Water Board Certified Regulatory Program CEQA Training for Basin Planning and TMDLs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Water Board Certified Regulatory Program CEQA Training for Basin Planning and TMDLs

Description:

To understand the rationale behind CEQA well enough to manage a CEQA process ... Relies on strict adherence to process. as a way to ensure public participation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: swrc1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Water Board Certified Regulatory Program CEQA Training for Basin Planning and TMDLs


1
Water BoardCertified Regulatory Program CEQA
Training forBasin Planning and TMDLs
  • April 2008

http//www.waterboards.ca.gov/academy
2
Introduction to CEQA for Certified Regulatory
Programs
  • Terry Rivasplata, Jones Stokes
  • Steven Blum, OCC

3
Why Are We Here?
  • To understand the rationale behind CEQA well
    enough to manage a CEQA process well and prepare
    excellent CEQA documentation
  • To understand the differences between normal
    CEQA and CEQA for Certified Regulatory Programs
    (and theyre not as big as you think)
  • To prepare staff to do an excellent job of
    developing CEQA analyses in the future

4
What is CEQA?
  • A process designed to reveal potential
    environmental impacts of a project
  • A vehicle that empowers citizens to influence
    environmental decision-making
  • A process not a permit
  • A legal requirement that can ensure
  • Real public participation
  • Mitigation of adverse impacts, whenever feasible

5
Who Must Comply with CEQA?
  • CEQA requirements apply to California public
    agencies (state and local)
  • Projects proposed by private entities come under
    CEQA when state or local permits are required

6
How CEQA Works
  • CEQA is intended to be interpreted in a manner
    that affords the fullest possible protection of
    the environment (Friends of Mammoth v. Board of
    Supervisors 8 Cal.3d 247)
  • Relies on strict adherence to process as a way
    to ensure public participationin government
    decision making

7
How CEQA Works
  • Environmental analysis must include
  • A description of project
  • Potential significant impacts
  • Review of mitigation and alternatives that will
    avoid impacts
  • Review of cumulative impacts
  • All environmental documents are subject to both
    public and public agency review and comment

8
Finding CEQA
  • CEQA statute Public Resources Code 21000 et
    seq. (California Environmental Quality Act)
  • CEQA Guidelines 14 CCR 15000 et seq.
  • SWRCB implementation regulations 23 CCR 3720
    et seq.
  • Updated statute, guidelines, caselaw, other info
    http//www.ceres.ca.gov/ceqa

9
What is a Project?
  • The whole of an action that may cause either
  • A direct physical change in the environment
  • A reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change
    in the environment
  • Public agency issuance of a grant, loan, or other
    financing of a project
  • Categorical exemption for studies (Guidelines
    15306)

Guidelines 15378
10
What is a Project?
  • Adoption of a plan or policy that may result in
    a significant environmental impact
  • Issuance of a permit, license, or entitlement
  • NPDES permits are exempt from CEQA

Guidelines 15378
11
What are Significant Impacts?
  • A significant impact causes a substantial or
    potentially substantial adverse change in
    physical conditions in the project area
  • Environmental review must consider
  • Direct impacts
  • Reasonably foreseeable indirect impacts
  • Impacts to the environment including impacts not
    regulated by the lead agency

Guidelines 15382
12
Levels of Analysis
  • If the project has no potential for significant
    adverse impacts Negative Declaration
  • If significant impacts can be mitigated to
    insignificance Mitigated Negative Declaration
  • If potential remains for significant impacts
    Environmental Impact Report

13
Certified Regulatory Programs
  • Agency programs designed to protect the
    environment and ensure public participation
  • Certified by Secretary of the Resources Agency
  • Exempt from document formatting requirements of
    standard CEQA process (similar content)
  • Examples
  • Basin Planning and policies including TMDLs
    (Water Boards)
  • Timber Harvest Plans (Dept of Forestry and Fire
    Protection)
  • Coastal Development Permits (California Coastal
    Commission)

14
Case Law Defining SEDs
  • Since certification of the Basin Plan program,
    our work has become more controversial and
    subject to litigation
  • Case law has been defining and refining
    requirements for SED
  • Required elements
  • Level of detail
  • Organization of SED

15
Case Law Lessons Learned
  • L.A. River Trash TMDL City of Arcadia
  • Deer Creek Temperature California Sport Fishing
    Alliance
  • L.A. River Metals TMDL Alternatives Analysis
    Case
  • Others

15
16
Certified Regulatory Programs
  • Subject to most normal CEQA requirements
  • Cross-agency consultation
  • Public disclosure and review
  • Notice, scoping, reasonable range of compliance
    methods, alternatives analysis, mitigation,
    cumulative impacts analysis, findings (resolution)

17
CRP Requirements
  • Project documents constitute substitute
    environmental documentation (SED)
  • Basin Plan amendment
  • Supporting Staff Report
  • Checklist/environmental analysis
  • Comments
  • Responses
  • Resolution

18
SED Levels of Analysis
  • Neg Dec-level SED
  • Mitigated Neg Dec-level SED
  • EIR-level SED

19
Environmental Analysis
  • Meets CEQA objectives
  • Considers potential impacts
  • Considers range of compliance methods
  • Evaluates mitigation, alternatives to the
    project, cumulative Impacts

20
CRP Process
  • Basin Plan amendments under the CRP follow the
    public process for Basin Planning
  • Noticing and public review periods
  • SED elements and organization
  • Follow Water Board CEQA regulations (currently
    under revision)
  • State Board SED process satisfies the CEQA
    procedural requirements as well

21
Questions?
22
Basin Planning Overview
  • Rik L. Rasmussen
  • Senior Environmental Scientist
  • Chief, Planning, Standards, and Implementation
    Unit

23
TMDLs and Basin Plan Amendments
  • CWA 303(d)(2) 303(e)
  • EPA Approved TMDLs must be incorporated into
    State Water Quality Management plan
  • Should be incorporated during Continuous Planning
    Process
  • CWA 303(c)
  • Changes to Water Quality Standards
  • Objectives
  • Beneficial Uses
  • NPDES Compliance Schedule Provisions

24
TMDLs and Basin Plan Amendments (contd)
  • Porter-Cologne
  • 13242 requires Program of Implementation for
    Water Quality Objectives
  • Administrative Procedures Act
  • Rule of General Applicability
  • Serial Actions
  • Implementation will take multiple actions of the
    Water Board

25
(No Transcript)
26
Overlapping Legal Requirements? Notice
  • Porter-Cologne
  • Government Code
  • 6061 Publication for one day in a Newspaper
  • 6061.3 Publication for 3 days for Prohibitions
  • CEQA
  • 45 Day for Notice of Filing (23 CCR 3777)
  • Clean Water Act
  • 45 Day Notice (33 US Code 1251 et. Seq.)
  • Administrative Procedures Act
  • CWA Public Participation (Gov.t Code 11353(b)
    (4))

27
Overlapping Legal Requirements?Economics
  • Porter-Cologne
  • When adopting new or revised water qualtiy
    objectives
  • must consider economics (CWC 13241)
  • When adopting an agricultural water quality
    control plan (CWC 13141)
  • Estimate total costs of program
  • Identify potential funding sources

28
Overlapping Legal Requirements?Economics (Contd)
  • CEQA 21159
  • Adoption of a rule or regulation requiring the
    installation of pollution control equipment, or a
    performance standard or treatment requirement

29
Response to Comments
  • Peer review (Health and Safety Code 57004)
  • Written response in record
  • Public comments (23 CCR 3779 40 CFR Part 25
    Administrative Procedures Act)
  • Written response available at hearing
  • Oral response
  • CEQA comments
  • Late comments
  • Summary of oral comments?

30
Hearing Requirements
  • Porter-Cologne
  • 13244 (Regional Board), 13245 (State Board)
  • CEQA
  • Requires Agencies to develop CEQA procedures
  • Procedures must be consistent with all CEQA
    requirements (Joy Road Area Forest and Watershed
    Association v. CDF, 142 Cal.App.4th 656)
  • Clean Water Act
  • Comply with public participation requirements
  • Administrative Procedures Act
  • Defers to Porter-Cologne and CWA

31
(No Transcript)
32
  • State Board Liaisons
  • Joanna Jensen Regions 2 and 6
  • Michael Buckman Regions 3, 7, 4
  • Nirmal Sandhar Regions 9 8
  • Mitchell Goode Regions 1 5
  • Nicholas Martorano Regions 4 5
  • Backup
  • Water Quality Standards Contacts
  • Stephanie Rose Freshwater Bacteria
  • Tom Kimball Methylmercury Fish Tissue
    Objectives, Selenium
  • Steve Camacho Cadmium and Nutrients.
  • David Edwards Chlorine Policy, Toxicity Control
    Provisions (SIP)

33
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com