enforcement
    provisions

3
Air Basins
  • Air basins are geographic areas sharing a common
    air shed.
  • Kern County is located within two of these areas
    The San Joaquin Valley Basin and The Mojave
    Desert Basin.
  • Air pollution is directly related to the regions
    topographic features that restrict air movement.

4
Non-attainment and reclassification
  • In November 2000, the Environmental Protection
    Agency promulgated a rule bumping the San
    Joaquin Valley Air District from serious
    non-attainment for ozone levels to severe
    non-attainment.

5
Consequences
  • Today, the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air
    Pollution Control District has less than 18
    months to develop a State Implementation Plan
    (SIP) to bring the basin into compliance by 2005.
  • Failure to complete the SIP within that period
    may result in sanctions.

6
Ozone standard
  • The Valley has until the end of 2005 to achieve
    the federal one-hour ozone (VOC NOx) standard.
  • To achieve this, the district may not exceed the
    standard more than once each year at any
    monitoring station beginning in 2003.

7
Sanctions
  • If an area is found to have not submitted or
    implemented adequate plans to attain air quality
    standards, the Clean Air Act authorizes the EPA
    to administer two forms of sanctions
  • 21 offsets on new or modified emission
    sources
  • Federal highway fund withholdings.

8
21 sanctions
  • The 21 sanction requires any company that is
    constructing a new facility or modifying an
    existing one over a certain size to reduce
    emissions in the area by two tons of ozone for
    every new ton generated.

9
Sanctions continued
  • Under the Act, there are two provisions through
    which the EPA may order federal highway funds
    withheld sanctions and a lack of conformity.
  • The EPA has the power to withhold certain federal
    highway funds if 21 offsets are deemed
    ineffective.

10
Highway fund withholding
  • Instances of this sanction are rare. Since 1990,
    only two areas have had highway sanctions
    imposed, the last of which was E. Helena,
    Montana, in 1999.

11
Conformity
  • Conformity requirements have been invoked more
    frequently. Areas in 29 states have experienced a
    lapse of conformity at some time since 1993. Five
    areas, including Atlanta, Georgia, are currently
    lapsed.

12
Conformity, continued
  • Conformity requirements prohibit federal
    departments and agencies from approving or
    providing financial support to transportation
    improvements in lapsed areas, unless the
    improvements conform with the State
    Implementation Plan for achieving air quality.

13
Where we are now
  • The California Air Resources Board and the
    SJVUAPCD have proposed establishing a valley-wide
    emissions budget for the next ozone plan update
  • Valley COGs have formed a task force to review
    the issue in light of the severe potential for
    noncompliance.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com