Title: Etics, Emics, Estonians and Russians in Contemporary Estonia: Is the Past still Dominating the Present?
1Etics, Emics, Estonians and Russians in
Contemporary Estonia Is the Past still
Dominating the Present?
- Aksel Kirch, Tarmo Tuisk, Hanna-Hulda Reinkort
Presentation at IACCP Congress 27-31 July,
2008 Bremen, Germany
2Background
- 1918 Republic of Estonia
- 1939 Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact
- 1940 Start of the Soviet occupation
- 1941-1945 World War II
- 1991 Estonia regained independence
- 2004 EU membership of Estonia
- 2007 Bronze Soldier related events in Tallinn
3Research Method
- Identity Structure Analysis (ISA)
- Developed by Prof. Peter Weinreich (University of
Ulster) - Targeted (also) for cross-cultural studies
- Consists of etic and emic parameters
- Etic cross-cultural universals
- Emic reflecting qualities of local cultures
4Main Definitions
- ISA is an open-ended conceptual framework, which
can be used to explore individual or group
identities within particular socio-cultural and
historical contexts. It is thus primarily
concerned with the individual and societal
phenomena within which issues of identity are
implicated. - Definition of identity A persons identity is
defined as the totality of ones self-construal,
in which how one construes oneself in the present
expresses the continuity between how one
construes oneself as one was in the past and how
one construes oneself as one aspires to be in the
future. (WeinreichSaunderson, 2003, 26)
5The Sample and the Instrument
- The method is applicable between relatively
homogenous groups (e.g. Estonian and Russian
students of the International University
Audentes) - 54 Estonians and 46 Russians were questioned in
February 2008 at the IUA - Each respondent filled a questionnaire that
consisted of 11 rating sheets placing
him/herself into 10 different positions (e.g.
significant others).
6Significant Issues
- The symbols and connotation of World War II in
the case of both ethnic groups were tested - The influence of Russias media for Estonian
Russians - The role of Estonian language in the integration
process - Estonias fast economic development was
questioned - Government as a responsible body for economic
well-being was opposed to personal efforts of
every person - Are there differences between Estonians and
Russians noticeable?
7Idealistic Identification with Others
Index value is high when above 0.70 and low when
below 0.50
8Contra-Identification with Others
Index value is high when above 0.45 and low when
below 0.25
9Empathetic Identification with Others
Index value is high when above 0.70 and low when
below 0.50
10Conflicted Identification
The index value is moderate from 0.20 to 0.35,
and high when between 0.35 and 0.50. Estonians
and Russians both have high conflicted
identification with entity Estonian Russians.
11Identity Diffusion
Identity diffusion is considered to be the
dispersion of conflicted identifications with
others, where the greater the magnitude of
identification conflicts and the more extensive
their dispersion across others, the more severe
is the diffusion (Weinreich, 200364).
When we combine self-evaluation with identity
diffusion, 9 identity variants result.
12Identity Variants
13Constructs used for Group Typologies
Estonia has the likelihood of fast economic development as its economy is flexible and innovative lt2gt Estonia hasnt any likelihood of fast development as the country is small and resources are low
The Estonian government is responsible for the difficult economic situation of the population lt6gt First at all everyone has to manage himself/herself
The Soviet Union was the liberator of Eastern Europe in WW II lt9gt The Soviet Union was the occupier of Eastern Europe in WW II
14Group Typology I
15Group Typology II
16Conclusions
- The April 2007 events have facilitated
Estonians to mobilise themselves politically to
protect the Republic of Estonia after 16 years
break - Russian media, Russias hostility towards
neighbours and history of World War II still stay
somewhere in the minds of Estonians of not
letting to forget the past. - For Russians it is clear that the integration
mechanism is going to be via Estonian language
and culture and convergence in values with
Estonians is taking place. - At the same time significant symbols as the
Bronze Soldier have still their role in
Russians memories and attitudes that cause
conflicted identifications leading to high
identity diffusion that restricts smooth
integration process.
17Conclusions
- The authors would like to emphasise that the
events of April 2007 do not reflect any kind of
ethnic conflict between Estonians and Russians,
the contradictions base largely on different
cultures having different historical background
related to World War II.