Title: Promoting Regionalism in Cleveland: Regional Solutions for 21st Century Challenges
1Promoting Regionalism in Cleveland Regional
Solutions for 21st Century Challenges
Presentation for Regional Minority Forum November
30th 2004
- john a. powell
- Williams Chair in Civil Rights Civil Liberties,
Moritz College of Law - Director, Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race
and Ethnicity - The Ohio State University
- http//www.kirwaninstitute.org/
-
2Overview of Todays Presentation
- What issues are impacting the health of the
Cleveland region? - Why is regionalism the solution?
- What does regionalism include?
- How do we measure the impact of regionalism?
- Are there concerns about regionalism?
- How do we build upon existing successful
initiatives? - What should been done to promote regionalism?
3The Challenge for Cleveland and Other Midwestern
Regions
- The challenges faced by Cleveland are not
entirely unique - Geography What Cleveland is facing is part of a
larger phenomena impacting the rust belt and
other Midwestern states - Population loss aging population, brain drain
of the young and educated, central city
population loss - Every working age person in Cleveland supports 70
children and seniors - Economic transition and job loss
- Regional fragmentation
- Tremendous segregation
- Sprawl and urban decline
The Core Rust Belt Region
4Regionalism in an Undercapitalized City
- Cleveland (like many Midwestern and Northeastern
Cities) is an undercapitalized city with
significant urban decline, racial inequity and
limited new investment - Other large undercapitalized cities include
Detroit, St. Louis, Pittsburg, Philadelphia,
Baltimore, Newark. - As an undercapitalized city, Cleveland requires
an unique approach to promoting regionalism and
equity - Strategies that may work in hot market cities
such as Seattle, Austin or San Francisco may not
work in Cleveland.need for a more strategic
approach
5Characteristics of Undercapitalized Cities
- Characteristics
- Population decline or stagnation
- Significant regional land use consumption but
stagnant population growth - Home value depreciation or stagnation
- High poverty, disrupted social networks and
concentrated poverty - Vacant land and declining tax base
- Employment de-concentration and limited new
commercial/residential investment - Single gentrified neighborhood may exist, but
majority of neighborhoods are in decline
Please Reference Building a New Framework for
Community Development in Weak Market Cities,
prepared by Community Development Partnership
Network (April 2003)
6Threats for Undercapitalized Cities
- Threats
- Continued disinvestment and decline
- Inability for the region to compete in the global
economy - Continued isolation of central city residents
from opportunity and investment - Existing tools for community development and
economic development (place-based strategies) may
be accelerating central city decline
Please Reference Building a New Framework for
Community Development in Weak Market Cities,
prepared by Community Development Partnership
Network (April 2003)
7Sprawl and Urban Decline in Cleveland and the
Region
- Clevelands population declined by 37.3 between
1970 and 2000. - The Cleveland MSA lost 7.5 of its population
during this time - Urban Sprawl
- The Cleveland-Akron-Lorain CMSA experienced
population growth of less than 1 between 1982
and 1997 but had an increase in urban land of 37 - Job Sprawl
- Clevelands employment has decentralized, with
less than 15 of regional employment within 3
miles of the Central Business District and 44 of
employment more than ten miles from the CBD
8Urban Decline is not just a City of Cleveland
Issue
- Decline is spreading to older suburbs in the
Cleveland region - Seven of Clevelands older suburban communities
lost residents in the 1990s - Older suburban communities will soon face many of
the problems associated with the central city
The suburbs in red lost population in the 1990s.
Including East Cleveland, Brook Park, Lakewood,
Shaker Heights, Bedford, Euclid and Garfield
Heights
9Middle Class Population Loss and Concentrated
Poverty
- Areas in dark red represent the large
concentration of poverty in the central city
(areas with poverty rates of 30 or more) - Population losses are exasperated by the loss of
the middle class from the central city - The City of Clevelands middle income households
(earning 35K to 52K) decreased by 9 in the
1990s
Source Brookings Institute Living Census Data
Book
10Economic Transition and Globalization
- The current recession combined with economic
transition from globalization has resulted in
significant economic change in Cleveland - Unemployment in the Cleveland region and Cuyahoga
County has risen by 50 since 2000 - Cuyahoga County lost 16,200 jobs between 2000 and
2003 - Manufacturing job losses are the greatest share
of job loss in Cuyahoga County - Manufacturing employment in Cuyahoga County
declined by 29 between 1996 and 2002 (resulting
in a loss of more than 40,000 manufacturing jobs)
Source Ohio Department of Job and Family Services
11Racial Disparity Segregation From Opportunity
- Sprawl exasperates the racial (residential)
segregation of Cleveland and other major
Midwestern cities - 77 of African Americans in the Cleveland region
would need to relocate to desegregate the region - The Cleveland region is the seventh most racially
segregated region in the nation - Residential segregation is really a proxy for
segregation from opportunity for Clevelands
African American (and Hispanic) residents
Source Lewis Mumford Center, Dissimilarity Index
for all Regions.
12African American Residential Segregation in
Cleveland
- The African American population is highly
concentrated in Cleveland - Areas in dark red represent census tracts that
are more than 30 African American
Source Brookings Institute Living Census Data
Book
13Segregation From Employment Growth
- Between 1996 and 2002 marginal job growth
occurred in Cuyahoga County and employment
decreased substantially in the Manufacturing
Sector - In contrast, job growth has been greatest (and
manufacturing job losses the smallest) in some of
the surrounding suburban counties
14Racial Disparity Segregation From Opportunity
- Segregation from Opportunity
- Segregation for Clevelands minority residents
fuels the substantial racial disparities (and
racial/social inequity) found in the region - African Americans in the Cleveland region in
2000 - Had 60 of the median income of Whites
- Had poverty rates 300 higher than Whites
- Had 250 higher unemployment
- Lived in neighborhoods with twice as much vacant
abandoned housing - Had homeownership rates that were 33 lower than
Whites - Lived in communities with a lower tax base
- Central city communities in the Cleveland region
have per household residential taxable values
that are half of the regional average
15Urban Hardship in the Rust Belt
- Despite the challenges shared by the rust belt,
urban hardship (based on poverty, economic
health, investment and population change) varies
significantly by region and several rust belt
regions are performing wellwhy?
Source An Update on Urban Hardship The Nelson
A. Rockefeller Institute of Government. State
University of New York. 2004
Most Hardship
Least Hardship
16Is it Regionalism?
- Some Midwestern regions who have implemented
regionalism based initiatives are showing less
indications of distress - Columbus Proactive annexation policies
- Indianapolis Government consolidation and more
recent education and transportation reforms - Minneapolis Tax revenue sharing and recent
school equalization
17What is Regionalism?
- Regionalism an approach that emphasizes the
region as the primary geographic unit determining
the distribution of opportunity and resources - Consequently the region is the best geographic
entity to base some level of decision-making - Can work to enforce inequity or improve equity,
depending on the focus of regionalism - What is the focus?
- Economic efficiency, fiscal efficiency,
infrastructure efficiency, environmental quality,
racial social equity - These goals can work in concert or in conflict
- When goals are aligned to combat inequity,
regionalism can be powerfully effective in
addressing racial disparities
18Is Regionalism the Solution?
- Regionalism
- Regional strategies can be effective solutions to
addressing the issues impacting Cleveland and
other major regions - Racial and social inequity
- Urban/exurban sprawl
- Jurisdictional fragmentation
- Central city disinvestment
- Fiscal distress
- Economic transition/globalization
19Why Focus on the Region?
- The importance of the region
- The spatial orientation of todays economy,
housing market, infrastructure, and labor market
are no longer locally focused - Local conditions are under the influence of
regional forces outside of local control, such as
globalization - There is a need for structures and solutions to
better link city/suburb/exurb and reflect the
regional economy - Local initiatives alone are not enough
20What is Regionalism Addressing? Fragmentation and
Localism
- Fragmentation The fracturing of a region into
multiple autonomous local jurisdictions of local
government - Localism is synonymous with fragmentation
- Many autonomous local governments directing
policy based on an insular perspective - Fragmentation and localism results in decision
making that is good at the local level but
detrimental to the region - Decision making is on the local level
- Opportunities are allocated on a regional level,
beyond local control - Economic opportunity, labor force, housing
opportunity, educational opportunity - This creates less than optimal decisions for the
region
21How does Fragmentation and Localism Impact the
Region?
- Fragmentation and localism have worked on a
structural level to maintain and reinforce racial
and social inequity, encourage sprawl and central
city abandonment - Political fragmentation and localism exasperate
the flow of resources to the urban periphery as
communities compete over commercial investment
and high income population (the favored quarter) - Fragmentation allows communities to sort what
people and business they wish to attract
(strengthen economic and social isolation and
segregation) - Fragmentation not only harms communities of color
but harms everyone in the region by. - Driving up housing costs (through exclusionary
zoning) - Limiting regional economic growth and investment
- Creating higher tax burdens for all regional
residents (due to the inefficiency in government
services and disparity in community resources)
22Fragmentation Creates Dysfunctional Regions
- Fragmentation makes the region less economically
competitive by restraining the labor market and
discouraging a unified regional economic
development strategy - Fragmentation creates substantial redundancy in
government services, creating fiscal
inefficiencies for the entire region (and
ultimately impacting the regions taxpayers) - Fragmentation has created dysfunctional regions,
with mobility restricted for poor residents,
infrastructure illogically distributed and
communities fighting over investment - This not only works to harm the regions residents
(especially communities of color) but limits the
economic vitality and competitiveness of the
entire region
23Globalization, Fragmentation and Regionalism
- Globalization has heightened the need for
regionalism and compounded the problems
associated with fragmentation - As national trade restrictions are relaxed,
regions become the primary economic actors,
competing globally for investment - Capital investment is no longer tied to a
particular place, creating zero sum competition
between local governments for investment - Fragmentation fuels this competition at the
expense of the entire region - Fragmentation also creates an incoherent
framework for the region to address this economic
challenge
24Globalization, Fragmentation and Regionalism
- The region not only competes globally for
investment but now must compete nationally and
globally for population - The global economic competitiveness of the
Cleveland region is impacted by the brain drain
of young educated workers to other regions within
the United States - International immigration of skilled workers is
one approach to counter this trend - International immigration has also proven to be
one of the driving forces for economic growth
(and population growth) in many declining central
cities - The region must compete for these new residents
and develop a coherent regional strategy to meet
this goal
25What Does Regionalism Look Like?
- There are multiple regional strategies (or
structures) to address fragmentation, sprawl,
economic change inequity and fiscal distress - Regional Governance
- Annexation
- Mergers Consolidation
- Regional Functions
- Tax base or other forms of revenue sharing
- Opening the regional housing market
- Regional land use control
- Regional Infrastructure
- Infrastructure related growth management
- Each region must choose which strategies would
work best based on needs and the potential impact
26Understanding Types of Regionalism
- Most regionalism initiatives can be placed into
four categories - Coordinating Regionalism
- Regional coordination around specific issues
(transportation, housing, land use) - Examples Metropolitan Planning Organizations,
Regional land use authorities (Portland) - Administrative Regionalism
- Special districts and inter-local government
agreements to tackle regional problems - Examples Multi-jurisdictional service areas for
infrastructure and public services, service
agreements between local governments - Structural Regionalism
- Physically rearranging local government
boundaries to create a larger regional body - Examples Annexation policies, consolidations and
municipal mergers - Fiscal Regionalism
- Strategies to share the cost and benefits from
development, and address inequity in local
community resources - Examples All revenue sharing strategies tax
base sharing, cultural asset districts, employee
based taxing strategies
Models of regionalism adapted from The Regional
Governing of Metropolitan America by David
Miller at the University of Pittsburgh (2002).
27Understanding Types of Regionalism
- Which of these approaches already exist in
Cleveland and what future approaches would be
appropriate? - Coordinating Regionalism
- Cleveland Example The NE Ohio metropolitan
planning organization's work in coordinating
transportation investment - Potential Could a regional coordinating agency
focus on regional affordable housing? - Administrative Regionalism
- Cleveland Example Greater Cleveland regional
transit authority, Cleveland Metro Parks,
Inter-governmental agreements to share road salt - Potential Could a regionalized public water and
sewer agency plan for regional infrastructure
needs? - Structural Regionalism
- Cleveland Example None
- Potential Mergers of smaller local government or
merging local school districts? - Fiscal Regionalism
- Cleveland Example Earnings tax
- Potential Could tax base sharing be applied to
the region?
28How should we measure the potential impact of
regionalism based initiatives?
- Look at the impact on regional fragmentation
- What fragmented regional functions or structures
will be improved? - Look at the land area impacted
- How much of the region will be impacted?
- Is this where growth is currently occurring or
will occur? - Look at the impact on the regions population
- How will the regions population be impacted?
Will disenfranchised communities see their
opportunities and mobility improved? - Can power dilution be avoided for communities of
color?
29Concerns about regionalism
- Often regions rush to regional governmental/struct
ural solutions (such as consolidation) without
exploring other cooperative intergovernmental
strategies - There may be significant resistance of
communities of color to adopting this approach - Why?
- Communities of color and low-income communities
can be further marginalized through power
dilution from government consolidation and
mergers - Regionalism may not explicitly target the issues
impacting racial equity (such as housing,
education and tax base)
30Power dilution from regionalism
- Minority representation dilution
- In most regions, consolidation reforms have
resulted in a reduction in the concentration of
African American voters (and in some cases
elected political representation) - Indianapolis Unigov
- Schools originally not addressed in
consolidation, fragmented tax districts also
maintained and created political
disenfranchisement of African American community - Louisville Consolidation
- Recent research has found suburban political
interests (and development) dominate the
political agenda at the expense of African
American central city neighborhoods
31Can regionalism exist without regional government
or consolidation?
- Yes
- Intergovernmental arrangements can address
fragmentation and inequity without resulting in
power dilution for communities of color - Example Pre-consolidation Louisville
- Prior to the consolidation in Louisville, the
city and county developed an agreement to share
occupational tax revenues and jointly manage land
use planning and development - During the this time period, investment increased
significantly in Louisville and indicators of
disparity were improved - Example Minneapolis-St. Paul
- The twin cities region remains highly fragmented
(the 2nd most fragmented region per capita
nationally) but equity has been improved through
regionalized tax base sharing - Additional initiatives to equalize school funding
have also improved equity
32Addressing key equity issues
- Not all regional intergovernmental arrangements
are positive for communities of color - Arrangements that ignore the key issues fueling
inequity (housing, education, fiscal inequity)
allow inequity to continue unabated - Regionalism must address these key issues,
especially if support is to be gained from the
central city - If regionalism is to work in Northeast Ohio,
Clevelands suburbs must help the city deal with
unemployment, homelessness and a cash-strapped
school systemwere wasting our time if we
dont deal with the substantive things - Cleveland City Council president Frank Jackson on
his concerns about consolidating public services
in Cleveland - .if regionalism isnt dealing with land use,
fiscal disparities, housing and education then
regionalism isnt dealing with the issues that
count" - David Rusk (2002)
33How do we build upon existing successful
initiatives?
- Cleveland has had many successes in combating
sprawl and fragmentation and promoting equity - Land Bank
- Downtown Revitalization
- Business Leaders Promoting A Regional Approach
- Revenue Sharing
- Transportation
- Philanthropic Initiatives
- Can these initiatives be built upon (or
coordinated) to further promote regionalism?
34Initiatives in Cleveland
- Land Bank
- Along with Atlanta, Cleveland has one of the best
land bank programs in the nation. This is key to
promoting infill development - Downtown Revitalization
- In the 1990s Cleveland was one of the most
successful cities in the Midwest in attracting
reinvestment back into its downtown
35Initiatives in Cleveland
- Greater Cleveland Partnership Business Leaders
Promoting a Regional Approach - The private sector can have a significant role in
regionalism initiatives - A regional business leadership initiative can not
only promote job growth in the region but also
address issues related to equity - Chicago Spurred by labor shortages, the business
leaders in the Chicago region have worked to
expand the supply of workforce housing
36Initiatives in Cleveland
- Revenue Sharing
- No tax base sharing occurs in relation to
property taxes but a revenue sharing structure
exists in respect to the earnings tax (Taxes
paid by employees from other jurisdictions who
pay taxes in the municipality they work in) - But for this policy to continue to be successful
it depends on employment staying concentrated
within the City of Cleveland - In addition, recent downtown infrastructure
(stadiums etc.) is funded by both the suburban
communities and the City of Cleveland - Providing another significant example of revenue
sharing structure for the region
37Initiatives in Cleveland
- Transportation Policy
- The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
involves regional cooperation (within Cuyahoga
County) - The regions metropolitan planning organization
Northeast Ohio Area-wide Coordinating Agency
(NOACA) provides regional transportation planning
for five counties in Northeast Ohio
38Philanthropic Initiatives in Cleveland
- Foundations in Cleveland have targeted resources
into exploring regionalism for the region - The George Gund Foundation and others have pooled
resources to improve the regions economic
climate - The Cleveland Foundation recently funded the
Presidents Council (an African American business
leadership organization) to research how African
Americans can play a role in and benefit from
regionalism in Cleveland - The George Gund Foundation provided funding for
research analyzing how regionalism could impact
health and human services organizations in
Cleveland
39What should be done?
- Coalition Building
- Coalitions are critical if regional initiatives
and consolidation are going to gain popular
support - Consider building support among key stakeholders
- The business community, labor community
- The private sector can have a significant role in
regionalism initiatives - Distressed older suburban communities
- Social justice faith-based organizations
- Affordable housing advocates
- Smart growth and environmental advocates
40What should be done?
- Grab the lowest fruit on the tree
- Identify possible turning points or critical
interventions. - For example, is home ownership a good way to
address housing disparity? How do you structure
and use other resources to accomplish this? - Work with the existing regional structures in
Cleveland to promote equity issues and
regionalism - Example Metropolitan Planning Organization,
Regional Business Organization, Existing Revenue
Sharing Structures
41What should be done?
- Examine the impact of all regionalism proposals
before supporting - How will fragmentation be impacted? What
populations and land area will be impacted? The
impact on communities of color? - Do not rush to regional government/structural
solutions such as consolidation without exploring
all options - A multi-faceted approach (of multiple regional
initiatives) may be necessary - Consider the large number of intergovernmental
cooperation strategies (functional solutions) - These may prove more effective, meet less
resistance and avoid power dilution for
communities of color - But.these must address the principle issues
impacting racial equity such as housing, schools
and tax base
42For More Information Visit us on-line at
http//www.kirwaninstitute.org/