The polarized target for GEn - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The polarized target for GEn

Description:

Maintaining performance with high beam current. Improving polarimetry. The solutions ... Only two beam lines, with all optics housed on the target itself. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:16
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: gordon112
Category:
Tags: beam | gen | polarized | target

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The polarized target for GEn


1
The polarized target for GEn
Gordon D. Cates, Jr. University of
Virginia Professor of Physics and Radiology
GEn, - October 24, 2003
2
Target issues
  • Snuggling up close to Bigbites fringe fields.
  • Magnetic shielding
  • No room for the laser hut.
  • More compact laser system.
  • Maintaining performance with high beam current.
  • Improving polarimetry

3
The solutions
  • Field clamp around Bigbite
  • Magnet based around an iron box
  • Laser system based around a 5-to-1 combiner.
  • Cell design with larger pumping chamber.
  • Perhaps utilize K/Rb hybrid pumping
  • Electromagnetic shielding (from the iron box) and
    vibration insulation.

4
Top view of magnet concept
5
Bigbite and target/magnet on beamline
6
Bigbite and target/magnet
7
Cutaway view showing some elements of the target
8
Close-up on some elements of the target
9
The laser system
  • Existing system
  • Provides both longitudinal and transverse
    pumping.
  • Four fiber array packages (FAPS) for longitudinal
    pumping.
  • Three FAPS for transverse pumping.
  • Total of (43)x214 beam lines.
  • Optics in laser hut.
  • New system
  • Only one pumping direction required.
  • System based on 5-to-1 combiner.
  • Only two beam lines, with all optics housed on
    the target itself.

10
Similar laser system on noble-gas polarirzer used
for medical imaging
11
Laser system
12
View showing laser system together with oven and
coils
13
Laser system
14
Overview of medical polarizer
15
Performance summary
  • Maximum input power without excessive heating
    around 3x40120 Watts.
  • Power on oven 93 Watts.
  • Homogeneity ok, but not great.
  • Diffuser made by Newport Corp. may be good
    alternative to Coherents new homogenizer.
  • 200 Watt input power not yet achieved.

16
Polarimetry issues
  • Field in iron-box magnet will not be easy to
    scan.
  • AFP scans will need to be done scanning the rf
    frequency and not the field.
  • This means, among other things, that the lock-in
    will need to track a changing frequency.
  • Kentucky system seems to work well, but
    line-shape is somewhat asymmetric.
  • Need to convince ourselves we understand the
    signal if we want to trust it at the 2-3 level.

17
Kentucky NMR apparatus
18
Average of 50 water sweeps at Kentucky
19
Average of 500 water sweeps at Kentucky
20
Single helium sweep at Kentucky
21
Rb spin destruction is a major issue when
polarizing 3He
  • Slow spin exchange necessitates very high Rb
    number densities 2-10 x 1014 cm-3.
  • Spin destruction rates mean high laser power.
  • Laser power itself is less of an issue.
  • High laser power brings its own problems
  • Significant heating.
  • Chemical effects?
  • Other problems?
  • New direction take advantage of slower
    spin-destruction rates for K, which hence has
    higher spin-exchange efficiency.

22
Hybrid (K and Rb) spin-exchange optical pumping
  • Potassium (K) is about ten times more efficient
    than rubidium (Rb) at transferring angular
    momentum from photons to 3He nuclei.
  • Cells containing a mixture of mostly K and a
    little Rb greatly improve the efficiency with
    which the light is used.

Data showing dramatically higher spin-exchange
efficiency for K (Baranga et al., PRL 80, Pg.
2801 (1998))
23
What does it all mean?
  • The spin-exchange rate of K with 3He is about the
    same as Rb with 3He, but..
  • For a given amount of laser power, you can
    polarize many more alkali-metal atoms using
    hybrid pumping.
  • It is unclear how much better performance will be
    when other effects are taken into account.
  • But it looks promising!

24
Where hybrid pumping stands
  • 1998 Romalis clearly showed indirectly that K
    efficiency is much better than Rb efficieny.
  • 2003 Walker and co-workers showed directly K
    efficiency is much better than Rb efficiency.
  • A practical target has yet to be demonstrated.

25
Status and responsibilities
  • Magnet components will arrive soon.
  • Assembly and testing everyone?
  • Most design work remains on targets internal
    components, ladder, movement mechanism, etc.
  • Al Gavalya working with Gordon and Bogdan
  • Laser system, some questions remain, ready to
    order some components.
  • Gordon, Jian-Ping, Bogdan
  • Polarimetry many tests remain.
  • Todd, Wolfgang
  • Cells work just beginning.
  • Jaideep, Gordon
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com