Anthropogenic Tracers as Indicators of Estuarine Pollution from OnSite Treatment and Disposal System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Anthropogenic Tracers as Indicators of Estuarine Pollution from OnSite Treatment and Disposal System

Description:

Anthropogenic Tracers as Indicators of Estuarine Pollution from OnSite Treatment and Disposal System – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:119
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: dalemc3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Anthropogenic Tracers as Indicators of Estuarine Pollution from OnSite Treatment and Disposal System


1
Anthropogenic Tracers as Indicators of Estuarine
Pollution from On-Site Treatment and Disposal
Systems
In other words Detecting coliform and other
pollutants rapidly, on-site, and confirming their
human origins.
2
Anthropogenic Tracers as Indicators of Estuarine
Pollution from On-Site Treatment and Disposal
Systems
OSTDS Hydrology Indicators Future
Research
3
(No Transcript)
4
On-Site Sewage Treatment and Disposal
Systems(OSTDS)
  • Prevalence
  • Structure
  • Function

5
OSTDSPrevalence
  • 25 of homes nationally (EPA 2007)
  • 33 of Florida (FL DOH)
  • 75 of people nationally live within 80km of
    coastal waters (Colman 2004)

6
OSTDSStructure
Anaerobic
Aerobic
7
OSTDSFunction
75 NH4 25 NH3
Organic Nitrogen
Anaerobic Mineralization
8
OSTDSFunction
Extent of denitrification occurring below the
drain field depends greatly on hydrologic
conditions.
But no matter what, youre getting some nitrate.
NO3-
NO3-
Aerobic
Bacterial Nitrification
NO3-
NO3-
9
So what if it breaks?
Many ways in which failures can and do occur No
agency collecting failure data and efforts so far
have focused only on permit applications and
reported failures, not incidents of contamination
(EPA 2007) So for now, lets just assume theres
a failure. How does it pollute the water?
10
Groundwater Hydrology
  • Soil
  • Aquifer
  • Variables
  • Submarine Groundwater Discharge

11
Groundwater Hydrology
Soil
  • Soils are diverse region to region and locally
  • Distance traveled and residence time of
    biological contaminants is directly related to
    soil type and distance to water table
  • Contaminants travel farthest in saturated,
    coarse-textured soils with large continuous
    pores (Hagedorn 2003)

12
Groundwater Hydrology
Aquifer
  • Eastern FL Two main aquifer systems
  • Surficial (unconfined)
  • Floridan (confined by the 30m thick
    Hawthorne Formation)
  • North IRL Hawthorne Formation is absent
  • Greater opportunity for groundwater to serve
  • as vector for pollutant transport (Cable
    2004)

13
Groundwater Hydrology
Aquifer
14
Groundwater Hydrology
Variables
Long term decrease in potentiometric
surface Seasonal variations in depth to water
table All and more affect the way GW becomes SW
15
Groundwater Hydrology
Submarine Groundwater Discharge
  • All water flowing from the sediment to the
    overlying water regardless of its origin
    (Martin 2006)
  • Separation of groundwater and recycled lagoon
    water must be quantified
  • Benthic advective inputs are still critical
    terms to consider in biogeochemical loading to
    coastal water bodies (Cable 2004)

16
Groundwater Hydrology
Submarine Groundwater Discharge
Low Tech Seepage Meter
May be susceptible to possible artifacts caused
by interaction of tides and waves although such
limitations have not thoroughly been tested
(Swarzenski 2001).
17
Groundwater Hydrology
Submarine Groundwater Discharge
High Tech - Geochemical Tracers
222Rn / 226Ra 222Rn 100 -1000x more abundant in
GW Easy to collect Conservative behavior
18
Groundwater Hydrology
Submarine Groundwater Discharge
  • Other methods of measuring
  • Thermal
  • Chloride (Cl-)

19
Groundwater Hydrology
Submarine Groundwater Discharge
  • Large discrepancies often exist among meters,
    tracers, and models
  • Discrepancies are likely caused by mixing in
    the sediments due to a variety of processes
  • The most important of these processes in the
    IRL is bioirrigation
  • (Martin 2004 Martin 2006)

20
  • So now that we know
  • what it is
  • where it comes from
  • and how it gets there
  • How do we
  • find it
  • and determine
  • anthropogenic origin

21
Anthropogenic Indicators
  • Bacteriological
  • Chemical

22
Anthropogenic Indicators
  • Bacteriological

(Bush 2003)
23
Anthropogenic Indicators
  • Chemical - Generic
  • Chloride (Cl-)
  • Used as a reference to check if other
    parameters can be used to indicate pollution
    (Alhajjar 1990).
  • Electrical Conductivity (EC)
  • Like Cl-, can be used as a reference and general
    indicator suggesting further investigation.
  • pH
  • Nitrification is acid-forming (2H produced for
    every NH4 oxidized)
  • Serve as an indication of pollution since STE is
    in the range of 20 - 130 mg/L NH4 (Alhajjar
    1990)

24
Anthropogenic Indicators
  • Chemical Organic Wastewater Contaminants (OWC)
  • Antibiotics
  • Human or veterinary medicinal (Kolpin 2002)
  • Triclosan (toothpaste, shampoo, cosmetics, etc)
    (Weinberg 2005)
  • Prescription / Nonprescription
  • Persist in STE and percolate to surficial
    aquifer (Godfrey 2007)
  • 75 reduced ltdetection after 2m percolation
    through vadose zone
  • Concentration in GW well correlated with
    community prescriptions

25
Anthropogenic Indicators
  • Chemical biological compounds
  • Coprostanol (Holm Windsor 1986)
  • Formed by enteric bacterial reduction of sterols
  • High incidence in sewage
  • Stable in variable temperature and salinity
    (Bush 2005)
  • Not human specific manatees and porpoises also
  • Cholestanol (Bush 2005)
  • CholestanolCoprostanol ratios
  • Ratio gt 1 human origin
  • Ratio lt 1 indeterminate

26
Anthropogenic Indicators
  • Chemical
  • Caffeine
  • Presence with pharmaceuticals and nitrate is
    clear, unambiguous evidence of anthropogenic
    pollution (Seiler 1999)
  • Only detectable in limited circumstances or in
    the event of failure (Seiler 1999)
  • Caffeine in surface water in Sarasota Bay system
    was positively correlated with fecal coliform
    abundance and with nitrate (Peeler 2006)
  • Clearly, more study is needed.

27
Anthropogenic Indicators
  • Chemical

Fluorescence!
28
Anthropogenic Indicators
  • Chemical Flourometric
  • Flourescent Whitening Agents
  • General
  • aka Optical Brighteners
  • Get your clothes whiter than white
  • 11 major families of highly substituted aromatic
    rings
  • Thousands of formulations exist
  • Conservative behavior
  • Survives OSTDS
  • Subject to photodecay (moving target)
  • Sources
  • Surfactants
  • Some sterols (Steroid alcohols / amphipathic
    lipids)
  • Naturally occurring fluorescence
  • Some species of marine algae
  • Some organic acids (fulvic, humic, tannic)
  • Oil spills

29
Anthropogenic Indicators
  • Chemical Flourometric
  • Fluorometric detection
  • Alhajjar (1990) failed to detect at any
    reasonable distance
  • Hagedorn (2005) reports great success
  • Careful calibration
  • Attention to wind and tide
  • Small boat and motor
  • Plumes are evident
  • Linear concentration gradient is measurable
  • Might be a good place to start testing

30
Future Research
  • GW / SW interface
  • GW components of nutrient cycling
  • Edaphic effects on flourescence
  • Temporal effects on flourescence
  • Triclosan?
  • Caffeine?
  • EDTA et al?

31
Questions?
Thanks for your attention!
  • Dale and Scott McGinnis
  • North Carolina, 1974

32
Literature Cited Alhajjar, B.J., Chesters, G.,
Harkin, J.M. 1990. Indicators of Chemical
Pollution from Septic Systems. Ground Water (28)
559-568. Bush, L., Kurz, W., Powell, L., Powers,
M., Putnam, G., Vandenburgh, E. 2003. Addressing
Microbial Pollution in Coastal Waters A
Reference for Local Governments. North Carolina
Estuarine Research Reserve Report to North
Carolina Coastal Nonpoint Source Program.
Appendix 1, 41-47. Cable, J.E., Martin, J.B.,
Swarzenski, P.W., Lindenberg, M.K., Steward, J.
2004. Advection Within Shallow Pore Waters of
Coastal Lagoon, FL. Ground Water (42)
1011-1020. Colman, J.A., Masterson, J.P., Pabich,
W.J., Walter, D.A 2004. Effects of Aquifer
Travel Time on Nitrogen Transport to a Coastal
Embayment. Ground Water (42) 1069-1078. Florida
Department of Health(a). Division of
Environmental Health. Bureau of Onsite Sewage
Programs. 2585 Merchants Row Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399. (Accessed December 1,
2007). http//www.doh.state.fl.us/environment/ostd
s/index.html Florida Department of Health(b).
Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 64E-6.
Standards for On-Site Sewage Treatment and
Disposal Systems. 64E-6.005 (Effective September
24, 2007). Godfrey, E., Woessner, W.W., Benotti,
M.J. 2007. Pharmaceuticals in On-Site Sewage
Effluent and Ground Water, Western Montana.
Ground Water (45) 263-271. Hagedorn, C., Saluta,
M., Hassall, A., Dickerson, J. 2005.
Fluorometric Detection of Optical Brighteners as
an Indicator of Human Sources of Water Pollution.
Part I. Description and Detection of Optical
Brighteners. Crop and Soil Environmental News.
November, 2005. Hagedorn, C., Reneau, R.B.,
Saluta, M., Chapman, A. 2003. Impact of Onsite
Wastewater Systems on Water Quality in Coastal
Regions. Virginia Coastal Resources Management
Program. Memorandum of Agreement
50312-01-13-PT. Holm, S., Windsor, J. 1986.
Chemical Monitoring of Sewage Effluents Using
Saturated Hydrocarbons and Coprostanol in
Estuarine Waters. Oceans (18) 839-844.
33
Literature Cited Kolpin, D.W., Furlong, E.T.,
Meyer, M.T., Thurman, E.M., Zaugg, S.D., Barber,
L.B., Buxton, H.T. 2002. Pharmaceuticals,
Hormones and Other Wastewater Contaminants in US
Streams 1999-2000 A National Reconnaissance.
Environmental Science Technology (36)
1202-1211. Marine Biological Laboratory. The
Ecosystems Center. 7 MBL Street Woods Hole, MA
02543. On-Site Wastewater Disposal. (Accessed
December 1, 2007). http//ecosystems.mbl.edu/Resea
rch/Clue/onsite.html Martin, J.B., Cable, J.E.,
Jaeger, J., Hartl, K., Smith, C.G. 2006.
Thermal and Chemical Evidence for Rapid Water
Exchange Across the Sediment-Water Interface by
Bioirrigation in the Indian river Lagoon, FL.
Limnology and Oceanography (51)
1332-1341. Martin, J.B., Cable, J.E., Swarzenski,
P.W., Lindenberg, M.K. 2004. Enhanced Submarine
Ground Water Discharge from Mixing of Pore Water
and Estuarine Water. Ground Water (42)
1000-1010. Miller, D.C., Ullman, W.J. 2004.
Ecological Consequences of Ground Water Discharge
to Delaware Bay, United States. Ground Water
(42) 959-970. Peeler, K.A., Opsahl, S.P.,
Chanton, J.P. 2006. Tracking Anthropogenic
Inputs Using Caffeine, Indicator Bacteria, and
Nutrients in Rural Freshwater and Urban Marine
Systems. Environmental Science Technology (40)
7616-7622. Seiler, R.L., Zaugg, S.D., Thomas,
J.M., Howcroft, D.L. 1999. Caffeine and
Pharmaceuticals as Indicators of Waste Water
Contamination in Wells. Ground Water (37)
405-410. Swarzenski, P.W., Martin, J.B., Cable,
J.C. 2001. Submarine Ground Water Discharge in
Upper Indian River Lagoon, Florida. USGS Karst
Interest Group Proceedings, Water-Resources
Investigations Report. 01-4011, 194-197. United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Septic (Onsite) Systems. Ariel Rios Building
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC
20460. (Accessed December 1, 2007) http//cfpub.e
pa.gov/owm/septic/index.cfm
34
Literature Cited United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). Total Maximum Daily
Loads. Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20460. (Accessed
December 1, 2007) http//iaspub.epa.gov/tmdl/envir
o.control United States Geological Survey (USGS).
Gulf of Mexico Integrated Science. Quantifying
Submarine Ground Water Discharge to Indian River
Lagoon, FL. Open File Report 00-492. (Accessed
December 1, 2007). http//gulfsci.usgs.gov/tampaba
y/reports/grwater/index.html Virginia Tech. The
Charles Edward Via, Jr. Department of Civil and
Environmental Engineering. 200 Patton Hall,
Blacksburg, VA 24061. Groundwater Pollution From
Septic Systems. (Accessed December 1,
2007). http//www.cee.vt.edu/ewr/environmental/tea
ch/gwprimer/group03/sgwppollute.htm Weinberg, H.
2005. Use of Indicators to Distinguish Between
Point and Non-Point Sources of Chemical
Contamination in North Carolina Streams. USGS
Project 2005NC44B. Unpublished Progress Report.
(Accessed December 1, 2007) http//water.usgs.gov
/wrri/05grants/2005NC44B.html http//www.d
alemcginnis.com/docs/dale_mcginnis_presentation_oc
n_5210.ppt
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com