Placeshaping: a shared ambition for the future of local government Next Steps N3PD 6th June 2007 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Loading...

PPT – Placeshaping: a shared ambition for the future of local government Next Steps N3PD 6th June 2007 PowerPoint presentation | free to view - id: 1990c5-ZDc1Z



Loading


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation
Title:

Placeshaping: a shared ambition for the future of local government Next Steps N3PD 6th June 2007

Description:

Need to argue the value of difference. Need for a grown-up debate about what we ... CorVu / Isle of Wight Council. PSL Consulting / London Borough of Merton ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 99
Provided by: bip
Category:

less

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Placeshaping: a shared ambition for the future of local government Next Steps N3PD 6th June 2007


1
(No Transcript)
2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Place-shapinga shared ambition for the future
of local governmentNext StepsN3PD6th June
2007
  • Sir Michael Lyons

7
Lyons- the headlines
  • The type of country we want to live in
  • Communities to choose more for themselves
    (satisfaction)
  • Need to argue the value of difference
  • Need for a grown-up debate about what we want and
    what we are willing to pay for
  • A single system of Government not a spat
  • Confused accountability undermines trust
  • A New Constitutional settlement

8
Local Government - Role
  • Placeshaping - a wider role
  • (Leadership ,convening and coalition)
  • Flexibility and the scope to respond
  • Scope to grow the cake
  • Helping to manage the pressures

9
Local Government -Funding
  • No golden key
  • A mosaic of changes
  • Flexibility much more important than the balance
    of funding
  • Need incentives for growth and efficiency
  • Council tax not broken but urgent need to address
    fairness and value

10
Short-term recommendations to central government
  • Increase local flexibility / leave more scope for
    local choice
  • less specific grants and soft controls (yes
    CSR)
  • supplementary business rate (yes, consult)
  • power to charge for domestic waste to manage
    pressures (consider)
  • Address fairness concerns by reform of CTB
  • Recognise as a rebate automate take-up
    (consider)
  • Raise savings limits for pensioners to 50K
    (consider)
  • Improve incentives in the funding system
  • Improve incentives in the funding system (LABGI
    yes)
  • Improve transparency of the funding system
  • Introduce independent voice to help scrutinise
    funding decisions and promises (rules out grants
    commission awaiting response)
  • End capping (No)

11
Medium and long-term recommendations to CG
  • Council Tax
  • Revalue council tax to improve fairness (not this
    parliament)
  • Extra bands to help those in low value
    properties, paid for by those at the top (not
    this parliament)
  • Other Funding
  • Consider assigning a fixed proportion of income
    tax to local government, (consider)
  • Consider power to levy tourist tax if case based
    on local public support. (No)
  • Local Income Tax feasible, could improve
    fairness, would take time to implement and has
    significant costs
  • Relocalise business rates to provide local
    flexibility and better incentives
  • Both need greater public support and
    understanding than currently exists Government
    will continue to keep under review

12
Recommendations to local government
  • Local government needs to raise its game to make
    the most of current opportunities
  • Provide strong local leadership and long term
    vision
  • Lead as convenor across local public services
  • Engage with public to inform decisions, manage
    pressures and expectations
  • Be recognised as champions of efficiency
  • Reduce dependence on central government for
    guidance and support
  • Ensure effective national voice through the Local
    Government Association
  • Political parties need to improve councillor
    recruitment and support

13
Taking Stock
  • 3 Reports (Dec 05, May 06,March 07) together
    provide argument and evidence for change
  • Key recommendations enshrined in the White
    Paper.Just the beginning.
  • Budget report accepts case for financial
    flexibility and agrees further consideration of
    most proposals.
  • Need to make the case to this Government and
    those who want to be its successor
  • Need to win popular support by engagement and by
    demonstrating impact and value

14
How can you contribute?
  • Perceived value for money remains a key indicator
  • Room for a new relationship with business
    community
  • Offering real local choice
  • Looking beyond the boundaries
  • Looking beyond the budget

15
Vision for the future
  • Strong, confident local government with a good
    range of powers to tailor its place-shaping
    behaviours to improve well-being and prosperity
    in every community
  • Greater public understanding of local spending
    decisions who is responsible for them and how
    they are made based on greater engagement to
    inform difficult decisions and manage pressures
  • Distinctive communities, proud and confident
    about their different choices
  • As a result, greater public trust and
    satisfaction with the system of government as a
    whole

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
WELCOME BACK
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
The Politics of Procurement
  • Why procurement matters?
  • What is happening? Legacy and solutions
  • Conflicts of objectives
  • Assessing performance

23
Why procurement matters?
  • 140bn of public sector purchases per annum (10
    of GDP)
  • Potential for government savings aim for 5.5bn
    pa of Gershon 20bn pa savings
  • Public sector procurement crucial for some
    sectors (defence pharmaceuticals construction
    health and care services transport
    infrastructure IT consulting)
  • Link to global and EU markets and rules

24
The legacy problem
  • (1999 Gershon Review)
  • Fragmentation of procurement circa 200 councils
    numerous government agencies and quangos
  • No common framework lack of consistency lack of
    common records
  • No common process for large, complex, projects
    (IT disasters)
  • Lack of procurement skills and training
  • Procurement staff bi-passed
  • Poor value for money, especially professional
    services (management consultants financial
    legal)

25
Better procurement What is happening?
  • Leading role for OGC and PSA of NHS (and now GPS)
  • Demand aggregation
  • Better processes
  • E-government
  • Procurement IT
  • Collaborative bulk contracts
  • From spot purchase to large supplies
  • Government buying agency
  • Regional consortia
  • Collaboration across departments
  • Framework contracts
  • Gateway for big projects
  • Procurement card for small purchases
  • 63 e-auctions 20 saving on 1bn
  • e-tenders (2bn)

- Prince 2 ITIL
- British Telecom
- IS-TC in the NHS
26
Procurement The conflicts
  • Centralisation/aggregation .v. Localisation/decent
    ralisation
  • Value for money .v. Other objectives
    (protectionism, as in defence sustainability
    social inclusion, as in London)
  • Business confidentiality .v. Accountability and
    transparency (Gateways)
  • Fair and open competition .v. Speedy, simple,
    processes (Dr. Foster .v. DoH)
  • Access to small business voluntary sector .v.
    Economies of scale
  • Short term savings .v. Long term relationships

27
Efficiency- honest and transparent?
  • Reported Efficiency Savings 13.3bn
  • NAO
  • 3.5 billion fair (25)
  • 6.7 billion uncertain (50)
  • 3.1 billion unclear (25)
  • Cost of achieving efficiency savings bn?
  • NOTE The Gershon Review set Departments targets
    on the basis that efficiency savings could be
    reported gross of costs

28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
SUSTAINABILITY AWARD
Sponsored by
31
SUSTAINABILITY AWARD
The finalists are Authorities Buying
Consortium Department for Work and Pensions
Sustainable Development Team London Fire and
Emergency Planning Authority North Lincolnshire
Council Highways and Planning Scottish Natural
Heritage
32
SUSTAINABILITY AWARD
Highly Commended
33
SUSTAINABILITY AWARD
Highly Commended AUTHORITIES BUYING CONSORTIUM
34
SUSTAINABILITY AWARD
Sponsored by
35
SUSTAINABILITY AWARD
Highly Commended
36
SUSTAINABILITY AWARD
Highly Commended DEPARTMENT FOR WORK AND PENSIONS
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TEAM
37
SUSTAINABILITY AWARD
Sponsored by
38
SUSTAINABILITY AWARD
The winner is
39
SUSTAINABILITY AWARD
The winner is NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE COUNCIL
HIGHWAYS AND PLANNING
40
(No Transcript)
41
e-GOVERNMENT AWARD
Sponsored by
42
e-GOVERNMENT AWARD
Simon Lill Public Sector Sales Director
43
e-GOVERNMENT AWARD
The finalists are Caerphilly County Borough
Council City of Edinburgh Council eProcurement
Scotl_at_nd Service Home Office London Borough of
Camden
44
e-GOVERNMENT AWARD
The winner is
45
e-GOVERNMENT AWARD
The winner is ePROCUREMENTSCOTL_at_ND Service
46
(No Transcript)
47
BEST SERVICE AWARD
Sponsored by
48
BEST SERVICE AWARD
Julie WhiteHead of Public Sector Marketing
49
BEST SERVICE AWARD
The finalists are Black Country Housing / Dudley
Metropolitan Borough Council BSS / Big Lottery
Fund Lion Apparel Systems / London Fire and
Emergency Planning Authority PageOne Ltd /
British Army Reliance / Thames Valley Police
50
BEST SERVICE AWARD
Highly Commended
51
BEST SERVICE AWARD
Highly Commended BSS / BIG LOTTERY FUND
52
BEST SERVICE AWARD
Sponsored by
53
BEST SERVICE AWARD
The winner is
54
BEST SERVICE AWARD
The winner is PAGEONE LTD / BRITISH ARMY
55
(No Transcript)
56
BEST SMALL SUPPLIER INNOVATION AWARD
Sponsored by
57
BEST SMALL SUPPLIER INNOVATION AWARD
Rob LittleSenior Responsible Officer
58
BEST SMALL SUPPLIER INNOVATION AWARD
The finalists are Amble Electrical Distributors
/ Luton Borough Council Blue Fountain Systems /
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Bow House
Ltd / Authorities Buying Consortium CorVu / Isle
of Wight Council PSL Consulting / London Borough
of Merton
59
BEST SMALL SUPPLIER INNOVATION AWARD
Highly Commended
60
BEST SMALL SUPPLIER INNOVATION AWARD
Highly Commended BOW HOUSE LTD /AUTHORITIES
BUYING CONSORTIUM
61
BEST SMALL SUPPLIER INNOVATION AWARD
Sponsored by
62
BEST SMALL SUPPLIER INNOVATION AWARD
The winner is
63
BEST SMALL SUPPLIER INNOVATION AWARD
The winner is BLUE FOUNTAIN SYSTEMS / STOCKPORT
MBC
64
(No Transcript)
65
YOUNG PROCUREMENT PROFESSIONAL AWARD
66
YOUNG PROCUREMENT PROFESSIONAL AWARD
The finalists are Robert Anstee, Ministry of
Defence James Brooks, Sheffield College Sharon
Griffin, Authorities Buying Consortium Joanne
Leah, Allerdale Borough Council Natalie Ledger,
Sheffield College
67
YOUNG PROCUREMENT PROFESSIONAL AWARD
Highly Commended
68
YOUNG PROCUREMENT PROFESSIONAL AWARD
Highly Commended ROBERT ANSTEEMINISTRY OF DEFENCE
69
YOUNG PROCUREMENT PROFESSIONAL AWARD
70
YOUNG PROCUREMENT PROFESSIONAL AWARD
The winner is
71
YOUNG PROCUREMENT PROFESSIONAL AWARD
The winner is JOANNE LEAHALLERDALE BOROUGH
COUNCIL
72
(No Transcript)
73
INDIVIDUALEXCELLENCEAWARD
74
INDIVIDUAL EXCELLENCE AWARD
The finalists are Robert Anstee, Ministry of
Defence Ian Hardcastle, East Ayrshire
Council Jean Henderson, Authorities Buying
Consortium Roger Simpson Jones, London Borough of
EalingMelanie Walsh, South West Fire Rescue
Services
75
INDIVIDUAL EXCELLENCE AWARD
The winner is
76
INDIVIDUAL EXCELLENCE AWARD
The winner is MELANIE WALSHSOUTH WEST FIRE
RESCUE SERVICES
77
(No Transcript)
78
TEAMEXCELLENCEAWARD
79
TEAM EXCELLENCE AWARD
The finalists are Authorities Buying
Consortium Bedfordshire County Council Childrens
Commissioning Service Department for Environment,
Food and Rural Affairs Department for Work and
Pensions Office Services Project Team Essex
Procurement Hub
80
TEAM EXCELLENCE AWARD
The finalists are London Borough of
Havering Manchester City Council Corporate
Technical Services Group South West Fire and
Rescue Services Southwark Council Welsh Health
Supplies
81
TEAM EXCELLENCE AWARD
Highly Commended
82
TEAM EXCELLENCE AWARD
Highly Commended MANCHESTER CITY
COUNCILCORPORATE TECHNICAL SERVICES GROUP
83
TEAMEXCELLENCEAWARD
84
TEAM EXCELLENCE AWARD
Highly Commended
85
TEAM EXCELLENCE AWARD
Highly Commended DEPARTMENT OF WORK AND PENSIONS
OFFICE SERVICES PROJECT TEAM
86
TEAMEXCELLENCEAWARD
87
TEAM EXCELLENCE AWARD
The winner is
88
TEAM EXCELLENCE AWARD
The winner is BEDFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL
CHILDRENS COMMISSIONING SERVICE
89
(No Transcript)
90
LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENTAWARD
91
(No Transcript)
92
LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENTAWARD
93
LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD
The recipient is
94
LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD
The recipient is DAVE WHELLER
95
(No Transcript)
96
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT
97
See you at National Public Procurement
Practitioners Day 2008 Further details announced
soon at www.n3pd.com
98
(No Transcript)
About PowerShow.com