Discussion of A Dynamic Structural Model of Sales Force Response to Compensation Plans - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Discussion of A Dynamic Structural Model of Sales Force Response to Compensation Plans

Description:

Optimal non-linear plan. Authors' plan F. SALES. SALESPERSON EARNINGS. Salary. Commissions ... averse they might prefer a more certain outcome with small payoff ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: ram68
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Discussion of A Dynamic Structural Model of Sales Force Response to Compensation Plans


1
Discussion of A Dynamic Structural Model of
Sales Force Response to Compensation Plans
  • Ram Rao

2
Research Goals
  • Analyze effect of compensation plan on
    performance
  • Dynamic Structural Model
  • Invoke new estimation methodologies
  • Obtain more reliable estimates
  • Can quotas help?
  • Quarterly quotas, like pacers
  • And how about overachievement commissions?

3
Practical Issues
  • Risk Aversion
  • Salary needed, pure commissions wont work
  • Sales need to be coordinated with production etc.
  • Need to forecast
  • Salespersons are not all similar
  • Heterogeneity

4
What does theory have to say?
  • Risk Aversion
  • Commission rates must be increasing in output
  • Forecast
  • Salespersons must share information and work
    with (self-imposed) targets (quotas)
  • Heterogeneity
  • Quotas must vary across salespersons

5
Theory vs. Practice
Overachievement commissions
Optimal non-linear plan
Authors plan F
Bonus
SALESPERSON EARNINGS
Commissions
Salary
SALES
6
What is being estimated?And how?
  • Sales response
  • Think of them as sensitivity to exogenous
    variables AND state variables, primarily how near
    salesperson is to quota
  • EM with latent class
  • Salesperson disutility for effort
  • Simulation, assuming salespersons are optimizers

7
What do we learn from counterfactuals (pure
commission)?
  • Current plan is best! 23, 15
  • Removing overachievement commissions naturally
    makes exceeding quota to be undesirable, educing
    early period effort to control likelihood of
    exceeding. Revenues and profits 5
  • Quarterly quotas AND bonus keep performance high
    23

8
My take
  • Why might quarterly bonuses work?
  • If salesperson is risk averse they might prefer a
    more certain outcome with small payoff
  • My rough calculation tells me
  • Pr (miss all three quarterly bonus) 1/8
  • Pr (miss annual bonus) 1/2
  • The two events are not independent, but my point
    may be right

9
Behavioral Stuff
  • May be salespersons need pacers
  • Students do
  • Measurements and feedback are known to improve
    performance in many fields
  • Ratcheting is problematic
  • Is there no room for negotiations between
    salesperson and manager?
  • You have to wonder why managers are paid more?

10
WHAT IS THERE TO NOT LIKE ABOUT SUCH NICE WORK?
UNLESS YOU ARE A REVIEWER FOR A PRESTIGIOUS
JOURNAL
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com