Dynamic Risk Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Dynamic Risk Assessment

Description:

Health & Safety, Ergonomics, Business Risk Management Services ... CALL-OUT EVENTS. Reoccurring but sufficiently dissimilar. Generic risk assessments ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2006
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: matthe209
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dynamic Risk Assessment


1
Dynamic Risk Assessment
  • Carl Williams CMIOSH

2
Human Applications
  • Established 1992
  • Health Safety, Ergonomics, Business Risk
    Management Services
  • Writers/developers/providers of Institute of
    Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) courses
    since 1992
  • Consultants to blue-chip organisations at a
    national level across UK in Europe

3
Recent clients include
  • Police
  • Met, Herts, Leics, Notts, Lincs, Merseyside
    Police Constabularies, Hong Kong Police
  • Fire Services
  • National Criminal Intelligence Service (NCIS)
  • NHS Trusts
  • County, Borough Councils
  • Environment Agency

4
So what is dynamic risk
  • It means different thinks to different people
  • Fire services may believe that, in part, it is
    recognition of transitory hazards that they are
    sure will usually be present at some stage of
    dealing with an incident
  • Some Police services believe it to be more of the
    application of a thought process that justifies
    choice of tactic, or procedural choices for risk
    associated with the tactic deployed
  • So for dynamic risk to work in an organisation
    the organisation will have to decide what it is

5
What is the presentation about then
  • Over the next 3/4 hour we are going to explore
    what a Dynamic risk system will need and where
    this will fit within a risk management system

6
Legal view
  • What do we require to meet Risk base legislation

7
Principles of risk based safety law
  • Risk Assessment
  • Reasonably foreseeable significant risks
  • Record significant findings
  • Risk Reduction
  • As low as reasonably practicable
  • Risk Monitoring
  • Information, Training, Instruction Supervision
  • Competency
  • Health Surveillance
  • Employee Consultation

8
Reasonably foreseeable (significant) risks (RFS)
  • Examine what you do as an organisation
  • Exclude the trivial
  • bizarre
  • Left with RFS
  • Use risk assessment
  • to determine priority

LOW
Excluded Issues
MEDIUM
HIGH
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Competency
  • The key attributes that contribute to a persons
    competence
  • Training
  • Qualification
  • Knowledge
  • Experience
  • Ability
  • There is one further attribute that almost
    defines when someone is competent
  • Knowledge of your Limitations

14
So what is dynamic risk
  • The on-site assessment by competent employees to
    ensure that controls are adequate and/or to add
    additional controls if required
  • This will mean empowering employees to make make
    decisions

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Key causes of bad decisions
Ineffective MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Unsafe BEHAVIOUR
Unsafe CONDITIONS
19
The aim
1. Effective MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS implement
procedures to ensure and maintain 2, then 3
2. Safe CONDITIONS - Design/Layout or
Modifications or Adaptions to achieve inherently
Safe Workplaces Workstations and Work
Equipment/Tools
3. Safe BEHAVIOUR is achieved through ongoing
training, effective Supervision living the
Core Values
1
2
3
20
An example of the importance of core values - The
Fire Service
  • We may risk our lives a lot, in a highly
    calculated manner, to protect saveable lives
  • We may risk our lives a little, in a highly
    controlled manner, to protect saveable property
  • We will not risk our lives at all for lives or
    property that are already lost
  • Source Home Office Guidance

21
Risk appetite
Managing riskto add value - the preferred
position!
High Return
Return
Excessive action tominimise all risks
Exposed destroyingvalue
Low Return
Ignorant of Risk
Management Style
Obsessed with Risk
22
A risk assessment system
Generic Risk Assessments Nationally issued -
covering common tasks and activities
Task Risk Assessments locally produced where no
Generic Assessment
Supplementary Risk Assessments to extend
application of generic risk assessments by
accommodating local or unusual risks
Dynamic Risk Assessment the on-site assessment by
competent employees to ensure that controls from
generic/task/supplementary assessments are
adequate and to introduce required additional
controls
23
Managing risk in dynamic situations
Existing risk controls adequate?
YES


Task
Hazard
Behaviour Competence Filter
Likelihood
NO
Additional risk controls possible?
Risk
x

New risk controls adequate risk deemed
tolerable?
YES
NO
Unknown Until Initial Event
Unknown Until Initial Event
Unknown Until Initial Event
Unknown Until Initial Event
NO
Intolerable Risk (Do NOT carry out task)
Review Learning by Experience(formalise as
appropriate via debrief/feedback)
24
Where does dynamic risk assessment sit
  • PLANNED/ROUTINE TASKS
  • Task risk assessments
  • CALL-OUT EVENTS
  • Reoccurring but sufficiently dissimilar
  • Generic risk assessments
  • Non-reoccurring (the unexpected ones)
  • Always dynamic situations
  • Must be recorded when significant to some degree,
    if it happens once it may then be reasonably
    foreseeable
  • Record when significant or where there is a value
    in others learning from the experience

25
Filtering for significance
  • Clearly not every dynamic event will warrant
    formal feedback
  • Is it clear when it must be made and how?
  • Who takes the decision on what to do next?
  • Amend the RA, SSOW, other controls, training etc
  • How will the new learning be passed to the other
    field operatives?
  • Who will inform more senior management?
  • Need for setting and reviewing guidelines

26
Deciding what degree of feedback is necessary
  • Guidelines
  • No feedback required
  • When its a quick and easy sub-task. Well within
    the competencies of the individual 'field
    employee's. Nothing untoward happened. Current
    risk controls worked well. Record in fault log,
    for example.
  • Feedback must be recorded and management notified
  • When there were unforeseen complications to the
    sub-task further technical advice was required
    existing controls had to be modified in the
    circumstances.
  • Feedback must be formally investigated by
    management, recorded, discussed and the generic
    RA must be reviewed or a new assessment
    undertaken
  • New high risk sub-tasks were identified risk
    controls did not work, had to be ignored or be
    significantly modified.

27
Dynamic risk assessment in a management system
28
So a dynamic risk assessment process depends upon
  • Competent people who are empowered
  • A system to identify the reasonably foreseeable
    significant risks
  • A system that records the significant findings
    from a dynamic risk assessment and feeds in to
    the risk management system

29
(No Transcript)
30

Thanks for Listening - Any Questions?
Human Applications e-mail enquiries_at_humanapps.co.
uk website www.humanapps.co.uk 01509 211866
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com