Optimising Low and Zero Carbon Technologies in the NHS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Optimising Low and Zero Carbon Technologies in the NHS

Description:

Fabric, HVAC, Lighting, Intellegent Controls, Behaviour. Often cheap to apply - gives fast payback ... 250 geothermal heating boreholes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: hal4157
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Optimising Low and Zero Carbon Technologies in the NHS


1
Optimising Low and Zero Carbon Technologies in
the NHS
  • Chris Hall
  • Environmental Advisor
  • Sustainable Development

2
Contents
  • Meeting the zero carbon challenge
  • Review of low and zero carbon technologies (LZCT)
  • Solar Thermal - ST
  • Photovoltaic's - PV
  • Combined Heat and power - CHP
  • Ground source heat pumps - GSHP
  • Biomass (wood to heat)
  • Wind.
  • Application to the NHS
  • Rules of thumb

3
Steps to zero carbon
  • 1. Conservation
  • Fabric, HVAC, Lighting, Intellegent Controls,
    Behaviour
  • Often cheap to apply - gives fast payback
  • Requires smallest change in consumer attitudes
  • 2. LZCT
  • Solar, Wind, Hydro, Biomass, Heat Pumps, CHP
  • More investment required -gt slower payback
  • Requires larger shift in attitudes
  • Changes in economics
  • 3. Community schemes
  • 4. Carbon trading

4
Issues to consider
  • Passive opportunities maximised
  • Services should be correctly sized and integrated
    so that servicing will be minimised.
  • Identification of need for cooling energy on site
    and how this may be best achieved
  • Use of energy simulation techniques for each
    building on site to inform site energy strategy.
  • Consideration of the use and integration of
    renewables
  • Whole life costing/ payback
  • Carbon intensity of displaced mains electricity

5
Carbon outcomes from modelling the NHS estate
  • Performance of existing buildings
    145KgCO2/m2
  • Best practice outcome existing estate
    110KgCO2/m2
  • New buildings compliant with UK Building
  • Regulations (Part L) 95KgCO2/m2
  • New build Best practice building scenario
    70KgCO2/m2
  • Best possible case including LZCT
    50KgCO2/m2

6
Solar Insolation Map - annual kWh/m2
Annual solar energy on horizontal plane kWh/m2
Ubbink Nederland
7
Active solar thermal technology check
  • A typical system comprises
  • Collector
  • Fluid (water with anti-freeze)
  • Heat exchanger
  • Control system (temperature sensor and electric
    pump)

8
Solar thermal technology check
There are two types of collectors..
  • Evacuated tube
  • Flat plate
  • evacuated tube collectors have
  • greater efficiency (up to 65).
  • flat plate collectors are cheaper
  • of the two (typically 2,500 for a
  • 4m2 panel)
  • Should comply with BS EN12975

9
Potential for Solar thermal
  • Up to 50 of NHS DHW demand could be met by ST
  • Results show 1/5th of NHS would meet NHS DHW
    needs
  • Typical costs 800 /m2, this equates to around
    880m across the NHS Estate

10
Photovoltaic applications
  • Mounted on roofs or walls
  • Roof tiles
  • Integrated into blinds or glazing
  • Independent of the building
  • Street furniture

PV / ST The relative energy output of PV to
ST for any given area of collector can be around
2.5 to 6 less resulting in a 1/3 of the CO2
saving from PVs than from ST
11
Photovoltaic technologies
  • Crystalline Silicon (mono- and poly- types )
  • Amorphous Silicon (thin film)
  • Rating
  • In Watts Peak (Wp)
  • Crystalline approx 100Wp/m2
  • Amorphous - approx 60Wp/m2

12
Photo voltaic assumptions and carbon savings
  • Yield 850 kWh/kWp
  • Grid displaced electricity factor 0.568 kgCO2/kWh
  • The relative energy output of PV to ST for any
    given area of collector can be around 2.5 to 6
    times smaller saving 1/3 of the CO2 savings from
    ST
  • Typical PV costs 850 /m2.
  • Cost to NHS 1,732.5m

13
Norfolk NHS Acute Adult Units
  • Solar hot water collectors
  • Saving by solar 14 20
  • Equivalent to 6.38 tonnes of CO2 emissions saved
  • Photovoltaics
  • South facing arrays 200m2 each unit
  • Supply about 25 of each buildings electricity
    demand

14
CHP technology check
  • A revenue creating device
  • To be cost effective CHP requires
  • the plant to operate for long hours gt 4500hrs/a
    to achieve economic pay back.
  • A significant difference between fossil fuel and
    electricity costs/ kWh.
  • Cost 750/kWe
  • Gas reciprocating engines likely to provide the
    most robust solution
  • Maximise heat loads available to the CHP
  • Dont oversize - do the energy efficiency
    measures first
  • Maximise the hours run
  • Maintain it
  • Consider finance options

15
Potential for CHP in the NHS based on 2006/7 NHS
ERIC energy returns
  • Current CHP installed capacity 100MWe
  • Potential for CHP 70 MWe
  • CHP potential is equivalent to 1.85 of all NHS
    CO2 emissions equivalent to 65,000 tonnes of CO2
    annually
  • 4000 tonnes of CO2 could be saved by improving
    the performance of existing CHP.
  • 6 of the NHS CHP was achieving 78 efficiency
  • CO2 savings only became apparent at CHP
    efficiencies of around 65
  • 72 efficiency with around 4 CO2
  • 78 efficiency with around 8 CO2 savings

16
CHP potential based on the 2006/7 ERIC analysis
17
CHP outcomes based on modelling changes to the
NHS estate
  • Saving in emissions 4.7 KgCO2/m2.
  • As performance of buildings and heating increases
    CHP potential falls

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
18
Heat pumps
  • Extracting low-grade heat from surrounding
    ground, air or water and converting it to higher
    grade heat for buildings
  • Electrically powered, but provides more energy as
    heat than it consumes as electricity
  • Significant savings in CO2 emissions
  • Several types of heat pump technology
  • Ground source
  • Water source
  • Air source

19
Potential for ground source heat pumps
  • Need ground space so more applicable to non Urban
    sites
  • The laws of thermodynamics mean that heat pumps
    are most energy efficient when temperature
    differences between the collector and emitter are
    low.
  • Building heating and cooling systems need to be
    designed to work with this fact.
  • if seasonal COP drops below 2.5, the use of GSHP
    increases CO2 emissions when compared to
    efficient gas boilers

20
GSHP technology check
  • If applied 100 of potentially could reduce
    emissions by 3.88kgCO2/m2
  • If applied 80 potentially could reduce
    emissions by 3.1kgCO2/m2

21
Hellesdon hospital
  • 100kW system
  • 120 boreholes

22
Case study
  • Churchill Hospital, Oxford
  • Ground source heat pump system
  • 250 geothermal heating boreholes
  • Twenty internal heat pumps each 100kW to provide
    heating and cooling to the hospital
  • Each borehole will be 130mm in diameter and 135
    metres deep
  • Polyethylene pipework system externally
  • Around 2/3 cost of conventional boiler and
    chiller system
  • Around 37 reduction in running costs

23
Potential savings from Biomass
  • Assumptions
  • Rural areas and the edges of urban areas and
    hospitals with large sites
  • Leading to an annual consumption of 8000GWh/a
    requiring 4 Mtonnes of wood chips annually

24
Biomass
  • Wood or crop waste
  • Limited supply
  • Woodchip cheaper than gas / kWh
  • Biomass as lead boiler(s)
  • Typically sized for 100DHW
  • and 40 space heating
  • Costs 300/kW installed
  • for larger installations

25
Wind Power
  • http//www.bwea.com/noabl/download.htm
  • Modelled on 1km grid squares
  • Scotland, Wales, NI well blessed!
  • Always datalog first for large projects
  • Power Cube Law 1/2 x Ro x Swept area
  • x V3
  • Betz limit of 59
  • Machine performance usually less
  • Check your wind speed!
  • Need clearance of 5-10 rotor diameters
  • mean annual wind speeds are available for 10, 25
    and 45m above sea level

26
Wind power
  • Power generated by
  • Single turbines
  • Small clusters
  • Wind farms
  • The taller the tower, the greater the power
  • Can be stand-alone or grid connected

Estimated annual energy output at wind turbine
hub height (in thousand kWh/yr)
27
Assumptions and carbonsavings from wind
generation
Antrim Area Hospital 660kW wind turbine generator
28
Case study wind energy
Wind farm feasibility at HMP Haverigg, Cumbria
  • Exposed headland, av. wind speed 7.3 m/s
  • Loads 120-600 kW, annual energy 2287 MWh
  • 850 kW installed wind capacity recommended
    (530k)
  • equates to annual average power 295 kW
  • annual energy 1516 MWh on site
  • export of 1060 MWh to grid predicted
  • Net annual benefit to HMP 14.5k
  • Existing row of wind turbines on adjacent
    farmland, local planners, etc., have no
    objections

29
Grant support /feed in tariffs
  • LCBP -www.lowcarbonbuildings.org.uk
  • 50 grants
  • Feed-in tariffs reward the generation of
    renewable electricity from April 2010 up to 5 MW
    Including
  • Wind
  • Solar photovoltaics (PV)
  • Hydro
  • Anaerobic digestion
  • Biomass and biomass combined heat and power (CHP)
  • Non-renewable micro-CHP.
  • Renewable Electivity Financial Incentives
    consultation
  • Renewable heat incentive (RHI) rewards the
    generation of renewable heat from 2011.

30
Contacts
  • Renewable Energy Association www.r-p-a.org.uk
  • British Photovoltaic Association
    www.pv-uk.org.uk
  • The National Energy Foundation www.nef.org.uk
  • Low Carbon buildings programme
    www.lowcarbonbuildings.org.uk
  • Energy Saving Trust http//www.energysavingtrust
    .org.uk
  • BRE Consultancy www.bre.co.uk
  • UK Microgeneration Certification Scheme
    www.ukmicrogeneration.org

31
Conclusions
  • Its cheaper to save energy than to generate new!
  • Technologies are at different stages of
    development, which in turn affects costs.
  • Renewable energy should be seen as integral in
    the solution
  • Energy efficiency
  • Renewable energy
  • Efficient fossil fuel use

32
More information
  • buildingdesignconsultancy_at_bre.co.uk
  • 01923 664290
  • On the IHEEM Sustainability stand
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com