Title: A RealTime Air Quality Modelling System for Hong Kong and its Vicinity
1A Real-Time Air Quality Modelling System for
Hong Kong and its Vicinity
- Christopher Fung and Linda Yu
- Air Modelling Section, EPD
- Better Air Quality Workshop 2006,
- December 2006, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2Issues to Address to Simulate Air Quality in HK
and Vicinity
- Different temporal and spatial scales of
interactions (wind, emissions, chemistry) - Irregular terrain and land use
- Land-sea interaction in synoptic features
- Photo-chemistry involving many species
- Significant trans-boundary transport
- Scarcity of some input and validation data
3PATH (Pollutants in the Atmosphere and their
Transport over Hongkong) in historical
perspective
- Hong Kong EPD focused on local scale modeling
in the 80s and early 90s with the use of
Gaussian type models - Construction of PATH, a comprehensive regional
scale numerical air quality modeling system,
commenced in 1996 - PATH completed in 2001, focusing on a few
episodes - PATH used extensively in assessment since 1998,
e.g. the Pearl River Delta air quality study - Real-time simulation and forecasting capability
since 2003
4Early Episodes Studied by PATH
Photochemical episode 1 - 11 Oct 94
Photochemical episode 2 - 20 Aug 96
5R-T PATHs Modelling Framework
Met. AQ Observations
Met. Modelling (MM5)
Met. Analysis (ORSM)
AQ Modelling (SAQM)
Verification analysis
AQ forecast
Emission Modelling (EMS95)
Emission Datasets
6(No Transcript)
7Modelling Domain (1.5, 0.5km resolutions) (49X49)
URBAN-SCALE DOMAIN (0.5 KM RESOLUTION)
URBAN-SCALE DOMAIN (1.5 KM RESOLUTION)
8Time Taken for a 72-Hour Simulation(AMD, 2.4GHz,
dual-cpu)
- 3-domains (40.5-, 13.5- 4.5-km)
- Met. Modelling 9 hours (two-way nesting)
- AQ Modelling 18 hours (one-way nesting)
- (run in parallel with the met. calculation)
- Total elapsed time 23 hours
- (including 5 hours for ORSM output)
9Tephigram(blue lines - temperature red lines -
dew point)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15Jan Dec 2004
16Jan Dec 2004
17Results Summary
- Model meteorological outputs compare very well
with observations - Model reproduces the general observed AQ trends
(seasonal, weekly and daily) but tend to
under-estimate peak pollution values - Results suggest that refinement in emission
estimates in PRD (and beyond) is needed to
improve prediction of short-term averages
(hourly) and high pollution episodes - Limitations in handling secondary particles an
upgrade in the chemistry / particulate model is
needed
18Air Quality Science