COUNCIL of MORTGAGE LENDERS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

COUNCIL of MORTGAGE LENDERS

Description:

COUNCIL of MORTGAGE. LENDERS. Can the housing market operate effectively without intervention? ... standards, regulation and direct intervention via subsidies ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: peter1153
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: COUNCIL of MORTGAGE LENDERS


1
Can the housing market operate effectively
without intervention?A view from the dark side
  • Peter Williams
  • Council of Mortgage Lenders, London

2
My presentation
  • Challenging to me and to you!
  • Previous lives, current roles
  • Reflections
  • The Housing Market, Failure and Potential
  • Role of the State
  • Conclusions

3
Reflections
  • A statist audience? Inherent suspicion/ criticism
    of the market yet careers built on critique of
    the state?
  • State v market - a quiet area in housing studies?
    Implicit/lost in technical clutter?
  • Calls for intervention easy in theory!
  • A permanent tension - boundary shifts over time
    reflecting economy/society

4
The Housing Market
  • The market is dominant and this is true in
    housing - tenure and provision
  • For the most part it works efficiently/effectively
    and with relatively low subsidy?
  • Expanding supply, satisfied consumers, innovative
    and competitive.
  • FTBs 370,000 in 2005 but see Chart 1
  • Provide for those on low incomes?
  • Weaknesses yes but then their causes ?

5
Number and proportion of first-time buyers,
1973-2003
Source FTB numbers - Holmans (2005) FTB
proportion - Survey of Mortgage Lenders
6
Market Failure
  • Market failure? Quality, rural, energy but..
  • The 1991 recession 76,000 repos and 835,000 2
    months in arrears 10 but market continued
    (330,000FTBs)
  • Market volatility if failure whose? The economy
    stupid!
  • Generally no, though much to address - one
    question is how?

7
Market Potential
  • Markets good and government bad is an
    oversimplification but market/democracy
  • Can the housing market deliver in line with
    individual/social aspirations?
  • Recognise the diversity of housing markets and
    different settings/issues
  • Markets can allocate relatively efficiently and
    at low cost - through the price mechanism/signal

8
Market Potential
  • Generally we have witnessed a forward march in
    terms of peoples housing conditions/circumstances
    - pre-dominantly via the market. But at the
    margins..?
  • Market theory and reality diverge but
    alternatives?
  • Turn the question around - the capacity of the
    state?

9
Role of the State
  • Long history of central/local government
    intervention in housing in the UK
  • Cost and longevity are two reasons alongside
    distribution of wealth/income
  • Role changed over time - standards, regulation
    and direct intervention via subsidies/homes
  • Focus has largely been on public sector housing
    with sporadic forays into the private sector

10
Role of the State
  • Council housing - 5 million homes and the
    creation of an industry
  • Forays into the private sector controls on
    prices, land, building, planning, finance
    provision of mortgages/grants taxation and
    subsidies and most recently mortgage regulation,
    home buying and selling and HMO landlords and 75
    target

11
Role of the State
  • Intervention in reality - the CBA
  • Home buying Between the market and politics?
  • Mortgage regulation rationality and reality?
  • REITS/SIPPS Grant for developers
  • RRO Low demand/market renewal - market failure
    or the market? And state intervention?

12
Role of the State
  • Sporadic/often contradictory government failure
  • Continuing ambiguity around property ownership -
    promote it/tax it
  • Encourage the market/distrust the market
  • Devolve and centralise
  • Increasing market intervention reflecting new
    found importance of housing?
  • Housing market central to meeting policy
    objectives

13
Conclusions
  • Markets capacity to innovate/meet demand
  • Market can deliver but at what price?
  • States capacity to meet social objectives and at
    what price?
  • Intervention of different form? competition on
    supply side, choice on demand side - both in
    evidence
  • Steering the market? Evidence to date weak

14
Conclusions
  • Returning to the proposition can the housing
    market operate effectively without intervention
    to a large degree YES
  • Does intervention improve the operation of the
    market to a large degree No
  • What do we want build on the strengths of the
    market and a new realism, recognising the
    weaknesses of the state ( and of the market)

15
References
  • Barlow, J Duncan S (1992) Markets, States and
    Housing Provision Four European Growth Regions
    Compared, Progress in Planning, 38,2
  • Cole, I (2006) Hidden from History? Housing
    studies, the Perpetual Present and the Case of
    Social Housing, Housing Studies,21,2,283-295
  • DTI (2005) Public Policy Using Market Based
    Approaches, Economics Paper 14, DTI, London
  • Hills, J (1991) Unravelling Housing Finance,
    Clarendon Press, Oxford
  • Holmans, A (2006)Policies in Britain in the 1970s
    on mortgage lending, house prices and mortgage
    interest rates An episode of intervention worth
    remembering, CCHP, Cambridge
  • Norberg, J (2003) In Defense of Global
    Capitalism, Cato Institute, USA
  • Saunders, P (1995) Capitalism - A Social Audit,
    Open Univ Press
  • Self, P (2000) Rolling back the market economic
    dogma and political choice,Macmillan, London
  • Smith, S. J. (2005) States, markets and an ethic
    of care Political Geography 24 1-20
  • Smith, S. J., Munro, M. and Christie (2006)
    Performing (housing) markets. Urban Studies 43
    81-98
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com