Promoting Regionalism in Cleveland: Regional Solutions for 21st Century Challenges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Promoting Regionalism in Cleveland: Regional Solutions for 21st Century Challenges

Description:

Williams Chair in Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, Moritz College of Law ... Many autonomous local governments directing policy based on an insular perspective ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: kirw3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Promoting Regionalism in Cleveland: Regional Solutions for 21st Century Challenges


1
Promoting Regionalism in Cleveland Regional
Solutions for 21st Century Challenges
Presentation for Regional Minority Forum November
30th 2004
  • john a. powell
  • Williams Chair in Civil Rights Civil Liberties,
    Moritz College of Law
  • Director, Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race
    and Ethnicity
  • The Ohio State University
  • http//www.kirwaninstitute.org/

2
Overview of Todays Presentation
  • What issues are impacting the health of the
    Cleveland region?
  • Why is regionalism the solution?
  • What does regionalism include?
  • How do we measure the impact of regionalism?
  • Are there concerns about regionalism?
  • How do we build upon existing successful
    initiatives?
  • What should been done to promote regionalism?

3
The Challenge for Cleveland and Other Midwestern
Regions
  • The challenges faced by Cleveland are not
    entirely unique
  • Geography What Cleveland is facing is part of a
    larger phenomena impacting the rust belt and
    other Midwestern states
  • Population loss aging population, brain drain
    of the young and educated, central city
    population loss
  • Every working age person in Cleveland supports 70
    children and seniors
  • Economic transition and job loss
  • Regional fragmentation
  • Tremendous segregation
  • Sprawl and urban decline

The Core Rust Belt Region
4
Regionalism in an Undercapitalized City
  • Cleveland (like many Midwestern and Northeastern
    Cities) is an undercapitalized city with
    significant urban decline, racial inequity and
    limited new investment
  • Other large undercapitalized cities include
    Detroit, St. Louis, Pittsburg, Philadelphia,
    Baltimore, Newark.
  • As an undercapitalized city, Cleveland requires
    an unique approach to promoting regionalism and
    equity
  • Strategies that may work in hot market cities
    such as Seattle, Austin or San Francisco may not
    work in Cleveland.need for a more strategic
    approach

5
Characteristics of Undercapitalized Cities
  • Characteristics
  • Population decline or stagnation
  • Significant regional land use consumption but
    stagnant population growth
  • Home value depreciation or stagnation
  • High poverty, disrupted social networks and
    concentrated poverty
  • Vacant land and declining tax base
  • Employment de-concentration and limited new
    commercial/residential investment
  • Single gentrified neighborhood may exist, but
    majority of neighborhoods are in decline

Please Reference Building a New Framework for
Community Development in Weak Market Cities,
prepared by Community Development Partnership
Network (April 2003)
6
Threats for Undercapitalized Cities
  • Threats
  • Continued disinvestment and decline
  • Inability for the region to compete in the global
    economy
  • Continued isolation of central city residents
    from opportunity and investment
  • Existing tools for community development and
    economic development (place-based strategies) may
    be accelerating central city decline

Please Reference Building a New Framework for
Community Development in Weak Market Cities,
prepared by Community Development Partnership
Network (April 2003)
7
Sprawl and Urban Decline in Cleveland and the
Region
  • Clevelands population declined by 37.3 between
    1970 and 2000.
  • The Cleveland MSA lost 7.5 of its population
    during this time
  • Urban Sprawl
  • The Cleveland-Akron-Lorain CMSA experienced
    population growth of less than 1 between 1982
    and 1997 but had an increase in urban land of 37
  • Job Sprawl
  • Clevelands employment has decentralized, with
    less than 15 of regional employment within 3
    miles of the Central Business District and 44 of
    employment more than ten miles from the CBD

8
Urban Decline is not just a City of Cleveland
Issue
  • Decline is spreading to older suburbs in the
    Cleveland region
  • Seven of Clevelands older suburban communities
    lost residents in the 1990s
  • Older suburban communities will soon face many of
    the problems associated with the central city

The suburbs in red lost population in the 1990s.
Including East Cleveland, Brook Park, Lakewood,
Shaker Heights, Bedford, Euclid and Garfield
Heights
9
Middle Class Population Loss and Concentrated
Poverty
  • Areas in dark red represent the large
    concentration of poverty in the central city
    (areas with poverty rates of 30 or more)
  • Population losses are exasperated by the loss of
    the middle class from the central city
  • The City of Clevelands middle income households
    (earning 35K to 52K) decreased by 9 in the
    1990s

Source Brookings Institute Living Census Data
Book
10
Economic Transition and Globalization
  • The current recession combined with economic
    transition from globalization has resulted in
    significant economic change in Cleveland
  • Unemployment in the Cleveland region and Cuyahoga
    County has risen by 50 since 2000
  • Cuyahoga County lost 16,200 jobs between 2000 and
    2003
  • Manufacturing job losses are the greatest share
    of job loss in Cuyahoga County
  • Manufacturing employment in Cuyahoga County
    declined by 29 between 1996 and 2002 (resulting
    in a loss of more than 40,000 manufacturing jobs)

Source Ohio Department of Job and Family Services
11
Racial Disparity Segregation From Opportunity
  • Sprawl exasperates the racial (residential)
    segregation of Cleveland and other major
    Midwestern cities
  • 77 of African Americans in the Cleveland region
    would need to relocate to desegregate the region
  • The Cleveland region is the seventh most racially
    segregated region in the nation
  • Residential segregation is really a proxy for
    segregation from opportunity for Clevelands
    African American (and Hispanic) residents

Source Lewis Mumford Center, Dissimilarity Index
for all Regions.
12
African American Residential Segregation in
Cleveland
  • The African American population is highly
    concentrated in Cleveland
  • Areas in dark red represent census tracts that
    are more than 30 African American

Source Brookings Institute Living Census Data
Book
13
Segregation From Employment Growth
  • Between 1996 and 2002 marginal job growth
    occurred in Cuyahoga County and employment
    decreased substantially in the Manufacturing
    Sector
  • In contrast, job growth has been greatest (and
    manufacturing job losses the smallest) in some of
    the surrounding suburban counties

14
Racial Disparity Segregation From Opportunity
  • Segregation from Opportunity
  • Segregation for Clevelands minority residents
    fuels the substantial racial disparities (and
    racial/social inequity) found in the region
  • African Americans in the Cleveland region in
    2000
  • Had 60 of the median income of Whites
  • Had poverty rates 300 higher than Whites
  • Had 250 higher unemployment
  • Lived in neighborhoods with twice as much vacant
    abandoned housing
  • Had homeownership rates that were 33 lower than
    Whites
  • Lived in communities with a lower tax base
  • Central city communities in the Cleveland region
    have per household residential taxable values
    that are half of the regional average

15
Urban Hardship in the Rust Belt
  • Despite the challenges shared by the rust belt,
    urban hardship (based on poverty, economic
    health, investment and population change) varies
    significantly by region and several rust belt
    regions are performing wellwhy?

Source An Update on Urban Hardship The Nelson
A. Rockefeller Institute of Government. State
University of New York. 2004
Most Hardship
Least Hardship
16
Is it Regionalism?
  • Some Midwestern regions who have implemented
    regionalism based initiatives are showing less
    indications of distress
  • Columbus Proactive annexation policies
  • Indianapolis Government consolidation and more
    recent education and transportation reforms
  • Minneapolis Tax revenue sharing and recent
    school equalization

17
What is Regionalism?
  • Regionalism an approach that emphasizes the
    region as the primary geographic unit determining
    the distribution of opportunity and resources
  • Consequently the region is the best geographic
    entity to base some level of decision-making
  • Can work to enforce inequity or improve equity,
    depending on the focus of regionalism
  • What is the focus?
  • Economic efficiency, fiscal efficiency,
    infrastructure efficiency, environmental quality,
    racial social equity
  • These goals can work in concert or in conflict
  • When goals are aligned to combat inequity,
    regionalism can be powerfully effective in
    addressing racial disparities

18
Is Regionalism the Solution?
  • Regionalism
  • Regional strategies can be effective solutions to
    addressing the issues impacting Cleveland and
    other major regions
  • Racial and social inequity
  • Urban/exurban sprawl
  • Jurisdictional fragmentation
  • Central city disinvestment
  • Fiscal distress
  • Economic transition/globalization

19
Why Focus on the Region?
  • The importance of the region
  • The spatial orientation of todays economy,
    housing market, infrastructure, and labor market
    are no longer locally focused
  • Local conditions are under the influence of
    regional forces outside of local control, such as
    globalization
  • There is a need for structures and solutions to
    better link city/suburb/exurb and reflect the
    regional economy
  • Local initiatives alone are not enough

20
What is Regionalism Addressing? Fragmentation and
Localism
  • Fragmentation The fracturing of a region into
    multiple autonomous local jurisdictions of local
    government
  • Localism is synonymous with fragmentation
  • Many autonomous local governments directing
    policy based on an insular perspective
  • Fragmentation and localism results in decision
    making that is good at the local level but
    detrimental to the region
  • Decision making is on the local level
  • Opportunities are allocated on a regional level,
    beyond local control
  • Economic opportunity, labor force, housing
    opportunity, educational opportunity
  • This creates less than optimal decisions for the
    region

21
How does Fragmentation and Localism Impact the
Region?
  • Fragmentation and localism have worked on a
    structural level to maintain and reinforce racial
    and social inequity, encourage sprawl and central
    city abandonment
  • Political fragmentation and localism exasperate
    the flow of resources to the urban periphery as
    communities compete over commercial investment
    and high income population (the favored quarter)
  • Fragmentation allows communities to sort what
    people and business they wish to attract
    (strengthen economic and social isolation and
    segregation)
  • Fragmentation not only harms communities of color
    but harms everyone in the region by.
  • Driving up housing costs (through exclusionary
    zoning)
  • Limiting regional economic growth and investment
  • Creating higher tax burdens for all regional
    residents (due to the inefficiency in government
    services and disparity in community resources)

22
Fragmentation Creates Dysfunctional Regions
  • Fragmentation makes the region less economically
    competitive by restraining the labor market and
    discouraging a unified regional economic
    development strategy
  • Fragmentation creates substantial redundancy in
    government services, creating fiscal
    inefficiencies for the entire region (and
    ultimately impacting the regions taxpayers)
  • Fragmentation has created dysfunctional regions,
    with mobility restricted for poor residents,
    infrastructure illogically distributed and
    communities fighting over investment
  • This not only works to harm the regions residents
    (especially communities of color) but limits the
    economic vitality and competitiveness of the
    entire region

23
Globalization, Fragmentation and Regionalism
  • Globalization has heightened the need for
    regionalism and compounded the problems
    associated with fragmentation
  • As national trade restrictions are relaxed,
    regions become the primary economic actors,
    competing globally for investment
  • Capital investment is no longer tied to a
    particular place, creating zero sum competition
    between local governments for investment
  • Fragmentation fuels this competition at the
    expense of the entire region
  • Fragmentation also creates an incoherent
    framework for the region to address this economic
    challenge

24
Globalization, Fragmentation and Regionalism
  • The region not only competes globally for
    investment but now must compete nationally and
    globally for population
  • The global economic competitiveness of the
    Cleveland region is impacted by the brain drain
    of young educated workers to other regions within
    the United States
  • International immigration of skilled workers is
    one approach to counter this trend
  • International immigration has also proven to be
    one of the driving forces for economic growth
    (and population growth) in many declining central
    cities
  • The region must compete for these new residents
    and develop a coherent regional strategy to meet
    this goal

25
What Does Regionalism Look Like?
  • There are multiple regional strategies (or
    structures) to address fragmentation, sprawl,
    economic change inequity and fiscal distress
  • Regional Governance
  • Annexation
  • Mergers Consolidation
  • Regional Functions
  • Tax base or other forms of revenue sharing
  • Opening the regional housing market
  • Regional land use control
  • Regional Infrastructure
  • Infrastructure related growth management
  • Each region must choose which strategies would
    work best based on needs and the potential impact

26
Understanding Types of Regionalism
  • Most regionalism initiatives can be placed into
    four categories
  • Coordinating Regionalism
  • Regional coordination around specific issues
    (transportation, housing, land use)
  • Examples Metropolitan Planning Organizations,
    Regional land use authorities (Portland)
  • Administrative Regionalism
  • Special districts and inter-local government
    agreements to tackle regional problems
  • Examples Multi-jurisdictional service areas for
    infrastructure and public services, service
    agreements between local governments
  • Structural Regionalism
  • Physically rearranging local government
    boundaries to create a larger regional body
  • Examples Annexation policies, consolidations and
    municipal mergers
  • Fiscal Regionalism
  • Strategies to share the cost and benefits from
    development, and address inequity in local
    community resources
  • Examples All revenue sharing strategies tax
    base sharing, cultural asset districts, employee
    based taxing strategies

Models of regionalism adapted from The Regional
Governing of Metropolitan America by David
Miller at the University of Pittsburgh (2002).
27
Understanding Types of Regionalism
  • Which of these approaches already exist in
    Cleveland and what future approaches would be
    appropriate?
  • Coordinating Regionalism
  • Cleveland Example The NE Ohio metropolitan
    planning organization's work in coordinating
    transportation investment
  • Potential Could a regional coordinating agency
    focus on regional affordable housing?
  • Administrative Regionalism
  • Cleveland Example Greater Cleveland regional
    transit authority, Cleveland Metro Parks,
    Inter-governmental agreements to share road salt
  • Potential Could a regionalized public water and
    sewer agency plan for regional infrastructure
    needs?
  • Structural Regionalism
  • Cleveland Example None
  • Potential Mergers of smaller local government or
    merging local school districts?
  • Fiscal Regionalism
  • Cleveland Example Earnings tax
  • Potential Could tax base sharing be applied to
    the region?

28
How should we measure the potential impact of
regionalism based initiatives?
  • Look at the impact on regional fragmentation
  • What fragmented regional functions or structures
    will be improved?
  • Look at the land area impacted
  • How much of the region will be impacted?
  • Is this where growth is currently occurring or
    will occur?
  • Look at the impact on the regions population
  • How will the regions population be impacted?
    Will disenfranchised communities see their
    opportunities and mobility improved?
  • Can power dilution be avoided for communities of
    color?

29
Concerns about regionalism
  • Often regions rush to regional governmental/struct
    ural solutions (such as consolidation) without
    exploring other cooperative intergovernmental
    strategies
  • There may be significant resistance of
    communities of color to adopting this approach
  • Why?
  • Communities of color and low-income communities
    can be further marginalized through power
    dilution from government consolidation and
    mergers
  • Regionalism may not explicitly target the issues
    impacting racial equity (such as housing,
    education and tax base)

30
Power dilution from regionalism
  • Minority representation dilution
  • In most regions, consolidation reforms have
    resulted in a reduction in the concentration of
    African American voters (and in some cases
    elected political representation)
  • Indianapolis Unigov
  • Schools originally not addressed in
    consolidation, fragmented tax districts also
    maintained and created political
    disenfranchisement of African American community
  • Louisville Consolidation
  • Recent research has found suburban political
    interests (and development) dominate the
    political agenda at the expense of African
    American central city neighborhoods

31
Can regionalism exist without regional government
or consolidation?
  • Yes
  • Intergovernmental arrangements can address
    fragmentation and inequity without resulting in
    power dilution for communities of color
  • Example Pre-consolidation Louisville
  • Prior to the consolidation in Louisville, the
    city and county developed an agreement to share
    occupational tax revenues and jointly manage land
    use planning and development
  • During the this time period, investment increased
    significantly in Louisville and indicators of
    disparity were improved
  • Example Minneapolis-St. Paul
  • The twin cities region remains highly fragmented
    (the 2nd most fragmented region per capita
    nationally) but equity has been improved through
    regionalized tax base sharing
  • Additional initiatives to equalize school funding
    have also improved equity

32
Addressing key equity issues
  • Not all regional intergovernmental arrangements
    are positive for communities of color
  • Arrangements that ignore the key issues fueling
    inequity (housing, education, fiscal inequity)
    allow inequity to continue unabated
  • Regionalism must address these key issues,
    especially if support is to be gained from the
    central city
  • If regionalism is to work in Northeast Ohio,
    Clevelands suburbs must help the city deal with
    unemployment, homelessness and a cash-strapped
    school systemwere wasting our time if we
    dont deal with the substantive things
  • Cleveland City Council president Frank Jackson on
    his concerns about consolidating public services
    in Cleveland
  • .if regionalism isnt dealing with land use,
    fiscal disparities, housing and education then
    regionalism isnt dealing with the issues that
    count"
  • David Rusk (2002)

33
How do we build upon existing successful
initiatives?
  • Cleveland has had many successes in combating
    sprawl and fragmentation and promoting equity
  • Land Bank
  • Downtown Revitalization
  • Business Leaders Promoting A Regional Approach
  • Revenue Sharing
  • Transportation
  • Philanthropic Initiatives
  • Can these initiatives be built upon (or
    coordinated) to further promote regionalism?

34
Initiatives in Cleveland
  • Land Bank
  • Along with Atlanta, Cleveland has one of the best
    land bank programs in the nation. This is key to
    promoting infill development
  • Downtown Revitalization
  • In the 1990s Cleveland was one of the most
    successful cities in the Midwest in attracting
    reinvestment back into its downtown

35
Initiatives in Cleveland
  • Greater Cleveland Partnership Business Leaders
    Promoting a Regional Approach
  • The private sector can have a significant role in
    regionalism initiatives
  • A regional business leadership initiative can not
    only promote job growth in the region but also
    address issues related to equity
  • Chicago Spurred by labor shortages, the business
    leaders in the Chicago region have worked to
    expand the supply of workforce housing

36
Initiatives in Cleveland
  • Revenue Sharing
  • No tax base sharing occurs in relation to
    property taxes but a revenue sharing structure
    exists in respect to the earnings tax (Taxes
    paid by employees from other jurisdictions who
    pay taxes in the municipality they work in)
  • But for this policy to continue to be successful
    it depends on employment staying concentrated
    within the City of Cleveland
  • In addition, recent downtown infrastructure
    (stadiums etc.) is funded by both the suburban
    communities and the City of Cleveland
  • Providing another significant example of revenue
    sharing structure for the region

37
Initiatives in Cleveland
  • Transportation Policy
  • The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
    involves regional cooperation (within Cuyahoga
    County)
  • The regions metropolitan planning organization
    Northeast Ohio Area-wide Coordinating Agency
    (NOACA) provides regional transportation planning
    for five counties in Northeast Ohio

38
Philanthropic Initiatives in Cleveland
  • Foundations in Cleveland have targeted resources
    into exploring regionalism for the region
  • The George Gund Foundation and others have pooled
    resources to improve the regions economic
    climate
  • The Cleveland Foundation recently funded the
    Presidents Council (an African American business
    leadership organization) to research how African
    Americans can play a role in and benefit from
    regionalism in Cleveland
  • The George Gund Foundation provided funding for
    research analyzing how regionalism could impact
    health and human services organizations in
    Cleveland

39
What should be done?
  • Coalition Building
  • Coalitions are critical if regional initiatives
    and consolidation are going to gain popular
    support
  • Consider building support among key stakeholders
  • The business community, labor community
  • The private sector can have a significant role in
    regionalism initiatives
  • Distressed older suburban communities
  • Social justice faith-based organizations
  • Affordable housing advocates
  • Smart growth and environmental advocates

40
What should be done?
  • Grab the lowest fruit on the tree
  • Identify possible turning points or critical
    interventions.
  • For example, is home ownership a good way to
    address housing disparity? How do you structure
    and use other resources to accomplish this?
  • Work with the existing regional structures in
    Cleveland to promote equity issues and
    regionalism
  • Example Metropolitan Planning Organization,
    Regional Business Organization, Existing Revenue
    Sharing Structures

41
What should be done?
  • Examine the impact of all regionalism proposals
    before supporting
  • How will fragmentation be impacted? What
    populations and land area will be impacted? The
    impact on communities of color?
  • Do not rush to regional government/structural
    solutions such as consolidation without exploring
    all options
  • A multi-faceted approach (of multiple regional
    initiatives) may be necessary
  • Consider the large number of intergovernmental
    cooperation strategies (functional solutions)
  • These may prove more effective, meet less
    resistance and avoid power dilution for
    communities of color
  • But.these must address the principle issues
    impacting racial equity such as housing, schools
    and tax base

42
For More Information Visit us on-line at
http//www.kirwaninstitute.org/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com