Preferred Place of Care Preferred Priorities for Care at the End of Life - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Preferred Place of Care Preferred Priorities for Care at the End of Life

Description:

We will only achieve a real change, allowing ourselves to express our fears and ... where we only get the chance of a good death by battling against the odds. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: nncc6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Preferred Place of Care Preferred Priorities for Care at the End of Life


1
Preferred Place of Care Preferred Priorities
for Care at the End of Life
  • Les Storey
  • National Lead, End of Life Care Programme
  • Principal Lecturer, University of Central
    Lancashire

2
Neuberger, J. (1999) Dying Well. A Guide to
enabling a Good Death.Hochland Hochland Hale.
  • We will only achieve a real change, allowing
    ourselves to express our fears and hopes and
    desires if we are able and prepared to face the
    issue of how best to meet our end, and the end of
    those we love and respect, by discussing,
    talking, arguing, planning and by resolving what
    is still a very patchy situation in this country,
    where we only get the chance of a good death by
    battling against the odds.

3
  • Originally Developed at Lancashire and South
    Cumbria Cancer Services Network
  • by
  • Les Storey, Chris Pemberton and Anne Howard

4
Introduction
  • The PPC is a tool to determine and record patient
    and carers wishes in relation to their care and
    ultimate place of death.
  • A nationally recognised tool for all palliative
    care patients.

5
  • The time has now come for the next stage
    the introduction of palliative care into
    mainstream medicine to give relief but also
    choice to each individual and family.
  • Dame Cicely Saunders WHO 2004 Palliative Care
    The Solid Facts
  • We were actually trying to offer a service to
    an area rather than a little bit of heaven for a
    few
  • Richard Hillier, cited in Clark et al 2005

6
National Initiatives
  • Choice, Responsiveness and Equity Document.
  • NICE Guidance on Supportive and Palliative Care
    for Adults with Cancer
  • Building on the best end of life initiative

7
Building on the Best- End of Life Initiative
  • The success of the initiative reaching non-cancer
    patients will depend on increasing the use of
    LCP, GSF and PPC in DGH, Primary Care and Care
    Homes resulting in
  • Greater choice for patients in where they wish to
    live and die
  • Decrease in number of emergency admissions of
    patients who wish to die at home
  • Decrease in the number of older people
    transferred from a care home to a DGH in the last
    week of life

8
Hospital deaths in Wolverhampton in 2003
  • Cancer
  • 46 are dead within 1 week of admission
  • 67 are dead within 2 weeks of admission
  • Heart Failure
  • 53 are dead within 1 week of admission
  • 67 are dead within 2 weeks of admission

9
Comparing Costs
  • Hospital Care 4,200 per week
  • Community Care 2,500 per week
  • Dispatches Channel 4 18th July 2005

10
Patient Pathway
GSF/PPC
LCP
supportive and palliative care
deterioration
death/bereavement
Preferred Place of Care (PPC) Gold Standards
Framework (GSF) Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP)
11
NICE Supportive Palliative Care Guidelines
24.03.04
  • Patients with palliative needs are identified and
    a management plan discussed with MDT.
  • Needs and preferences should be noted, planned
    for and addressed.
  • Preferred place of care and place of death are
    discussed, noted and measures taken to comply
    where possible.
  • Providers should ensure systems are in place to
    obtain rapid and safe discharge for those who
    wish to die at home.
  • Carers are educated, enabled and supported.

12
Why do patients not die in their Place of Choice?
  • Inadequate assessment of patient needs and
    preferences.
  • Poor coordination of care.
  • Poor face to face communication.
  • Lack of Information.
  • Lack of 24 hour 7 days a week D. Nursing.
  • Inadequate communication between day and out of
    hours medical services.
  • Inadequate equipment.
  • Aging carers or poor family support.

13
A survey by the Commission for Health
Improvement/Audit Commission (2002)
  • Have access to high quality information materials
    in a variety of media, such as leaflets,
    booklets, videos, and the Internet
  • Undergo only those interventions for which they
    have given informed consent
  • Die in the place of their choice, if possible
  • Be assured that their carers will be supported
    throughout the illness and in bereavement.

14
The intention at the outset was that the
Preferred place of care would- record patient
choice, would allow reviews at different points
in their trajectory of care, in a variety of
differing health and social care settings .
15
The Preferred Place of Care Document
  • Guidance notes
  • Demographic Data
  • Family Profile
  • Carers Needs

16
Identifying and Recording Preferences
  • In relation to your illness what has been
    happening to you?
  • Have you had any particular thoughts about your
    care? What would you like or not like to happen?
  • Place of Care - Choices
  • The explicit recording of patients/carers wishes
    can form the basis of care planning in
    multi-disciplinary teams and other services,
    minimizing inappropriate admissions and
    interventions.

17
Services
  • The PPC also records
  • services available,
  • services being accessed
  • reasons for changes in the planned care.
  • It is important that patients have a choice in
    the care they receive and where they receive it,
    although on occasions circumstances will change
    which will make the preferred choice
    unachievable. This should be discussed in
    advance.

18
Benefits of Using the PPC.
  • Patients and family have choices.
  • Choices and Changes recorded.
  • Care trajectory is monitored.
  • Resource implications for services can be
    determined and used to plan future provision.
  • Education needs of patients, carers and
    professionals can be identified and met.
  • Meets many NICE recommendations.

19
Feedback from other organisations using PPC
  • Potentially the most important development in
    services for people with MND
  • Nurses have increased their levels of confidence
    in their communication with dying patients and
    relatives
  • As a result of this project, difficult, complex
    discussions are managed at an earlier stage of
    the patients illness
  • Collaboration between primary healthcare teams
    has improved
  • Patients have confirmed their wish to remain
    involved and to be included in any discussion
    around the planning of care at the end of their
    lives

20
Issues for Implementing PPC
  • Timing
  • Resources
  • Confidence of practitioner

21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Maintaining Hope until Death.
  • If choices and control foster hope, then we have
    a duty to facilitate this through-
  • Discussions with patients and their carers
  • Documentation of choices and preferences.
  • Multiprofessional working to meet the goals.

24
  • Robert, aged 19 had osteo-sarcoma, later
    developed secondaries
  • He had declined specialist input
  • He had stated that when his time to die came, he
    wanted to be at home he was offered a PPC
  • one Friday evening his condition deteriorated,
    his parents called the OOH hours nursing staff
    who were reluctant to administer the anticipatory
    drugs.
  • OOH GP contacted who visited and said he would
    have to be admitted to hospital, and contacted
    Paramedics
  • However, when they arrived, Roberts mum, Julie
    met them at the door, and forced them to read
    what Robert had written on the PPC.
  • The paramedics requested that the doctor revisit,
    and a different doctor then called who set up
    syringe driver.
  • Robert settled after this he was lucid and calm,
    with no complaints other than the dyspnoea .
  • Robert died at home, as he wished, with all his
    family and friends in the room, his dog under the
    bed, and his beloved mobile phone still in his
    hand.

25
Current Activities/Discussions
  • Care Home Pilot Care of elderly
  • Sue Ryder Neurology Care Homes including
    neurological homes and Hospices
  • Lancashire Motor Neurone Disease Care Centre
  • South Essex, Cheshire and Mersey, Sunderland
  • Learning Disability developing user friendly
    version
  • Ambulance awareness and flagging patients
  • Developing evaluation strategy with International
    End of Life Observatory

26
For more information on PPC
  • www.cancerlancashire.org.uk
  • www.cancercumbria.org.uk
  • End of life Care Programme
  • www.endoflifecare.nhs.uk

27
Contact details
Claire Henry Programme Director Mobile 07768
145952 Sally Cook Programme Administrator Office
Tel 0116 222 5103 Fax 0116 222 5101 Mobile
07770 544899 www.modern.nhs.uk/cancer/endoflife En
d of Life Care Programme St Johns House, 3rd
Floor East Street Leicester LE1 6NB
Keri Thomas, National Clinical Lead Gold
Standards Framework (GSF) Helen Meehan, Lead
Nurse Office Contact Katherine Jarvis Tel 0121
465 2029 Email info_at_goldstandardsframework.co.uk
John Ellershaw, National Clinical Lead Liverpool
Care Pathway (LCP) Deborah Murphy, Lead
Nurse Office contact Carole Eaton Tel 0151 801
1490 Email lcp_at_mariecurie.org.uk Les Storey
National Lead Preferred Place of Care
(PPC) Mobile 07836 799094 Email
lstorey_at_uclan.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com