Caltech LIGO 40m Prototype: Plans and Progress - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Caltech LIGO 40m Prototype: Plans and Progress

Description:

10m light-years away, solar masses. moving at 15% of speed of light: ... Provides operator and monitor screens. Has code for slow safety interlocking ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: AlanWei7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Caltech LIGO 40m Prototype: Plans and Progress


1
Caltech LIGO 40m PrototypePlans and Progress
  • Intro to gravity waves
  • The LIGO experiment
  • Purpose of the 40m
  • Progress
  • Building renovation
  • Vacuum system controls
  • Pre-stabilized laser
  • Environmental monitoring
  • Data acquisition
  • System modeling
  • Coming soon

2
Warped space-time Einsteins General Relativity
(1916)
We envision gravity as a curvature of space as a
massive body moves, the curvature changes with it.
Einsteins theory tells us that this information
will be carried by gravitational radiation at the
speed of light.
3
Strong-field GR
  • Most tests of GR focus on small deviations from
    Newtonian dynamics
    (post-Newtonian weak-field approximation)
  • Space-time curvature is a tiny effect everywhere
    except
  • The universe in the early moments of the big bang
  • Near/in the horizon of black holes
  • This is where GR gets non-linear and interesting!
  • We arent very close to any black holes
    (fortunately!), and cant see them with light

But we can search for (weak-field) gravitational
waves as a signal of their presence and dynamics
4
Why are we so confident? Hulse-Taylor binary
pulsar
5
Nature of Gravitational Radiation
  • General Relativity predicts
  • transverse space-time distortions, freely
    propagating at speed of light
  • expressed as a strain (?h ?L/L)
  • Conservation laws
  • conservation of energy ? no monopole
    radiation
  • conservation of momentum ? no dipole radiation
  • quadrupole wave (spin 2) ? two polarizations
  • plus (?) and cross (?)

6
Magnitude of GW strain
  • Accelerating charge ? electromagnetic radiation
  • Accelerating mass ? gravitational radiation
  • Amplitude of the gravitational wave (dimensional
    analysis)
  • second derivative
  • of mass quadrupole moment
  • (non-spherical part of
  • kinetic energy)
  • G is a small number!
  • Need huge mass, relativistic
  • velocities, nearby.
  • For a binary neutron star pair,
  • 10m light-years away, solar masses
  • moving at 15 of speed of light

7
The LIGO Project
  • LIGO Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave
    Observatory
  • US project to build observatories for
    gravitational waves (GWs)
  • to enable an initial detection, then an astronomy
    of GWs
  • collaboration by MIT, Caltech other institutions
    participating
  • (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, LSC)
  • Funded by the US National Science Foundation
    (NSF)
  • Observatory characteristics
  • Two sites separated by 3000 km
  • each site carries 4km vacuum system,
    infrastructure
  • each site capable of multiple interferometers
    (IFOs)
  • Evolution of interferometers in LIGO
  • establishment of a network with other
    interferometers
  • A facility for a variety of GW searches
  • lifetime of gt20 years
  • goal best technology, to achieve fundamental
    noise limits for terrestrial IFOs

8
International network
Simultaneously detect signal (within msec)
GEO
Virgo
LIGO
TAMA
  • detection confidence
  • locate the sources
  • verify light speed propagation
  • decompose the polarization of gravitational
    waves

AIGO
9
How does the LIGO interferometer work?
  • The concept is to compare the time it takes light
    to travel in two orthogonal directions transverse
    to the gravitational waves.
  • The gravitational wave causes the time difference
    to vary by stretching one arm and compressing the
    other.
  • The interference pattern is measured (or the
    fringe is split) to one part in 1010, in order to
    obtain the required sensitivity.

10
Initial LIGO sensitivity
LIGO I
AdvLIGO
11
Seismic isolation stacks
12
We need Advanced LIGO!
  • X10 in sensitivity x1000 volume searched
  • LIGO 0.3-3 inspirals/year
  • Adv. LIGO 300-3000 inspirals/year
  • Factor of ten improvement needed at all
    frequencies

13
40m Laboratory Upgrade - Objectives
  • Key elements of Advanced LIGO to be prototyped
    elsewhere
  • LASTI, MIT full-scale prototyping of Adv.LIGO
    SEI, SUS (low-f)
  • TNI, Caltech measure thermal noise in Adv.LIGO
    test masses (mid-f)
  • AIGO, Gingin high powered laser, thermal
    effects, control stability
  • ETF, Stanford advanced IFO configs (Sagnac),
    lasers, etc
  • 40m Primary objective full engineering prototype
    of optics control scheme for a dual recycling
    suspended mass IFO (high-f)
  • Minimize transition time to Advanced LIGO at main
    sites
  • Control scheme set by LSC/AIC, first test at
    Glasgow 10m

14
Arm cavity parameters and LIGO sensitivity
As rITM is increased, Garm is increased, fpol-arm
is decreased.
fpol-arm
We wish to control Garm and fpol-arm
independently to optimize shot noise curve
15
The signal recycling mirror
We add a signal recycling mirror (SM) at the
asymmetric output port. This forms a compound
mirror with the input test masses (ITMs) with
reflectivity
with f kls 2pls(fcarrfsig)/c
16
Tuning the signal response
By choosing the phase advance of the signal
(fcarrfsig) in the signal recycling cavity, can
get longer (SR) or shorter (RSE) storage of the
signal in the arms
f kls 2pls(fcarrfsig)/c
rCC
rITM
RSE
tuned (narrow band)
RSE
SR
SR
17
Using DR to optimize sensitivity
Now we can independently tune hDC and fpolarm to
optimize sensitivity (eg, hug the thermal noise
curve)
18
Cavity control
  • Pound-Drever (reflection) locking used to control
    lengths of all the optical cavities in LIGO
  • Phase modulate incoming laser light, producing
    RF sidebands
  • Carrier is resonant in cavity, sidebands are not
  • Beats between carrier and sidebands provide
    error signal for cavity length

19
Advanced LIGO control scheme
  • Chosen in Aug 2000, from best features of
    table-top prototypes
  • Differences from Initial LIGO
  • 5 cavity lengths DOFs
  • (LCM, LDM, lPRC, lSRC, lmich)
  • SRC does not see carrier light
  • AdvLIGO will use two pairs of
  • RF sidebands (9/180 MHz)
  • Applied before input MC
  • 9 MHz to symm. port, sensing PRM
  • 180 MHz to asym. port, sensing SRM
  • Demod at 171/189 MHz to sense
  • lPRC, lSRC, lmich, insensitive to arms
  • Because of detuned SRC, only one sideband in a
    pair is resonant in SRC/PRC

20
40m Laboratory Upgrade More Objectives
  • Expose shot noise curve, dip at tuned frequency
  • Multiple pendulum suspensions
  • may need to use Adv. LIGO suspensions to fully
    test control system
  • Not full scale. Insufficient head room in
    chambers.
  • Wont replace full-scale LASTI tests.
  • Thermal noise measurements
  • Mirror Brownian noise will dominate above 100
    Hz.
  • Facility for testing small LIGO innovations
  • Hands-on training of new IFO physicists!
  • Public tours (students, DNC media,
    the Duke of York, etc)

21
40m Lab Staff
  • Alan Weinstein, project leader
  • Dennis Ugolini, postdoc
  • Steve Vass, master tech and lab manager
  • Ben Abbott, electrical engineer
  • AdvLIGO engineers/physicists Larry Jones, Jay
    Heefner, Garilynn Billingsley, Janeen Romie, Mike
    Smith, Fred Asiri, Dennis Coyne, Peter King, Rich
    Abbott, Bob Taylor, etc.
  • Collaborating institutions (TAMA, CSUDH)
  • Guillaume Michel, visiting grad student
    (winter/spring 2001)
  • Summer 2000-2001 eleven SURF undergraduates

22
Building renovation
  • Old IFO dismantled, surplus distributed to LIGO,
    LSC
  • Wall removed for added lab space
  • New optical tables installed at vertex, south
    arm, ends
  • Roof repaired, cranes retouched
  • Laser safety enclosure installed
  • New control room, entrance changing area added

23
Vacuum envelope additions
  • 12m suspended mode cleaner
  • Output optics chamber

24
Hardware and electronics
  • Acquired and installed new electronics racks,
    crates, power conditioners, 12 cable trays, etc.
  • Installation of vacuum ion pumps, control system

25
STACIS Active seismic isolation
  • One set of 3 for each of 4 test chambers
  • 6-dof stiff PZT stack
  • Active bandwidth of 0.3-100 Hz,
  • 20-30dB of isolation
  • passive isolation above 15 Hz.

26
Optical Layout
  • All suspended optics (other than MC) have optical
    levers
  • Almost all of 9 output beams come out in this
    area
  • 12m input mode cleaner
  • short monolithic output MC
  • baffling, shutters, scattered light control
  • Currently designing removable covers for all ISC
    tables
  • Have made layouts of all ISC tables, with
    detailed parts lists

27
EPICS Vacuum control system
  • Reads out valve status, pump status, and
    pressures
  • Provides operator and monitor screens
  • Has code for slow safety interlocking
  • Communicates directly with data acquisition
    system

28
Residual Gas Noise Requirement
The plot at left includes the residual gas noise
for a vacuum of 10-6 torr, dominated by water and
nitrogen. At higher pressures the noise becomes
significant at the tuned frequency.
The 40m vacuum system can run as low as 310-7
torr, and has a pressure of 1.310-6 torr in
low-vibration mode (ion pumps only).
29
Pre-stabilized laser (PSL)
We use the same 10-watt NdYAG solid-state
infrared laser as the main LIGO sites. The goal
of the PSL system is to provide frequency and
intensity stabilization, with minimal power loss.
30
Frequency stabilization servo (FSS)
By adjusting the lasers master oscillator to
keep a fixed cavity in resonance, the FSS reduces
frequency noise to lt 1 Hz.
31
Pre-mode cleaner (PMC)
The PMC uses the concept of Guoy phase to remove
all non-TEM00 modes from the main beam, without
reflecting it back to the PSL
32
Environment Monitoring
  • Several seismic sensors
  • 2 3-axis Wilcoxon accelerometers
  • 1-axis Ranger seismometer
  • MetOne particle counter
  • Davis Instr. weather station
  • Still adding more
  • Magnetometer
  • Microphones
  • Line monitor
  • STACIS readout

33
Data acquisition system (DAQ)
Anti-aliasing filters
ADCU 64 analog-to-digital channels sampled at
up to 16 kHz
EDCU collects data from EPICS databases
512 GB RAID array Full data for 48 hours
Second trends for 1 month Longer trends
forever
Sun Ultra 10 Frame Broadcaster Fast
ethernet connection Serves data for
diagnostics Connection to CACR
Sun Ultra 60 Frame Builder Collects data
from DCUs Creates frame files Sends
files to RAID array
34
Interferometer modeling efforts
  • Specification of all optical parameters
  • Cavity lengths, RF sideband frequencies and
    resonance conditions
  • mirror trans., dimensions, ROC, optical quality,
    tolerances
  • Length and alignment control with Twiddle,
    ModalModel
  • Suspensions for 5" test masses modeled using
    Simulink
  • Model of IFO DC response with imperfect optics in
    progress using FFT program (CSUDH group)
  • Model of lock acquisition dynamics using E2E in
    progress

35
Length sensing signals from Twiddle
  • Twiddle is a Mathematica program to numerically
    calculate response of RF demodulation of IFO
    signals in response to motion of mirrors away
    from locked configuration.
  • Can construct MIMO length sensing and control
    matrix.
  • AdvLIGO control matrix much more diagonal than
    LIGO I!
  • Mainly due to the availability of 2 pairs of RF
    sidebands
  • Use double demodulation at asym port for the
    Michelson ( l- ) signal

36
Whats to come?Mode cleaner optics
  • The 3 diameter optics have been polished,
    tested, and sent for coating
  • The suspensions are cleaned, baked, and ready
    for assembly
  • Readying ovens for baking curing of assembled
    optics
  • Experts in April will teach us how to hang and
    balance the optics

37
Whats to come?Length sensing and control (LSC)
  • Each optic has five OSEMs (magnet and coil
    assemblies), four on the back, one on the side
  • The magnet occludes light from the LED, giving
    position
  • Current through the coil creates a magnetic
    field, allowing mirror control

38
Input Mode CleanerCommissioning Schedule
  • Suspensions arrive
  • Optics tested, sent for coating
  • Electronics acquired and installed
  • In-vacuum cabling installed
  • MC end chamber seismic stack installed
  • Electronics cabling, cross-connects installed
  • Optics return from coating, tested
  • Optics prepared for hanging (magnets, bake)
  • Hanging and balancing optics
  • Optics installed in IFO
  • Begin exercising mode cleaner

February March April May
39
Milestones through 2004
  • 2Q 2002
  • Install cables and seismic stacks in mode
    cleaner, output optics chamber
  • Hang and install mode cleaner optics
  • Install suspension controllers, LSC, some ASC
  • Glasgow 10m experiment informs 40m program
  • 4Q 2002
  • Hang and install core optics
  • Complete ASC, ISC
  • Control system finalized
  • 3Q 2003 Core subsystems commissioned, begin
    experiments
  • Lock acquisition with all 5 length dof's, 2x6
    angular dof's
  • Measure transfer functions, noise
  • Inform CDS of required modifications
  • 3Q 2004 Next round of experiments.
  • DC readout. Multiple pendulum suspensions?

40
Summary
  • The 40-meter is on schedule to serve as an RSE
    controls/engineering prototype for Advanced LIGO
  • Significant progress has been made in several
    subsystems
  • Vacuum controls, PEM, DAQ up and running
  • PSL ready pending new table layout
  • Digital suspension controls, some LSC/ASC in next
    2-3 months
  • Expect to exercise mode cleaner in summer 2002
    and full IFO in summer 2003
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com