Workshop on Clinical Outcome Measures and endpoints for efficacy assessment in spinal muscular atrop - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Workshop on Clinical Outcome Measures and endpoints for efficacy assessment in spinal muscular atrop

Description:

Fibromyalgia, Poliomyelitis, Myotonic Dystrophy, Spinal Bulbar Muscular Atrophy, ... population though has been used in Limb-Girdle Dystrophy natural history studies ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: lisakir
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Workshop on Clinical Outcome Measures and endpoints for efficacy assessment in spinal muscular atrop


1
Workshop on Clinical Outcome Measures and
endpoints for efficacy assessment in spinal
muscular atrophy13th October European Medicines
Agency, London
  • Scientific Consensus on Outcome Measures for
    Ambulatory SMA

2
Ambulatory Individuals with SMA (Able to
walk 10 M with no assistive device)
  • Experts convened to discuss outcome measures
    endpoints used in SMA.
  • Initiated an evidence based literature review
    of outcome measures used in SMA.
  • Results of above shared with working groups and
    recommendations offered.
  • What is missing from the Evidence Based Medicine
    paradigm in this ambulatory or SMA III
    presentation is the consensus of patient opinion

3
Suggestion for Primary Outcome Measure
  • The Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
  • The 6MWT has been used to assess function and
    endurance in a number of diseases and has
    recently been chosen as a primary outcome in
    therapeutic trials in several neuromuscular
    disorders.
  • There is no literature on the use of the 6MWT in
    ambulatory individuals with SMA.
  • Why recommend? Precedent in other disorders,
    including neuromuscular, and its acceptance by
    Regulatory as a primary outcome measure.

4
Secondary Outcome Measures
  • A comprehensive assessment including measures of
    function, strength, pulmonary function and
    electrophysiological studies.

5
Secondary Outcome Recommendations
  • Timed Functional Tests (10 M walk, up from floor,
    out of chair, climbing stairs)
  • Functional Scale ( MFM, North Star, Expanded
    Hammersmith, MHFMS-EXTEND)
  • Record of Falls
  • Strength Hand-held myometry (age gt 5 years)
  • Pulmonary Function Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
    (age gt5 years)
  • CMAP

6
Evidence for 6MWT
  • Cardiopulmonary literature
  • Fibromyalgia, Poliomyelitis, Myotonic Dystrophy,
    Spinal Bulbar Muscular Atrophy, MPS 1,Late Onset
    Pompe disease
  • Demonstrated to be a safe, easy, and inexpensive
    way to measure functional capacity/impairment in
    both children and adults

7
Evidence for 6MWT continued
  • Distance walked in the 6MWT has correlated
    significantly with the physiologic cost index,
    lower extremity strength, balance, pre-test pain,
    FVC, and with sub-scores (Physical Function and
    Physical Component Summary) of the SF-36
  • There is normative data for both children and
    adults

8
6MWT in Neuromuscular Disease
  • CONCLUSION The 6MWT has been demonstrated
    reliable, valid and sensitive to change in
    distance walked in children and adults with
    various neuromuscular disorders. These finding
    support the use of the 6MWT as an outcome
    measure/endpoint for ambulatory individuals in
    clinical studies in neuromuscular disease.
  • Further study is recommended to validate the use
    of the 6MWT in the ambulatory SMA population.

9
Evidence Based Literature Review of Outcomes in
SMA III (ambulatory)
  • Inclusion Criteria
  • SMA 5q
  • Patients (not animals or cells)
  • Prospective studies
  • Use of measure/scale/test as related to
    one or
  • more of the following
  • Survival Pulmonary/respiratory
    function
  • Motor function strength
  • Electrophysiological function
  • Quality of life

10
Evidence Based Literature Review cont.
  • Exclusion Criteria
  • No retrospective or single case studies
  • No diagnostic studies with genetics or
    EMG
  • No genetic studies
  • No reviews or meeting reports
  • No cognitive functional measures
  • No surgical studies
  • No sleep studies

11
Reviewing the Outcomes Literature
  • Committee chose a preliminary approach to get a
    handle on the data
  • 1. Sorted data by outcome measure by
    report
  • 2. Sorted outcome measures by ability
    of data on
  • a given measure to contribute to
    clinical trial
  • design

12
Timed Functional Tests
  • Time to walk/run 10 M
  • Time to climb standard stairs
  • Time to arise from floor
  • The above timed tests had one paper with
    sufficient data to perform power calculations.
    Minimal information exists on reliability,
    validity, sensitivity, MCID (minimal clinically
    important difference), and natural history.
  • Time to get up from chair had no information in
    the SMA population though has been used in
    Limb-Girdle Dystrophy natural history studies

13
Functional Scales/Motor Function
  • Of the functional scales recommended (MFM, North
    Star, Expanded Hammersmith, MHFMS-EXTEND) one
    publication on the Hammersmith in SMA III had
    sufficient data for power calculations

14
Number of Falls
  • No published information

15
Strength/Force Production
  • Hand held dynamometry/myometry (HHD)
  • Seven publications have sufficient data for power
    calculations
  • One of the seven documents reliability in their
    own cohort. Other papers reference a paper that
    documents the reliability of HHD in SMA II III
    while looking at the relationship between HHD
    measurements and function

16
Pulmonary Function
  • Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
  • Three publication had sufficient data to perform
    power calculations.
  • One of the above publications documented
    reliability
  • One paper looked at change over time documenting
    limited change over 2-6 years

17
Electrophysiological Evaluation
  • CMAP
  • Two publications had sufficient data for power
    calculations
  • An upcoming presentation will address
    electrophysiological studies in SMA

18
Summary
  • Both literature expert opinion support the use
    of recommended primary secondary outcome
    measures
  • A Quality or Life Measure Patient consensus
    need to be incorporated into the oaradigm
  • Presented outcomes have precedent as being used
    as primary secondary outcomes in presently
    ongoing therapeutic trials in other neuromuscular
    disorders
  • Studies are ongoing that further investigate the
    use of presented outcomes in SMA in therapeutic
    trials
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com