FP6 Marie Curie Information Day Host actions University of Stirling, 4th December 2003 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 71
About This Presentation
Title:

FP6 Marie Curie Information Day Host actions University of Stirling, 4th December 2003

Description:

European Research Area, Commission Paper, Jan 2000. What is a Framework Programme? ... 2 years with an Intra-European Fellowship under an employment contract: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 72
Provided by: McKi60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FP6 Marie Curie Information Day Host actions University of Stirling, 4th December 2003


1
FP6 Marie Curie Information DayHost
actionsUniversity of Stirling, 4th December 2003
  • Estelle Kane
  • UK Research Office

2
What is UKRO?
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research
Council (BBSRC)
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research
Council (EPSRC)
Medical Research Council (MRC)
Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council
(PPARC)
3
UKROs mission
To promote effective UK participation in EU
funded research, higher education training
related activities by alerting subscribers to
the opportunities available providing updates on
developments exchanging information between UK
EU
4
UKRO services
  • Web http//www.ukro.ac.uk
  • Advice to European Officers researchers
  • UK Mobility National Contact Point
  • UK Briefing visits
  • Brussels Meeting room

5
Overview of session
  • What is the European Research Area (ERA)?
  • What is the Framework Programme?
  • Outline of Marie Curie Actions
  • Proposal submission and evaluations
  • Making the most of your application

6
European Research Area (ERA) Rationale
  • Need to bring national initiatives closer
    together, and help them achieve greater coherence
  • This is the aim of the ERA project, the reference
    framework for European research since the Lisbon
    European Council in March 2000

7
ERA objectives
  • Research
  • Innovation
  • Infrastructure
  • Human Resources
  • Science, Society and Citizens

European Research Area, Commission Paper, Jan 2000
8
What is a Framework Programme?
  • The principal EU Programme for RTD
  • 4 years in duration
  • FP5 1999-2002 14.96Bn
  • FP6 2002-2005 17.5Bn
  • Contract research
  • European collaboration
  • User driven approach
  • Prioritised research areas

9
Programme content
Life Sciences, Genomics and Biotechnology for
Health
New/Emerging ST and Policy Support
Information Society Technologies
Nanotechnologies and Nanosciences,
Knowledge-Based Multifunctional Materials
and New Production Processes and Devices
SME Activities
Specific Activities Covering a Wider Field of
Research
Thematic
Aeronautics and Space
Food Quality and Safety
International Co-operation
Sustainable Development, Global Change and
Ecosystems
Citizens and Governance in the Knowledge Society
Science and Society
Innovation and SMEs
Human Resources and Mobility
Research Infrastructures
Horizontal
Co-ordination of Research Activities
Development of RTD/Innovation Policies
Underpinning
10
Participation in the Framework Programme
  • EU Member States Austria, Belgium, Denmark,
    Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy,
    Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden,
    UK
  • EEA CountriesIceland, Liechtenstein, Norway
  • Association Agreement Countries Israel,
    Switzerland
  • Candidate Countries Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech
    Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary,
    Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia,
    Turkey
  • Third Countries INCO (Developing, Mediterranean,
    Russia and NIS, Western Balkans), all other
    countries

11
Marie Curie Actions in brief
  • Estelle Kane
  • UK Research Office

12
What are Marie Curie Actions?
  • Human Resources and Mobility Programme
  • 1580M
  • A series of fellowships to support the
  • training and mobility of researchers, within the
    context of promoting excellence in European
    Research
  • Aimed at individual researchers, research groups
    and companies

13
Key features
  • Open to 3rd country nationals
  • No age limit, but experience criterion
  • Reintegration and return measures
  • Excellence promotion measures
  • Life-long learning concept
  • Personal/family situation of researchers
  • Bottom-up approach

14
Marie Curie programme structure
MC Chairs
Re-integration Grants
Institutional funding
Excellence Grants Awards
Transfer of Knowledge Fellowships
Experienced
Individual funding
Intra-European Fellowships
In/Out International Fellowships
Return funding
Conferences Courses
Excellence funding
PhD (or 4 years)
RTNs
Early Stage Training
Early Stage
15
Host driven actions
  • Host institutions/network applies for a number of
    fellows/researchers
  • Hosts proposal is evaluated
  • Selected host/network advertises fellowship
    position and selects fellows/researchers
  • Contract duration with host, usually 4 years
  • Fellows stay depending on Action (up to 3 years)

16
Individual driven actions
  • Researcher applies jointly with host
  • Length of stay depending on Action
  • Fellows who withdraw cannot be replaced

17
Definition of researchers
  • Early Stage
  • Starting a research career, i.e. postgrad
  • No PhD or lt4 years research after first degree
  • Experienced
  • PhD or 4 years research experience after first
    degree
  • Very experienced
  • More than 10 years research experience

18
Transnational mobility requirements
  • Must not have been resident in host country for
    more that 12 months in the last 3 years
    immediately before application (Individual
    actions) or start of work (Host actions)
  • Cannot be a national of host country unless
  • European researcher working outside EU for 4 in
    the last 5 years
  • Dual nationality and have not resided there in
    last 5 years
  • International organisation
  • Return and reintegration grants
  • Note that Excellence Team leaders are exempt

19
Types of Fellowship
  • Research Training Networks (RTNs)
  • Early Stage Research Training (ESTs)
  • Transfer of Knowledge (ToK)
  • Outgoing International
  • Incoming International
  • Excellence Actions
  • Conference

20
Research Training Networks
  • Well defined collaborative research projects of
    recognized international stature
  • Minimum 3 partners in 3 Countries
  • Flexible framework for the Training and
    Development of Researchers
  • (Appropriate mix of Early Stage and Experienced
    researchers)
  • Promotion of multidisciplinary research
  • Up to 3 year fellowships, including short stays

21
Early Stage Researcher Training
  • Higher Education, Research Centers, Enterprises
  • Early stages of their career (lt4 years, i.e.
    predoc)
  • Structured training in research, competencies and
    complimentary skills
  • 3 Year fellowships, including short stays
  • Single Group or Multi-partner
  • Including those involved in International
    Doctoral Studies

22
Transfer of Knowledge
  • Host Fellowships
  • Higher Education, Research Centers, Enterprises
  • Experienced Researchers (gt4 yrs)
  • Develop new areas of competence
  • Develop capabilities in LFRs and Assoc. Countries
  • Industry /Academia exchange possibilities (SMEs)
  • Up to 2 years

23
Transfer of Knowledge Development Scheme
  • To develop or reinforce research potential of
    institutes in need of new competencies
  • Applications by institutions in need of
    developing new competencies
  • All countries, with priority to Community
    LFRs/Associate Candidate Countries
  • Host selects and recruits experienced researchers
    (2-24 months)
  • Possibility to send own staff (2-12 months) to
    pre-determined institutions return

24
Transfer of Knowledge Industry/Academic
partnership
  • To create or develop strategic and durable
    partnerships
  • Application by Industry and academia partners
    from at least 2 different countries
  • Co-ordinating host from industry or academia,
    with one or more partners from the other sector
  • Funding of exchange of experienced researchers
    amongst staff members, in both directions (2-24
    months)
  • Includes SMEs, spin-offs, start-ups

25
Individual Fellowships
  • To respond to the individual advanced training
    needs of the most promising experienced
    researchers to give them the necessary boost to
    become fully independent in their field
  • Fellowships for experienced researchers(gt4 years
    experience or PhD)
  • Training through research, incl. life-long
    training or for resuming career
  • Application by fellow in liaison with host

26
Individual Fellowships
  • Outgoing (OIF) up to 2 1 years
  • EU and Ass. Country fellows to 3rd country
  • mandatory return element
  • Incoming (IIF) 1 to 2 years
  • promising researchers from 3rd country
  • possibility of return support for emerging
    economies

27
Capacity building
  • To promote excellence in European research
  • Marie Curie Excellence Grants (EXT) up to 4
    years
  • To set up or extend teams of the highest level
  • Leading edge or interdisciplinary research
  • Marie Curie Chairs (EXC) up to 3 years
  • Top level teaching appointments
  • Particularly for researchers who wish to resume
    their career in Europe
  • Marie Curie Prizes (EXA)
  • Prizes for excellent researchers who have
    benefited from Marie Curie Actions

28
Conferences and Training Courses (SCF)
  • To stimulate early stage researchers through
    participation of conferences and courses
  • Encourage junior researchers to benefit from the
    experience of leading researchers
  • Variety of Actions (including virtual ones)
  • series of conferences, summer schools, lab
    courses etc. on a theme or linked themes
  • support for junior researchers in larger
    conferences selected for their training interest
  • Duration from several days to 4 weeks

29
Marie Curie funding
  • Benefit of the researchers
  • Living allowance (by researcher category and
    country)
  • Travel costs
  • Mobility allowance
  • Career development allowance
  • Costs of eligible researchers
  • Benefit of the host organisations
  • Contribution to programme expenses (organisation,
    co-ordination...)
  • Overheads
  • Management costs (incl. audit certificate)
  • Other eligible expenses
  • Not all contributions apply to all Actions

30
Researcher salaries
  • Living allowance (reference, cost of living index
    100)

Correction factor for cost of living to be
applied UK 112.5
31
Additional allowances
  • Travel costs depending on distance 250 -2500
    /year
  • Mobility allowance 500 /month (no family) 800
    /month (family)
  • (Correction factor for cost of living to be
    applied)
  • Career exploratory allowance 2000 /fellow (min.
    1 year stay, depending on Action)
  • Training/research costs of eligible researchers
  • 250 -750 /fellow-month (depending on Action)

32
Contribution to researchers example
  • Activities carried out by the researcher
  • Researcher with family, going from Lisbon to
    Paris for 2 years with an Intra-European
    Fellowship under an employment contract
  • Living allowance 47,000 x 2 years 94,000
  • Mobility allowance 800 x 24 months 19,200
  • correction factor 104.7 113,200x
    104.7 117,728
  • Career exploratory allowance 2000
  • Travel costs 1000 x 2 years2000
  • Total contribution for the researcher 121,728
  • Research costs (lab based) 400 x 24 9672
  • TOTAL Community Contribution 131400

33
  • Questions?

34
Proposal submission and evaluation
  • Estelle Kane
  • UK Research Office

35
Outline of the process
  • Published as a call
  • Submit application before deadline
  • Evaluation process
  • Notification of results
  • Contract negotiation
  • Contract signature and start of project

36
Key documents
  • The Call Text
  • A Rough Guide to the Marie Curie Actions
  • The Work Programme of the HRM Activity
  • The Handbook for the corresponding action
  • The Guide for Proposers
  • Guidance Notes for Evaluators
  • Sources
  • UKRO NCP website http//www.ukro.ac.uk/mobility
  • Commission http//fp6.cordis.lu/fp6

37
Proposal submission forms
  • Part A
  • Set of forms on administrative information
    about the proposal and the proposers
    (pre-prepared form).
  • Part B
  • Free-text description of the research project.
  • Series of headings and explanatory notes based on
    the evaluations criteria.

38
Evaluation process
Proposal
Rejection
Eligibility
Individual Evaluation
Consensus
Ethical Issues
Rejection
Thresholds
Ranking by Commission
Negotiation
Rejection
Negative Result
Commission Funding Decision
39
FP6 timescales
  • 17 December 2002 First calls published.
  • From March 2003 First deadlines.
  • First contracts end of December 2003
  • Nov 2003 May 2004 Second deadlines
  • Second contracts 5-7 months after the deadlines

40
Human Resources and Mobility in FP6


41
Making the most of your application
  • Estelle Kane
  • UK Research Office

42
National Contact Points
  • First point of contact for applicants
  • Advice, guidance and information on applying for
    funding, contract management, report writing etc
  • Website and helpline service
  • Training events, publicity actions
  • Liaison between the Member State and the
    Commission

43
General Tips I
  • Read the Work Programme, Guide for Proposers and
    handbook
  • http//fp6.cordis.lu/fp6/calls.cfm
  • Follow the instructions
  • Use common sense
  • IEFs do include confidential referees
    assessment
  • Electronic submission

44
General Tips II
  • Eligibility check
  • Identify your partners
  • Write a concise and clear proposal
  • Meet the deadline

45
Eligibility check
  • Appropriate mix of partners
  • Appropriate geographical mix
  • Meets the aims of the action

46
Identifying partners
  • Ensure a range of complementary expertise,
    countries and human resources
  • Industrial partners
  • No-one along for the ride
  • Previous European experience helpful
  • Meet ALL partners (if possible)

47
Evaluation of proposals
  • Evaluation by competent experts in the field
  • Need to address all of the issues to maximise
    scores
  • Total score for a proposal is 100
  • Some areas require a minimum score (threshold)
  • Each area is weighted
  • In many cases the science counts for less than
    30
  • You must focus on the objectives of the activity
    to be successful
  • Look carefully at the score matrix

48
General Evaluation Criteria Part B
  • Evaluation Criteria/ Proposals Part B
  • B1. Scientific Quality of Project (n.a. for
    Awards)
  • B2. Quality of Research Training (n.a. for
    Awards)
  • B3. Quality of Host (n.a. for Awards)
  • B4. Quality of Researchers (Individual actions
    Excellence)
  • B5. Management and Feasibility (n.a. for Awards)
  • B6. Relevance to the objectives of the
    Scheme/Activity
  • B7. Added Value to the Community

49
Proposal structure for ESTs, RTNS
  • B1 Scientific Quality of the Project or Research
    Training Area
  • B2 Quality of Training Activities
  • B3 Quality / Capacity of the Host(s)
  • B4 Management and Feasibility
  • B5 Relevance to the objectives of the activity
  • B6 Added Value to the Community
  • B7 Previous proposals and contracts
  • B8 Other Issues

50
Weightings and thresholds for ESTs and RTNs
  • EST RTN
  • W T W T
  • B1 Scientific Quality of the Project 10 3 15 3
  • B2 Quality of Training Activities 15 4 20 4
  • B3 Quality / Capacity of the Host(s) 25 - 15 -
  • B4 Management and Feasibility 15 3 15 3
  • B5 Relevance to the objectives
  • of the activity 20 - 20 -
  • B6 Added Value to the Community 15 - 15 -
  • B7 Previous proposals and contracts - - - -
  • B8 Other Issues - - - -

51
Quality of training activities - EST
  • maximum Four A4 pages Table
  • provide a description of the research training
    activities
  • description of the research training programme
    including the field of training, the proposed
    structure, expected durations, and details of
    any complementary training (such as research
    management, presentation skills, ethics, etc.)
  • if relevant a description of the role and
    training provided by each participant
  • a justification of the quality of the proposed
    research training and why it is appropriate to
    the needs of ESRs
  • description and justification of the impact of
    this training within the field
  • where applicable provide a justified description
    of how the proposed project will work towards a
    more co-ordinated approach to the research
    training at an international level and /or foster
    the support of European PhDs .

52
Management and feasibility (1)
  • maximum five A4 pages
  • Describe in the form of an implementation plan
    the practical
  • arrangements for the implementation and
    management of research
  • training project. The plan should describe (as
    appropriate)
  • The organisational management. This could
    include provisions to implement the project,
    description of how the partners will co-ordinate
    administratively and scientifically, description
    of how the partners will reach decisions,
    description of how disputes will be resolved, a
    list of contact persons.
  • The financial management Include the following
    information how the partners will manage and
    distribute the funds if the funds will be
    managed centrally and then distributed to a
    partner when a fellow is recruited or distributed
    to each partner from the start how the
    contribution to the host will be managed will a
    proportion of these funds be retained by the
    co-ordinator.

53
Management and feasibility (2)
  • Recruitment Describe the recruitment strategy
    how will the positions be advertised which
    adverts will be placed and where will mailing
    lists or emails be used etc what are the
    target groups how will the fellows be chosen
    i.e. which criteria will be used and how will
    this be assessed how will recruitment be
    co-ordinated between partners what will be the
    strategy used to encourage an equitable balance
    between men and women.
  • Publicity. Describe the mechanisms that will be
    used to disseminate results and raise awareness
    of the training programme and of the Marie Curie
    actions in general. Will references in
    presentations, publications and web sites,
    posters etc be used ?

54
Management and feasibility (3)
  • Practical measures to implement the training
    Justify the appropriateness of the size of the
    requested training project. Describe
  • how the fellows individual training programme and
    objectives will be agreed
  • how this training will match and be appropriate
    to the targeted researchers
  • the facilities that will be provided to the
    fellows (desk, phone, personal computer etc)
  • the arrangements for access to a supervisor and
    the expected amount of contact
  • the mechanisms to monitor and support the
    progress of the fellow and the expected output
    from each fellow (qualification, report etc)
  • how training will co-ordinated between the
    partners.

55
Relevance to the objectives of the activity (1)
  • maximum two A4 pages
  • Provide justification for the relevance of the
    proposal to the objectives of the action
  • a description of the benefit of the proposed
    training to researchers at the early stages of
    their research career and how the training will
    encourage more junior researchers to progress
    into long term research careers
  • a description of the benefit to the host in
    terms of increased capacity to provide training
    to early stage researchers
  • a description of the impact on early stage
    researchers and contribution (if appropriate) to
    the building of long term collaborations

56
Relevance to the objectives of the activity (2)
  • an explanation (where applicable) of how the
    application enhances intersectorial
    collaborations and or contributes to overcoming
    fragmentation within European Research
  • an explanation of the need for the proposed
    training and the demand for this training and
    the importance of this field for early stage
    training
  • a description of how the programme will
    contribute to the international recognition of
    the training or qualification provided.

57
Added value to the community
  • maximum two A4 pages
  • Considering the following possibilities describe
    and justify how the proposal would provide added
    value to the European Community
  • Contribution to the objectives of the European
    Research Area.
  • Encouraging synergies and structuring effects at
    a European level.
  • Increasing the attractiveness of Europe for
    researchers and improving the gender balance
    within the research training area.
  • Relevance and importance concerning European
    competitiveness or other community regional,
    national or international activities.

58
Proposal structure for Transfer of Knowledge
  • B1 Scientific Quality of the Project or Research
    Training Area
  • B2 Transfer of Knowledge Activities
  • B3 Quality / Capacity of the Host(s)
  • B4 Management and Feasibility
  • B5 Relevance to the objectives of the activity
  • B6 Added Value to the Community
  • B7 Previous proposals and contracts
  • B8 Other Issues

59
Weightings and thresholds for ToK
  • W T
  • B1 Scientific Quality of the Project or 15 3
  • Research Training Area
  • B2 Transfer of Knowledge Activities 15 4
  • B3 Quality / Capacity of the Host(s) 15 -
  • B4 Management and Feasibility 15 2
  • B5 Relevance to the objectives of the activity
    20 -
  • B6 Added Value to the Community 20 -
  • B7 Previous proposals and contracts - -
  • B8 Other Issues - -

60
Proposal structure for Excellence Teams
  • B1. SCIENTIFIC QUALITY OF THE PROJECT
  • B1.1 Importance and relevance of the research
    topic
  • B1.2 Research topic /Quality of the research
  • B1.3 Potential for promoting innovation
  • B2. QUALITY OF THE HOST
  • B3. QUALITY OF THE TEAM LEADER
  • B4. MANAGEMENT AND FEASIBILITY
  • B4.1 Organisational Management
  • B4.2 Selection and Management of Team
  • B4.3 Dissemination
  • B4.4 Financial Management
  • B5. RELEVANCE TO THE OBJECTIVES OF THE ACTION
  • B6. ADDED VALUE TO THE COMMUNITY
  • B7. PREVIOUS PROPOSALS AND CONTRACTS
  • B8. OTHER ISSUES

61
Proposal structure for Chairs
  • B1. SCIENTIFIC QUALITY OF THE PROJECT
  • B1.1 Importance and relevance of the research
    topic
  • B1.2 Research topic /Quality of the research
  • B2. QUALITY OF THE RESEARCH TRAINING
  • B3. QUALITY OF THE HOST
  • B4. QUALITY OF THE CHAIR HOLDER
  • B5. MANAGEMENT AND FEASIBILITY
  • B5.1 Organisational Management
  • B5.2 Dissemination
  • B5.3 Financial Management
  • B6. RELEVANCE TO THE OBJECTIVES OF THE ACTION
  • B7. ADDED VALUE TO THE COMMUNITY
  • B8. PREVIOUS PROPOSALS AND CONTRACTS
  • B9. OTHER ISSUES

62
Weightings and thresholds for EXTs and Chairs
  • EXT CHAIR
  • W T W T
  • B1 Scientific Quality of the Project 15 4 15 -
  • B2 Quality of the research training N/A N/A 15 4
  • B3 Quality of the host 10 - 10 -
  • B4 Quality of the Researcher 15 4 15 4
  • B5 Management and Feasibility 15 - 10 -
  • B6 Relevance to the objectives of the
  • activity 25 - 15 -
  • B7 Added Value to the Community 20 - 20 -
  • B8 Previous proposals and contracts - - - -
  • B9 Other Issues - - - -

63
Proposal quality
  • SELL! SELL! SELL!
  • Quality of research
  • Quality of host
  • Quality of training programme
  • Quality of individual
  • Quality of supervision
  • Quality of language

64
Quality of research
  • Potential of the research
  • Cutting edge research setting it apart from the
    competition
  • Multi- and inter-disciplinary research
  • Innovation and the use of research results
  • Links with other research groups
  • Industrial links
  • Communication structures, plans etc
  • Costs fully justified can include top-ups

65
Quality of host
  • Quality of the research group / organisation
  • Networking with other organisations / research
    groups
  • Infrastructure / equipment available
  • International collaborations
  • Supervision arrangements
  • Mentoring arrangements
  • Assistance with living requirements of Fellows

66
Quality of training programme
  • Training in research methods and techniques
  • Personal Development Plan
  • Complementary skills training ethics, research
    management
  • Transferable skills training cf Roberts
  • Graduate School Provision including RC courses
  • Conferences, seminars, public fora etc

67
Quality of individual
  • Research potential
  • Current research experience and skills
  • Cross and multi-disciplinary experience
  • Work experience (in research)
  • Industrial experience and expertise
  • Transferable skills
  • Prizes, Awards, Lectures etc
  • Give evidence!

68
Quality of supervision
  • Clear framework for supervision
  • Infrastructure incl. contracts / management
  • Mentoring
  • Personal tutors
  • Induction programmes group / organisation
  • Graduate Schools
  • Training
  • Assistance with accommodation

69
Quality of language
  • Understandable English!
  • Avoid colloquialisms
  • Explain all country specific jargon
  • - including organisations, funders, initiatives
  • Well set out include summaries

70
Further information
  • UKRO NCP website
  • http//www.ukro.ac.uk/mobility
  • Queries on the schemes
  • mobility_at_bbsrc.ac.uk
  • Tel 32 2 230 0318 Fax 32 2 230 4803
  • Other useful websites
  • http//www.europa.eu.int/comm/research/fp6/mariecu
    rie-actions/home_en.html
  • http//www.cordis.lu/rtd2002/home.html

71
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com