Conflicts of Interest - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Conflicts of Interest

Description:

... Conflict of ... AAMC Individual Conflicts of Interest in Human Subjects ... and Institutional Financial Conflict of Interest' October 2001 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: medi233
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Conflicts of Interest


1
Conflicts of Interest
  • Brenda Seiton, J.D.
  • Assistant Dean for Administration
  • Department Administrators Course
  • September 1, 2006

2
Presentation Overview
  • Individual Conflicts of Interest
  • Consulting Agreements
  • Start-up Companies
  • Use of Emory Resources
  • Institutional Conflicts of Interest

3
Individual Conflict of Interest
  • Definition A situation that occurs when an
    individual has an outside interest (usually
    financial) that affects or appears to affect the
    individuals professional judgment in carrying
    out university responsibilities
  • Interest may influence the universitys business
    and research decisions
  • Interest may influence the integrity of the
    employees decisions in teaching, research, and
    service
  • Interest may appear to influence individuals
    decisions

4
Conflicts? Which Conflicts?
  • Physician/Researcher
  • Experiment/Therapy
  • Federal Funds/Private Funds
  • Consultant, Inventor, Equity Holder,
    Researcher/Teacher
  • Time Commitments
  • Resource Allocation
  • Hiring relatives
  • Accepting gifts

5
Why do we care?
  • Public Trust
  • Maintain integrity credibility for our
    investigators institution
  • Role models to our students trainees
  • Protecting human subjects

6
A word about money . . .
  • In 2004, the median household income in the State
    of Georgia was 49,475
  • Average pharmaceutical companys marketing budget
    was 120,700,000
  • Of these budgets approximately 30,000,000 was
    spent on Thought Leaders
  • These Thought Leaders include our faculty

7
Regulations University Policies
  • University Bylaws Article IX
  • Research Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Policy on Use of Letterhead and Facilities for
    Private Purpose
  • Policy on Private Consulting by Faculty
  • Employment of Relatives (Nepotism)
  • Institutional Conflict of Interest Procedures
  • Guidelines for the Responsible Conduct of
    Scholarship and Research
  • http//www.or.emory.edu/share/policies/conflict_in
    terest.cfm
  • Public Health Service
  • National Science Foundation
  • Food Drug Administration
  • NIH Policies
  • Internal Revenue Service
  • Securities Exchange Commission

8
Guidance Documents
  • AAMC Individual Conflicts of Interest in Human
    Subjects Research - December 2001
  • AAMC Institutional Conflicts of Interest in
    Human Subjects Research October 2002
  • AAU Report on Individual and Institutional
    Financial Conflict of Interest October 2001
  • AMA Code of Medical Ethics, Opinion 8.031,
    March 1992
  • Professional Societies and Peer Reviewed Journals

9
Consulting Agreement Basics
  • Faculty members may engage in outside consulting
    activities when the activities and the agreements
    have been approved by their Chairs and the Deans
    Office
  • Applicable policies from the University and
    School of Medicine may be found on the web
  • University Faculty Handbook Chapter 3
    Policies, Reimbursement Compensation
    http//www.emory.edu/PROVOST/
  • School of Medicine Faculty Affairs Page
    http//www.emory.edu/WHSC/MED/DEAN/facultyaffairs.
    html

10
Consulting Agreement Basics
  • What activities are considered consulting?
  • Providing advice to an external company, person,
    or organization
  • Serving on an advisory committee
  • Serving on a review committee
  • Developing products owned by external group as
    long as Emory resources are NOT used and not
    within scope of academic duties
  • Speaking to the community or press about a
    companys products, provided that the information
    has already been published

11
Consulting Agreement Requirements
  • Agreement must be between faculty member as a
    private individual, i.e. not representing Emory
  • Correspondence and payments made directly to the
    faculty member
  • Required language (see Consulting Agreement
    Reference Sheet)
  • Must be approved by Chair and Deans Office who
    take into consideration
  • the academic and clinical needs of the
    Department, the School, Emory Healthcare, and the
    practice plans and
  • the benefit of the consulting activity to the
    faculty member and the University

12
Which activities are not permitted in a
Consulting Agreement?
  • Faculty may not use any Emory or EmoryHealthcare
    facilities, resources, or personnel for their
    private consulting activities
  • This means
  • no Emory laboratories or data
  • no reagents or equipment ordered by Emory
  • no Emory lab techs or assistants
  • no Emory conference rooms
  • no EmoryHealthcare operating rooms
  • no Emory trademarks, tradenames, or logos
  • no Emory intellectual property

13
Which activities are not permitted in a
Consulting Agreement?
  • Faculty may not engage in the practice of
    medicine
  • Providing information or advice about an
    individual patient
  • Providing treatment to an individual patient
  • Prescribing treatments for individual patients
  • Recommending particular physicians in the
    patients geographical area
  • Faculty may not perform research or teach classes
    without written approval from Dean

14
Potential Conflicts of Interest Created Due to
Consulting Relationships
  • Consulting activities research or academic
    activities overlap
  • Inappropriate use of Emory facilities or
    resources
  • Most editors require disclosure of any consulting
    relationships
  • Consulting fees greater than 10k may trigger COI
    Research policy and review is required by the COI
    Committee

15
Start-up Companies
  • Faculty owned companies
  • Purpose is to develop and/or commercialize
    intellectual property that faculty developed at
    Emory or other institution
  • Outcomes include commercial sales by start-up or
    sale to larger corporation

16
SOM Procedures for Start-up Companies
  • Faculty are required to submit to Chair and Dean
    a report outlining the business plan
  • Appropriate time for faculty member to start a
    company?
  • Time commitments?
  • Competitive with Emory?
  • Report must be reviewed by SOM Conflict of
    Interest Committee
  • Review by Office of Technology Transfer is
    required if plans include use of Emory
    Intellectual Property
  • If Emory technology is licensed to the start-up
    company, Emory may request an equity share in the
    company if cash is not available
  • http//www.emory.edu/WHSC/MED/DEAN/facultyaffairs.
    html

17
Potential Conflicts with Start-up Companies
  • Use of Emory technology by business prior to
    license
  • Negotiating with Emory on behalf of company
  • Use of Emory resources
  • Co-mingling of assets with Emory
  • Inappropriate transfer of data/information/technol
    ogy to company
  • Fiduciary duty to company

18
Conflict Management University Federal
Requirements
  • Conflicts must be
  • Disclosed in writing (annually and as
    circumstances change)
  • Reviewed by designated officials
  • Properly managed, reduced, or eliminated
  • Consistent monitoring and oversight
  • Sanctions employed for non-compliance

19
Process for Disclosure Review
  • Disclosures obtained annually from faculty
  • Annual Disclosure Form available on-line
    http//med.emory.edu/administration/faculty_affair
    s/profile_coi_links.cfm
  • Disclosure statements included on Sponsored
    Projects Approval Form, IRB forms, IACUC
    applications, Appointment Promotions Committee
  • Disclosures reviewed to determine whether a
    conflict of interest or commitment exists
  • If a potential conflict is found, more
    information from individual is requested

20
Types of Information Requested for Review by COI
Committee
  • Faculty Status
  • Research Proposal/Business Plan
  • Equity Interest/Financial Interest
  • Corporate Information
  • Consulting/Advisory Agreements
  • License Agreements
  • Report from Individual(s)

21
What are the Goals?
  • To protect the integrity of data against bias,
    and thereby the reputation of the institution and
    the individual faculty member
  • To protect the safety of human subjects in
    research
  • To carry out the missions of the institution in
    accordance with the highest ethical standards

22
Considerations for Management Tools
  • Is the research clinical or non-clinical?
  • Is this a pilot study?
  • Does the investigator have unique expertise?
  • What protections are built into the study design?
  • Is the study design reviewed by peers through a
    grant review panel?
  • How will data be used, i.e. is this the pivotal
    study for approval by the FDA?
  • From where does the investigator receive the
    majority of his/her funding?
  • What would be the publics perception of the
    conflict?
  • Would this activity expose the University or the
    investigator to scrutiny by the IRS, SEC, or
    other federal agency?

23
Individual Conflicts That Are Not Permitted
  • Purchasing equipment/materials used in research
    from a private firm in which the investigator has
    a significant financial interest or other direct
    relationship (consultant)
  • Using SOM facilities/resources by an entity when
    the investigator is a consultant or has equity
    ownership
  • Using students/trainees on research projects
    directed by a conflicted investigator in a way
    that restricts
  • Freedom to discuss findings
  • Seeking training and advice from others
  • Conducting job searches freely
  • Publishing freely (confidentiality agreements)

24
Managing Conflicts General Principles
  • Emory owns all the intellectual property
    generated by its employees and students (with
    some exceptions)
  • External activities cannot compromise the
    employees ability to perform his/her full-time
    Emory job
  • Emory business (scholarship, teaching service) is
    conducted in a manner that is above inferences
    that the activity could be compromised by the
    employees expectation of financial gain, direct
    or indirect
  • Students, trainees, and employees must be
    assigned duties consistent with their status and
    position. Their work should not be compromised
    by agreements with external sponsors or by a
    faculty members financial interests.
  • The University must authorize any use of Emorys
    research facilities, personnel, and intellectual
    property for use by anyone other than Emory

25
Management Plans
  • Disclosure
  • Re-design of research project
  • Appointment of independent reviewer(s)
  • Limitation of corporate responsibilities
  • Leave of absence from faculty duties
  • Prohibition of certain responsibilities
    associated with research or Emory activities
  • Divestment of corporate interest
  • Prohibition of corporate relationship
  • Annual reports on compliance with management plans

26
Questionable Uses of Emory Resources
  • Press releases or marketing campaigns by outside
    companies
  • Provision of facilities or resources to outside
    companies
  • Filming at Emory
  • Training Programs
  • Endorsements
  • Testimonials

27
Things to remember
  • All interactions with the press or public
    relations firm must be cleared with the Office of
    Communications
  • Emory facilities and resources cannot be used for
    commercial, political, or private financial gain
    or commercial advertising by third parties
  • Endorsements are not permitted and testimonials
    are rarely permitted (must be cleared through
    General Counsel and Communications)

28
Institutional Conflicts of Interest
  • When the financial or personal interests of the
    institution, or of an institutional official
    acting in his/her official capacity, might affect
    or appear to affect
  • Any phase of its research mission -- conduct,
    review, oversight and compliance, outcome
  • Finances and economic status of the
    institution/school/department
  • Missions of the institution/school/department
  • Appropriate vendor relationships
  • Employment practices (oversight of faculty,
    staff, students)

29
To Maintain the Public Trust . . .
  • Institutional officials must
  • Make decisions and policies for the institution
    that are free from improper bias or conflict of
    interest
  • Be able to document that they have done so

30
The Institution has Competing Interests in . . .
  • Its reputation
  • Its research integrity
  • The safety and welfare of its human subjects
  • Its financial gain from external entities
    donors, research sponsors, companies, investments
  • Its own academic and clinical missions and the
    policies that support them
  • Allocations of space, money, people
  • Review and approval processes
  • Monitoring, auditing, compliance
  • Discipline
  • Purchasing for Departments, School, Hospitals,
    Clinic, Grady

Decisions are made by Chairs Deans at SOM level
31
Potential ICOI in Research
  • Exist when the institution or institutional
    officials who manage or oversee research also
  • Might get royalties from the sale of the product
    that is to be investigated
  • Hold any equity through licensing its technology
    to a non-publicly traded research sponsor (e.g.,
    startup company)
  • Hold ownership interests through licensing its
    technology to a publicly-traded research sponsor
    (gt100K ?)
  • Receives a significant gift from a potential
    research sponsor

32
Potential ICOI in Research
  • When an institutional official who has research
    responsibility has a
  • Significant financial interest in the research
    sponsor or the product to be investigated
  • Equity interest
  • Consulting relationship
  • Honoraria, gifts
  • Service as officer, board member
  • Purchasing relationship with the research sponsor
    (vendor)

33
Rules and Regulationson ICOI
  • Various regulations and statutes govern ICOI in
    finance, employment, Board duties, etc. (IRS,
    SEC, corporate law . . . )
  • No federal regulations on ICOI in research
  • Excellent guidance for institutions engaged in
    human subject research, adaptable to broader
    application
  • Protecting Subjects, Preserving Trust, Promoting
    Progress II Principles Recommendations for
    Oversight of an Institutions Financial Interests
    in Human Subjects Research
  • AAMC Task Force on Financial Conflicts of
    Interest in Clinical Research, October 2002

34
A Few SIMPLE Rules For Chairs Administrators
  • Carefully weigh the competing interests
  • Need for money, but does the end justify the
    means?
  • Think about how the arrangement would be seen in
    view of an adverse event involving a patient
  • Think about your own and the institutions
    reputation (with colleagues and the public) if
    the arrangement is published in the newspaper
  • Ask yourself whether the arrangement passes the
    smell test
  • Think about ways to manage the potential COI
    disclose or modify the arrangement for better
    management of the COI

35
A Few SIMPLE Rules for The Institution
  • Separate the roles of administrators who oversee
    and make institutional decisions about research
    and administration from those who oversee
    investments and technology transfer
  • Have established policies and procedures for the
    identification, disclosure, review, and
    management or elimination of potential ICOI
  • Have an ICOI Committee with some external
    members, and high-ranking independent internal
    members (not COI Committee)
  • Make use of external committees, ad hoc or
    standing, routinely or in certain cases, if
    feasible

36
A Few SIMPLE Rules . . .
  • Have good communication among the ICOI Committee,
    COI Committee(s), Tech Transfer Office, and IRB
  • Disclose, disclose, disclose
  • Require IRB members to disclose potential
    conflicts of interest and recuse or divest if
    appropriate

37
School of Medicine Conflict of Interest Committee
Members Tristram Parslow, M.D., Ph.D., Chair
Pathology
Laboratory Medicine Edmund E. Waller, M.D., Ph.D.
, Vice-Chair Hematology/Oncology, WCI Greg
Berns, M.D., Ph.D.
Psychiatry Behavioral Sciences Victoria Greene,
J.D., M.D. Gynecology/Obstetrics Jay Justice,
Ph.D. Chemistry, Emory College Jeff Lessesne,
M.D. Geriatric Medicine Rebecca Pentz, Ph.D.
Winship Cancer
Institute James Ramsay, M.D. Anesthesiology

Ex-Officio Members Claudia R. Adkison, J.D,
Ph.D., Exec. Assoc. Dean/Faculty Affairs
Administration Todd Sherer, Ph.D. Director,
OTT Brenda J. Seiton, J.D. Asst.
Dean for Administration Tanya Sudia-Robinson,
Ph.D. IRB/IACUC Office Shawn Akkerman, Pharm. D.
OSP Arri Eisen,
Ph.D. Center for
Ethics Biology
38
Questions/More Information
  • Brenda J. Seiton, JD, Assistant Dean for
    Administration, bseiton_at_emory.edu 727-3413
  • Claudia R. Adkison, JD, Ph.D., Executive
    Associate Dean/Administration Faculty Affairs,
    cadkison_at_emory.edu 727-5673
  • Kris West, JD, Chief Compliance Officer, Emory
    University Research Office kwest02_at_emory.edu
    727-2237
  • Emory Healthcare Anne Adams, MHA, JD, Chief
    Compliance Officer, EHC anne_adams_at_emoryhealthcare
    .org 778-2186
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com