The Changing Participatory Role of NGOs in New Jersey GIS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

The Changing Participatory Role of NGOs in New Jersey GIS

Description:

CRSSA. The Changing Participatory Role of NGOs in ... Environmental NGOs: Community Access to Technology as a ... Ways of circumventing data access ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: davidltu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Changing Participatory Role of NGOs in New Jersey GIS


1
DRAFT 7-20-02
  • The Changing Participatory Role of NGOs in New
    Jersey GIS

DRAFT 7-20-02
David L. Tulloch and Tamara Shapiro Center for
Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis Cook College,
Rutgers University
DRAFT 7-20-02
2
The Times They are AChangin
  • In 1998
  • NJ NGC The New Jersey Non-Profit GIS Community
  • NJ DEP
  • Written up in
  • Tulloch, D. 2002. "Environmental NGOs Community
    Access to Technology as a Force for Change,"
    chapter in, Community Empowerment, Public
    Participation and Geographic Information Science.
    W. Craig, T. Harris, and D. Weiner (Eds.).
    Taylor and Francis London.

3
The Times They are AChangin
  • Today
  • The GIS Center
  • NGOs helping NGOS
  • Office of GIS
  • NJ DEP
  • Counties?

4
  • Background

5
The Garden State
  • New Jersey
  • Densest state in the US
  • Modest local GIS activity
  • Tradition of Strong Home Rule
  • NJ State Mapping Advisory Committee
  • Environmental NGOs

6
New Jersey Then
  • Environmental NGOs are a dominant force
  • Using public data to participate
  • Taking on roles sometimes reserved for local
    governments
  • Assisting/demanding the development of publicly
    accessible local geospatial data

7
  • Understanding the Garden State

8
Previous conditions
  • Pre-existing conditions that cannot be easily
    changed, or copied
  • Environmental condition
  • Density and development
  • Geophysical intersection
  • Political situation
  • Strong Home Rule (566 Municipalities)
  • Confounding parcel regulations
  • Local cost recovery as allowed by NJ Supreme Court

9
1972
10
1984
11
1995
12
(No Transcript)
13
Promoting PPGIS in NJ
  • Office of GIS
  • Distributing foundational data
  • Distributing software
  • requiring hardware and training
  • NJ Non-profit GIS Community
  • Providing technical support
  • Access to high-end hardware and software
  • User group (emotional support?)

14
  • Different Decisions Different Ways

15
Public Decisions
  • What are the decisions in which NGOs are
    participating?
  • 3 decisions stand out
  • Municipal Land Use Decisions
  • State-wide Environmental Policies (regulatory)
  • State Agency Land Acquisition Decisions

16
Participation (as in 1998)
members
Public Decision
NGOs
Citizens
LAND
GIS

17
Participation (new)
GIS-based facts
Public Decision
NGOs
Citizens
LAND
GIS
18
Non-Participation
NGOs
Citizens
LAND
Not trivial uses
19
Participation and Access
  • What is the difference?
  • Tulloch, D., and T. Shapiro, 2002, The
    Intersection of Data Access and Public
    Participation Impacting GIS Users' Success?
    URISA Journal (Under Review).

20
(No Transcript)
21
The Nature Conservancy (of NJ)
  • Access to public data and information
  • Using outside
  • participatory avenues

http//nature.org
22
Delaware Raritan Canal
  • Access to public data and information
  • Using outside
  • participatory avenues

http//www.delrargreenway.org/
23
Morris Land Conservancy
  • Access to public data and information
  • Using data inside and outside
  • participatory avenues

http//www.morrislandconservancy.org/
24
NJ Conservation Foundation
  • Access to public data and information
  • Using within participatory avenues
  • Guiding state open space acquisitionplan

A
Y
N
N
P
Y
http//www.njconservation.org/
25
Passaic River Coalition
  • Access to public data and information
  • Using within and outside participatory avenues

http//www.njconservation.org/
26
  • Conclusions

27
A Community At-Risk
  • While the elements in this community seem to have
    become institutionalized, there are significant
    opportunities for instability
  • The relationships that maintain the network could
    quickly dissolve
  • The data, now readily available, could become
    scarce

28
Chain Reaction?
NGC
The GIS Center
Relationships
Feedback
Long-term Stability
29
Barriers to Participation
  • Budgets
  • Technical problems
  • Insufficient access
  • Parcel data
  • By far the most common answer
  • Zoning (566)
  • Natural resources (Improved soils)
  • Updated land use/land cover

30
Getting to Participation
  • Through Sophisticated Mapping
  • Wow, Nice Map!
  • Can we get your data?
  • Through Analysis
  • You scared the Hell out of us and now you have
    to do something!

31
A Model For Others?
  • Participation Proxies
  • Networks of Data Sharing
  • Ways of circumventing data access problems
  • Stealth GIS
  • Inexpensive opportunities still exist to impress
    and gain credibility and thereby earn a seat at
    the table

32
Want More?
  • dtulloch_at_crssa.rutgers.edu
  • tshapiro_at_aesop.rutgers.edu
  • www.crssa.rutgers.edu/dtulloch/ppgis/

DRAFT 7-20-02
DRAFT 7-20-02
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com