Title: TCO Comparison Analysis Salesforce'com vs' Siebel Onpremise vs' Siebel Ondemand
1TCO Comparison AnalysisSalesforce.com vs. Siebel
On-premise vs. Siebel On-demand
- CRM Program Manager
- Nations Largest Health Management Organization
2Agenda
- Company overview
- Business problems
- Planned solution
- Priority requirements
- TCO analysis
- Siebel On-premise
- Siebel On-demand
- Salesforce.com
- Lessons learned
3Company Overview A Confederation of Feudal States
- Massive organization
- 8.2 Million subscribers
- 1000 internal sales reps
- Distributed Model
- Separately managed divisions in 9 states
Washington D.C. - Diverse selling audience large commercial
accounts, trade unions, brokers - National accounts subject to federal AND state
regulations - Disparate systems
- Access, Excel, ACT!, Goldmine, Onyx, homegrown
systems, index cards - Databases included Oracle, Microsoft and IBM DB2
- Platforms spanned Java, .NET and IBM Websphere
4Business Problems No Unified Processes
- Cross-functional management lacked national
oversight of critical data - Invoices due, division-level discounts, contract
negotiation history - 3-month wait to generate basic business reports
- Sales executives lacked insight into sales
activities - Thousands of new leads generated weekly - no
visibility of conversion rates - No understanding of reasons for deal loss
- Unable to set strategic business goals - "We are
working on X volume of leads to pull in Z
dollars" - Inability to hold reps accountable for poor
performance
- Sales reps had no understanding of key contacts
or their engagement history - 6 sales reps would pursue a single customer
5Solution Planning A Nationwide CRM System
- Considered multiple vendors
- Salesforce.com
- Siebel On-premise
- Siebel On-demand
- Onyx (eliminated due to lack of required
features) - PeopleSoft (distracted by merger, lacked
resources) - Gathered prioritized business requirements
- Conducted TCO analysis to make the right decision
6Requirements Gathering Make it work the way we
sell
Ensure Support for a Relationship Selling Model
- Provide historical data for long sales cycles
- Push customer intelligence into standard SFA
screens - Competitive positioning
- Population data
- Integrate with critical backend systems
- Leverage Web Services as interface to Mainframe
databases - Take a phased approach
- Track 1 Roll-out to Strategic Accounts team,
basic integration - Track 2 integration to Common Members database
- Track 3 ramp up users to 825, Partner Portal for
broker access
7 8Siebel On-premise TCO
9Siebel On-demand TCO
10Salesforce.com TCO
11TCO Summary
8.7M
3.1M
1.2M
Siebel On-premise
Siebel On-demand
Salesforce.com
- Primary cost contributors
- Siebel On-premise
- 3 separate environments, customization
integration, PC upgrades - Siebel On-demand
- 6 month investment in customization
configuration, solution failure
12Lessons Learned
- Extend your requirements gathering beyond Sales
- Take the time to do the math
- Do not underestimate the time expense required
to make the solution adapt to your business needs - Discourage rogue deployments