Title: Where to in Scotland for Critical Care Research''a research network
1Where to in Scotland for Critical Care
Research..a research network?
- Tim Walsh
- Chair NIHR CCRN Critical Care Specialty Group
- Chair, SCCTG Executive Group
2The Operating Framework for the NHS in England
2009/10
- 18. NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts have
a statutory duty to support education and
training. All providers of NHS care will need to
increase their participation in research. The
national ambition is to double the number of
patients taking part in clinical trials and other
well-designed research studies within five years.
SHAs are expected to ensure that NHS trusts work
with the National Institute for Health Research
Comprehensive Clinical Research Network locally
to contribute to this progressive increase.
3UK Clinical Research Network
- UKCRN
- Launched in February 2005 as part of UKCRCs
research infrastructure workstream - Coordinating centre in Leeds and London
- National Cancer Research Network (NCRN) already
in existence - established in 2001 - Mental Health Research Network (MHRN) already in
existence established 2004 - Another four TCRNs created from scratch
4NIHR CLRN Funding
- Stage 1 2007 - 2008
- Establishing the NIHR CLRNs
- Fixed allocation to support the management team
- Per capita of population served allocation for
research management staff - Per capita of population served allocation for
research infrastructure
5NIHR CLRN Funding
- Stage 2 2008 - 2009
- All CLRNs continue to receive the fixed and per
capita allocations as in 2007/08 - In addition each CLRN will also receive
activity-based funding - a flexible allocation
calculated on the basis of past activity for that
CLRN - Activity-based funding recalculated annually
- Funding follows activity!
6(No Transcript)
7Specialty Groups
- Groups based on the UKCRC Health Research
Classification System - Provide expertise to the UKCRN and NIHR CCRN in
twenty-six specific topics not covered by the
TCRNs - Secretariat provided by the UKCRN Coordinating
Centre Coordinator and Clerical Officer
8Specialty Group Remit
- Portfolio Development vs Portfolio Delivery
- Specialty Groups funded to improve portfolio
delivery rather than to drive portfolio of
research in a specific topic area - BUT potential to interact with portfolio
development groups - Eg ICNARC, ICS, UK Trial forum etc
9Prof Tim Walsh (Chair) Dr Jonathan Benger (Vice
Chair) Dr Stephen Bonner Dr Jonathan Coles Prof
Charles Hinds Dr Danny McAuley Dr Jonathan
Thompson Dr Duncan Young Prof Julian Bion Prof
Timothy Evans Prof Richard Griffiths Dr Suzanne
Mason Dr David Higgins Dr Mike Grocott Dr Gavin
Perkins Co-opted Kathy Rowan (ICNARC) Fiona
Lecky (TARN) 13 of 26 CLRNs 2 of 3 devolved
nations
10Eligibility for NIHR portfolio
- Basic requirements funded in open national
competition and with independent peer review - Automatic NIHR partners e.g. MRC, DH, major
charities - High priority with adoption process industry
sponsored studies - Medium priority with adoption process e.g. EU
or internationally funded studies, industry
collaborative studies
11Non-automatic funders
- Review by adoption panel process
- Review by experts in field (from specialty
groups) for - Suitability/Practicalities
- Relevance
- In context of current portfolio
- Applies to commercial and non-commercial
non-automatic studies - (No commercial studies yet on the critical
care/EM portfolio)
12Eligibility of funders
- Grey areas still exist
- Funding bodies have to register for eligibility
- Intensive Care Society, NIAA and other relevant
funders still awaiting decisions
13Portfolio
- Studies covering critical care and emergency
medicine (mainly) - Observational and interventional studies
- Single centre and multicentre studies
- CLRNs that have nominated critical care as a
local priority should support portfolio studies - Nature of support not clearly defined
- Accrual to these studies generates resource to
local CLRN
14Overview of studies
- 23 active on the portfolio
- 2 studies registered on the portfolio, but in set
up - 4 studies in set up, not yet on portfolio
- 2 studies completed/closed
- TracMan (909 patients reported to
investigators/Brussels) - SIGNET (502 patients reporting to investigators
October/ESICM Vienna)
15Total studies 23
Multicentre studies 17
Single centre studies 6
Emergency Medicine 7
Critical Care 10
Critical Care 6
16Total studies 23
Multicentre studies 17
Single centre studies 6
Emergency Medicine 7
Critical Care 10
Critical Care 6
Observational or non-intervention 3 RCT 4
Observational or non-intervention 2 RCT 8
Observational or non-intervention 5 RCT 1
17Total studies 23
Multicentre studies 17
Single centre studies 6
Emergency Medicine 7
Critical Care 10
Critical Care 6
Observational or non-intervention 3 RCT 4
Observational or non-intervention 2 RCT 8
Observational or non-intervention 5 RCT 1
18RCTs in Critical Care
- High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus
conventional ventilation for ARDS (OSCAR) - The Beta 2 agonist lung injury trial (BALTI II)
- The utility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing
for pre-operative risk stratification to guide
perioperative care and reduce postoperative
morbidity - Beta agonist lung injury prevention trial
(BALTI-prevent) - Impact of an aerobic exercise rehabilitation
programme on fitness and QOL in ICU survivors
19RCTs in Critical Care
- A feasibility randomised trial comparing
restrictive versus liberal blood transfusion
strategies in patients requiring four or more
days of mechanical ventilation (RELIEVE) - Randomised evaluation of surgery with craniectomy
for uncontrollable elevation of intracranial
pressure - Optimisation of perioperative cardiovascular
management to improve surgical outcomes (OPTIMISE)
20- The Beta 2 agonist lung injury trial (BALTI II)
- Fang.Gao_at_warwick.ac.uk
21BALTI II
- A multicentre pragmatic randomised double-blind
placebo-controlled - clinical trial
- Patients fulfilling the American-European
Consensus Conference Definition - of ARDS
- Randomised 11 to receive an IV infusion either
of salbutamol - or placebo for a maximum of seven days
- Data recorded by participating ICUs until
hospital discharge and all - surviving patients followed up by post at six
and twelve months - post randomisation
- Primary outcome is mortality at 28 days after
randomisation - Secondary outcomes are a range of mortality,
ventilation, QOL, - and economic outcomes
- 1,334 patients from about fifty ICUs in the UK
22- Beta agonist lung injury prevention trial
(BALTI-prevent) - gavin.perkins_at_virgin.net
23BALTI-prevent
- Double blind RCT
- Patients undergoing oesophagectomy
- Inhaled salmeterol versus placebo during
perioperative period - Follow up for 3 months
- 216 patients
- Primary outcome reduction in acute lung injury
24OSCAR
- multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT)
comparing conventional positive pressure
ventilation with high frequency oscillatory
ventilation (HFOV) for adults with acute
respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). - Treatment A Conventional positive pressure
ventilation, or Treatment B High frequency
oscillatory ventilation. - The primary outcome is mortality at 30 days after
randomisation - Secondary outcomes at 6, 12 months (include QOL,
functional measures) - 1006 patients in 12 centres
25Total studies 23
Multicentre studies 17
Single centre studies 6
Emergency Medicine 7
Critical Care 10
Critical Care 6
Observational or non-intervention 3 RCT 4
Observational or non-intervention 2 RCT 8
Observational or non-intervention 5 RCT 1
26Non-interventional/observational studies
- Genetic and epigenetic modulators of gene
expression in sepsis as part of the UK Genomic
Advances in Sepsis (GAinS) study - Charles Hinds/Julian Knight
- A study of the long term economic impact of
critical illness and its association with health
related QoL in patients discharged from Intensive
Care Units (iCAN-UK) - Steve Brett/John Griffiths
27Other Pipeline Projects
- Risk Adjustment in Neuro Critical Care (RAIN)
- RCT of early enteral with parenteral nutrition
(CALORIES) - RCT of Early Goal Directed Therapy for Sepsis
(PROMISE) - RCT of Therapeutic hypothermia in head injured
patients (EUROTHERM)
28Scotland
- Funding structure fundamentally different
- RD departments
- Currently undergoing period of disembedding
funding - Academic Health Science Centres
- No Accrual funding/payments for portfolio studies
- Network funding for Critical Care not committed
- Scotland considered a single entity in UK process
29Scottish Solutions
- Approach to the CSO
- Building up momentum through individual Board RD
support (research nurses and coordinators) - Professional collaboration nationally
- Changing role for the SCCTG
- Recording National Accrual as a
quality/performance marker through the SCCTG/SICS
30Any Ideas?