Rights, right on or the right thing to do A critical exploration of young people's engagement in par - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Rights, right on or the right thing to do A critical exploration of young people's engagement in par

Description:

... of above; consultation with Steering Group and UK SCRC; preparation of draft ... to test' draft recommendations with panel members and wider reference group; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: sallyh7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rights, right on or the right thing to do A critical exploration of young people's engagement in par


1

Strategic Advisor for Social Work and Social Care
Research

2
Aims
  • to progress a UK-wide strategy to develop a
    sound long-term infrastructure for social work
    and social care research
  • to promote high quality research and capacity of
    research community to produce it (distinctive
    focus on knowledge generation)
  • to identify the optimal role for ESRC and others
    in advancing the agenda
  • to build on existing momentum for change and
    concurrent initiatives, to invigorate the
    research field and research community of practice

3
A formidable challenge..
  • bringing together diverse and dispersed
    stakeholder perspectives
  • making productive connections with other
    disciplines while promoting distinctive social
    work and social care research
  • developing shared recommendations for research
    themes, priorities, structure, mechanisms,
    funding
  • establishing complementarity with concurrent
    policy/research strategies and initiatives
  • developing coherent working arrangements for
    future planning
  • balancing enhancement of intrinsic research
    quality with utility for policy and practice

4
Stage 1 Objectives
  • To consolidate current evidence
  • base on
  • research capacity and capability needs
  • existing resources and opportunities
  • career pathway points for intervention
  • key interdisciplinary linkages
  • funding models
  • gaps in all the above

5
Stage 2 Objectives
  • To plan for future and agree
  • recommendations for
  • organising research themes
  • short, medium and long-term research priorities
  • optimal structures, mechanisms, and career
    intervention points
  • (co)funding models to support these

6
Methodology Delphi technique
  • structured group communication process diverse
    and dispersed experts address complex problem
    through iterative stages, towards common
    objectives
  • establish consultative panel (c30 members)
    representing as full as possible range of
    stakeholder perspectives
  • iterative web based exchange, culminating in
    consultative event to test recommendations
  • advantages logistics, time, cost, equal voice,
    committed network formally constituted
  • embedded within a four-stage work programme Sept
    08-Aug 09

7
Preliminary Stage (Sept/Oct 2008)
  • orientation, planning, networking and preliminary
    consultation (includes Steering Group UKSCRC)
  • identifying sampling frame -organisations and key
    individuals
  • recruitment to consultative panel
  • desktop review of available evidence and gaps
  • identification of exemplar research themes for
    consultation focus
  • design of Stage 1 questionnaire and setting up
    consultation website

8
Stage 1 Consultation Analysis (Nov 2008 Feb
2009)
  • questionnaire summarizes existing evidence base,
    using exemplar research themes
  • invites responses to confirm or modify,
  • address gaps, highlight constituency-specific
  • issues, suggest priorities
  • analysis/synthesis of feedback incorporated
  • into discussion document for further comment
  • analysis/synthesis informs Interim Progress
  • Report and design of Stage 2 questionnaire

9
Stage 2 Consultation Analysis (Mar - Jun
2009)
  • questionnaire drawing on Stage 1 synthesis to
    elicit views on
  • further research themes and priorities
  • optimal structures, mechanisms, career
    intervention points
  • potential (co)funding models
  • analysis/synthesis of feedback incorporated into
    discussion document for further comment
  • analysis/synthesis of above consultation with
    Steering Group and UK SCRC preparation of draft
    report and recommendations

10
Stage 3 Testing and Finalising Recommendations
(Jul/Aug 2009)
  • two linked events special interest group
    meeting and symposium at JSWERC conference July
    2009
  • to test draft recommendations with panel
    members and wider reference group consolidate
    shared ownership of recommendations
  • feedback to be incorporated into final Report and
    recommendations to Steering Group
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com