Detection Of High Frequency Gravitational Waves At LIGO W'Butler , A'C'Melissinos University of Roch - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Detection Of High Frequency Gravitational Waves At LIGO W'Butler , A'C'Melissinos University of Roch

Description:

University of Rochester. Parametric Conversion 'Picture' Angle of Incidence of the G.W. ... IFO ADMITS A SPECTRUM OF DISCRETE FREQUENCIES. n THE FREQUENCIES ARE ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: William910
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Detection Of High Frequency Gravitational Waves At LIGO W'Butler , A'C'Melissinos University of Roch


1
Detection Of High Frequency Gravitational Waves
At LIGO W.Butler , A.C.MelissinosUniversity of
Rochester
  • Parametric Conversion Picture
  • Angle of Incidence of the G.W.
  • Results from H4K
  • Sensitivity
  • Possibilities with Advanced LIGO

2
PARAMETRIC CONVERSION
  • THE LIGO IFO ADMITS A SPECTRUM OF DISCRETE
    FREQUENCIES ?n
  • THE FREQUENCIES ARE EQUALLY SPACED
  • ?? ???0? 2L/c
  • ?0 IS THE FREE SPECTRAL RANGE (fsr)
  • ?0 37.52 kHz

_____ _____ n1 _____ n _____ n-1 _____
WHEN THE IFO IS LOCKED ONLY ONE MODE IS OCCUPIED
n ?n / ?0 ? 1010 THE WIDTH OF THE
MODES IS ? ? ? / Q Q F (2L / ?) ? 1012
IN THE PRESENCE OF A PERTURBATION AT FREQUENCY
? ? ?? ? ?? THE (n1)
AND (n-1) MODES BECOME POPULATED
3
2. EXPECTED SIGNAL En FIELD IN
MODE n En?1 FIELD IN MODE n?1 ? DIMENSIONLES
S PERTURBATION FOR En?1 ltlt En AND t gtgt Q /
? En?1 0.5 En ? Q
  • 3. EXAMPLE END MIRROR (ETM) MOTION
  • x x0 cos ? t ? x0 / L
  • En?1 En (x0 / ?0) F /1 (? / ??)2 1/2
  • ?? ?0 (? / F)

4
EFFECT OF A GRAVITATIONAL WAVE
  • TRANSFER FUNCTION FOR OPTIMAL INCIDENCE, ?
    0
  • H1(?????) sinc(????) e-i????
  • ? 2L / c 1 / ?0 ?H1(??????????) 0
  • TRANSFER FUNCTION FOR ? ? ?
  • H1(???) cos2? sinc???? ???sin ??e-i????
    sinc???? ??sin ?? ei???? e-i(????)(2sin ?)
  • FOR F-P CAVITY
  • HFP(???) H1(???) /(1- r1)2 4r1
    sin2(??/2)1/2
  • AVERAGE OVER ANGLES, POLARIZATION 1/?5
  • SIDEBANDS AT ?? ? ??????? ? ??

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
RESULTS FROM H4K (2002-W.BUTLER)
  • SHAKE ITMX (SINGLE ARM)
  • EXTRAPOLATE MIRROR MOTION FROM D.C. CALIBRATION.
    (FOR 1V DRIVE)
  • x0(?0) xDC / (1 (?0/?p)2) 8 x 10-16
    m (1)
  • OBSERVE AT A.S.PORT EA
  • CARRIER FIELD ON BS E2
  • SIDEBAND FIELD ON BS ERF
  • EA / E2 4 (x0 / ?c) F (2)
  • PHOTODIODE VOLTAGE
  • VA k E22 ERF / E2 EA / E2 ? 30 EA /
    E2 (V)
  • OBSERVE (FOR 1V DRIVE)
  • VA 3 x 10-5 V ? EA / E2 ? 10-6
  • FIND USING (2)
  • x0 ? 10-15 m
  • IN AGREEMENT WITH (1).

8
(No Transcript)
9
  • SHAKE ITMX (FULLY RECYCLED IFO)
  • PARAMETRIC RESONANCE MUCH NARROWER GOVERNED BY
    DOUBLE CAVITY POLE
  • ?cc ? ?0 (1 rFR)
  • rFR REFLECTIVITY OF FRONT CAVITY MIRROR WHEN
    RECYCLING CAVITY ON RESONANCE
  • SENSITIVITY
  • FOR TINT 100 s OBSERVE
  • VN 2 x 10-7 V (S/N 150)
  • FOR TINT 105 s (1 DAY) EXPECT
  • VN 0.6 x 10-8 V
  • (S/N 5) x0 10-18 m
  • x0 / L h 2.5 x 10-22

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
LIGO WITH SIGNAL RECYCLING
THE RECYCLING MIRROR NOW COUPLES THE TWO ARMS
(CAVITIES)
LASER
THE CAVITY MODES SPLIT INTO ?S ?0 (c /
2L)(1/?) tanarctan (1-r1)/(1r1) cot z/4 ?A
?0 - (c / 2L)(1/?) tanarctan (1-r1)/(1r1)
tan z/4 z 2? (2a / ?) 2a distance between
cavities r1 cavity input mirror
reflectivity LOCK LASER AT ?S SIGNAL APPEARS
AT ?A
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com