LIGO and the Search for Gravitational Waves Barry Barish Stanford Colloquium 15-Jan-01 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

LIGO and the Search for Gravitational Waves Barry Barish Stanford Colloquium 15-Jan-01

Description:

LIGO and the Search for Gravitational Waves Barry Barish Stanford Colloquium 15Jan01 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:138
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 92
Provided by: BarryB2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LIGO and the Search for Gravitational Waves Barry Barish Stanford Colloquium 15-Jan-01


1
LIGOand the Search for Gravitational Waves
Barry BarishStanford Colloquium15-Jan-01
2
Sir Isaac NewtonUniversal Gravitation
  • Three laws of motion and law of gravitation
    (centripetal force) disparate phenomena
  • eccentric orbits of comets
  • cause of tides and their variations
  • the precession of the earths axis
  • the perturbation of the motion of the moon by
    gravity of the sun
  • Solved most known problems of astronomy and
    terrestrial physics
  • Work of Galileo, Copernicus and Kepler unified.

3
Einsteins Theory of Gravitation
Newtons Theory instantaneous action at a
distance
Einsteins Theory information carried by
gravitational radiation at the speed of light
4
General Relativity the essential idea
  • Overthrew the 19th-century concepts of absolute
    space and time
  • Einstein gravity is not a force, but a property
    of space time
  • Spacetime 3 spatial dimensions time
  • Perception of space or time is relative
  • Concentrations of mass or energy distort (warp)
    spacetime
  • Objects follow the shortest path through this
    warped spacetime path is the same for all objects

5
General Relativity
  • Imagine space as a stretched rubber sheet.
  • A mass on the surface will cause a deformation.
  • Another mass dropped onto the sheet will roll
    toward that mass.

Einstein theorized that smaller masses travel
toward larger masses, not because they are
"attracted" by a mysterious force, but because
the smaller objects travel through space that is
warped by the larger object
6
Einsteins Theory of Gravitation gravitational
waves
  • a necessary consequence of Special Relativity
    with its finite speed for information transfer
  • time dependent gravitational fields come from
    the acceleration of masses and propagate away
    from their sources as a space-time warpage at the
    speed of light

gravitational radiation binary inspiral of
compact objects
7
Einsteins Theory of Gravitation gravitational
waves
  • Using Minkowski metric, the information about
    space-time curvature is contained in the metric
    as an added term, hmn. In the weak field limit,
    the equation can be described with linear
    equations. If the choice of gauge is the
    transverse traceless gauge the formulation
    becomes a familiar wave equation
  • The strain hmn takes the form of a plane wave
    propagating at the speed of light (c).
  • Since gravity is spin 2, the waves have two
    components, but rotated by 450 instead of 900
    from each other.

8
Gravitational Waves the evidence
  • Neutron Binary System
  • PSR 1913 16 -- Timing of pulsars

17 / sec
  • Neutron Binary System
  • separated by 106 miles
  • m1 1.4m? m2 1.36m? e 0.617
  • Prediction from general relativity
  • spiral in by 3 mm/orbit
  • rate of change orbital period


8 hr
9
Hulse and Taylorresults
emission of gravitational waves
  • due to loss of orbital energy
  • period speeds up 25 sec from 1975-98
  • measured to 50 msec accuracy
  • deviation grows quadratically with time


10
Direct Detection Laboratory Experiment
a la Hertz
Experimental Generation and Detection of
Gravitational Waves
gedanken experiment
11
Radiation of Gravitational Waves
Waves propagates at the speed of light Two
polarizations at 45 deg (spin 2)
Radiation of Gravitational Waves from binary
inspiral system
LISA
12
Interferometers space
The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA)
  • The center of the triangle formation will be in
    the ecliptic plane
  • 1 AU from the Sun and 20 degrees behind the
    Earth.

13
Astrophysics Sourcesfrequency range
  • EM waves are studied over 20 orders of
    magnitude
  • (ULF radio -gt HE ?-rays)
  • Gravitational Waves over 10 orders of magnitude
  • (terrestrial space)

Audio band
14
Interferometers terrestrial
Suspended mass Michelson-type interferometers on
earths surface detect distant astrophysical
sources International network (LIGO, Virgo, GEO,
TAMA) enable locating sources and decomposing
polarization of gravitational waves.
15
Michelson Interferometer
Viewing
16
Fabry-Perot-Michelson with Power Recycling
Suspended Test Masses
4 km or
2-1/2 miles
Optical
Cavity
Beam Splitter
Recycling Mirror
Photodetector
Laser
17
Sensing a Gravitational Wave
h DL/L 10-21
Change in arm length is 10-18 meters
Laser
signal
4 km
18
How Small is 10-18 Meter?
19
What Limits Sensitivityof Interferometers?
  • Seismic noise vibration limit at low
    frequencies
  • Atomic vibrations (Thermal Noise) inside
    components limit at mid frequencies
  • Quantum nature of light (Shot Noise) limits at
    high frequencies
  • Myriad details of the lasers, electronics, etc.,
    can make problems above these levels


20
Noise Floor40 m prototype
sensitivity demonstration
  • displacement sensitivity
  • in 40 m prototype.
  • comparison to predicted contributions from
    various noise sources

21
Phase Noisesplitting the fringe
expected signal ? 10-10 radians phase shift
demonstration experiment
  • spectral sensitivity of MIT phase noise
    interferometer
  • above 500 Hz shot noise limited near LIGO I goal
  • additional features are from 60 Hz powerline
    harmonics, wire resonances (600 Hz), mount
    resonances, etc

22
Interferometer Data40 m prototype
Real interferometer data is UGLY!!! (Gliches -
known and unknown)
LOCKING
NORMAL
RINGING
ROCKING
23
The Problem
How much does real data degrade complicate the
data analysis and degrade the sensitivity ??
Test with real data by setting an upper limit on
galactic neutron star inspiral rate using 40 m
data
24
Clean up data stream
Effect of removing sinusoidal artifacts using
multi-taper methods
Non stationary noise Non gaussian tails
25
Inspiral Chirp Signal
Template Waveforms matched filtering 687
filters 44.8 hrs of data 39.9 hrs arms
locked 25.0 hrs good data sensitivity to our
galaxy h 3.5 10-19 mHz-1/2 expected rate
10-6/yr
26
Optimal Signal Detection
Want to lock-on to one of a set of known signals
  • Requires
  • source modeling
  • efficient algorithm
  • many computers

27
Detection Efficiency
  • Simulated inspiral events provide end to end
    test of analysis and simulation code for
    reconstruction efficiency
  • Errors in distance measurements from presence of
    noise are consistent with SNR fluctuations

28
Results from 40m Prototype
Loudest event used to set upper-limit on rate in
our Galaxy R90 lt 0.5 / hour
29
Setting a limit
Upper limit on event rate can be determined from
SNR of loudest event Limit on rate R lt
0.5/hour with 90 CL e 0.33 detection
efficiency An ideal detector would set a
limit R lt 0.16/hour
30
LIGOastrophysical sources
LIGO I (2002-2005)
LIGO II (2007- )
Advanced LIGO
31
Interferometersinternational network
Simultaneously detect signal (within msec)
Virgo
GEO
LIGO
TAMA
detection confidence locate the
sources decompose the polarization of
gravitational waves
AIGO
32
Astrophysical Signaturesdata analysis
  • Compact binary inspiral chirps
  • NS-NS waveforms are well described
  • BH-BH need better waveforms
  • search technique matched templates
  • Supernovae / GRBs bursts
  • burst signals in coincidence with signals in
    electromagnetic radiation
  • prompt alarm ( one hour) with neutrino detectors
  • Pulsars in our galaxy periodic
  • search for observed neutron stars (frequency,
    doppler shift)
  • all sky search (computing challenge)
  • r-modes
  • Cosmological Signals stochastic background

33
Chirp Signalbinary inspiral
determine
  • distance from the earth r
  • masses of the two bodies
  • orbital eccentricity e and orbital inclination i

34
Binary Inspiralssignatures and sensitivity
LIGO sensitivity to coalescing binaries
Compact binary mergers
35
Signals in Coincidence
Hanford Observatory
Livingston Observatory
36
Detection Strategycoincidences
  • Two Sites - Three Interferometers
  • Single Interferometer non-gaussian level 50/hr
  • Hanford (Doubles) correlated rate
    (x1000) 1/day
  • Hanford Livingston uncorrelated
    (x5000) lt0.1/yr
  • Data Recording (time series)
  • gravitational wave signal (0.2 MB/sec)
  • total data (16 MB/s)
  • on-line filters, diagnostics, data compression
  • off line data analysis, archive etc
  • Signal Extraction
  • signal from noise (vetoes, noise analysis)
  • templates, wavelets, etc

37
Burst Signal supernova
gravitational waves
ns
light
38
Supernovae gravitational waves
Non axisymmetric collapse
burst signal
Rate 1/50 yr - our galaxy 3/yr - Virgo cluster
39
Supernovae asymmetric collapse?
  • pulsar proper motions
  • Velocities -
  • young SNR(pulsars?)
  • gt 500 km/sec
  • Burrows et al
  • recoil velocity of matter and neutrinos

40
Supernovaesignatures and sensitivity
41
Periodic Signalspulsars sensitivity
  • Pulsars in our galaxy
  • non axisymmetric 10-4 lt e lt 10-6
  • science neutron star precession interiors
  • narrow band searches best

42
Stochastic Background cosmological signals
Murmurs from the Big Bang signals from the
early universe
Cosmic microwave background
43
LIGO Sites
Hanford Observatory
Livingston Observatory
44
LIGO Livingston Observatory
45
LIGO Hanford Observatory
46
LIGO Plansschedule
  • 1996 Construction Underway (mostly civil)
  • 1997 Facility Construction (vacuum system)
  • 1998 Interferometer Construction (complete
    facilities)
  • 1999 Construction Complete (interferometers in
    vacuum)
  • 2000 Detector Installation (commissioning
    subsystems)
  • 2001 Commission Interferometers (first
    coincidences)
  • 2002 Sensitivity studies (initiate LIGOI
    Science Run)
  • 2003 LIGO I data run (one year integrated
    data at h 10-21)
  • 2006 Begin LIGO II installation

47
LIGO Facilitiesbeam tube enclosure
  • minimal enclosure
  • reinforced concrete
  • no services

48
LIGObeam tube
  • LIGO beam tube under construction in January 1998
  • 65 ft spiral welded sections
  • girth welded in portable clean room in the field

1.2 m diameter - 3mm stainless 50 km of weld
NO LEAKS !!
49
LIGO I the noise floor
  • Interferometry is limited by three fundamental
    noise sources
  • seismic noise at the lowest frequencies
  • thermal noise at intermediate frequencies
  • shot noise at high frequencies
  • Many other noise sources lurk underneath and must
    be controlled as the instrument is improved


50
Beam Tube bakeout
  • I 2000 amps for 1 week
  • no leaks !!
  • final vacuum at level where not limiting noise,
    even for future detectors


51
LIGOvacuum equipment
52
Vacuum Chambersvibration isolation systems
  • Reduce in-band seismic motion by 4 - 6 orders of
    magnitude
  • Compensate for microseism at 0.15 Hz by a factor
    of ten
  • Compensate (partially) for Earth tides

53
Seismic Isolation springs and masses
54
Seismic Isolationsuspension system
suspension assembly for a core optic
  • support structure is welded tubular stainless
    steel
  • suspension wire is 0.31 mm diameter steel music
    wire
  • fundamental violin mode frequency of 340 Hz

55
Thermal Noise kBT/mode
Strategy Compress energy into narrow resonance
outside band of interest require high
mechanical Q, low friction
56
LIGO Noise Curvesmodeled
wire resonances
57
Core Opticsfused silica
  • Surface uniformity lt 1 nm rms
  • Scatter lt 50 ppm
  • Absorption lt 2 ppm
  • ROC matched lt 3
  • Internal mode Qs gt 2 x 106

Caltech data
CSIRO data
58
Core Optics installation and alignment
59
ITMx Internal Mode Ringdowns
9.675 kHz Q 6e5
14.3737 kHz Q 1.2e7
60
LIGO laser
  • NdYAG
  • 1.064 mm
  • Output power gt 8W in TEM00 mode

61
Commissioning configurations
  • Mode cleaner and Pre-Stabilized Laser
  • 2km one-arm cavity
  • short Michelson interferometer studies
  • Lock entire Michelson Fabry-Perot interferometer
  • First Lock

62
Why is Locking Difficult?
One meter, about 40 inches
Human hair, about 100 microns
Earthtides, about 100 microns
Wavelength of light, about 1 micron
Microseismic motion, about 1 micron
Atomic diameter, 10-10 meter
Precision required to lock, about 10-10 meter
LIGO sensitivity, 10-18 meter
63
Laserstabilization
  • Deliver pre-stabilized laser light to the 15-m
    mode cleaner
  • Frequency fluctuations
  • In-band power fluctuations
  • Power fluctuations at 25 MHz
  • Provide actuator inputs for further stabilization
  • Wideband
  • Tidal

10-1 Hz/Hz1/2
10-4 Hz/ Hz1/2
10-7 Hz/ Hz1/2
64
Prestabalized Laser performance
  • gt 18,000 hours continuous operation
  • Frequency and lock very robust
  • TEM00 power gt 8 watts
  • Non-TEM00 power lt 10

65
LIGO first lock
Y Arm
Laser
X Arm
signal
66
Watching the Interferometer Lock
X arm
Y arm
Y Arm
Anti-symmetricport
Reflected light
Laser
X Arm
signal
67
Lock Acquisition
68
2km Fabry-Perot cavity 15 minute locked stretch
69
Engineering Run detecting earthquakes
From electronic logbook 2-Jan-02
An earthquake occurred, starting at UTC 1738.
The plot shows the band limited rms output in
counts over the 0.1- 0.3Hz band for four
seismometer channels. We turned off lock
acquisition and are waiting for the ground
motion to calm down.
70
170303 01/02/2002


Seismo-Watch Earthquake
Alert Bulletin No. 02-64441


Preliminary data indicates a significant
earthquake has occurred
Regional Location VANUATU ISLANDS
Magnitude 7.3M
Greenwich Mean Date 2002/01/02
Greenwich Mean Time 172250
Latitude 17.78S
Longitude 167.83E Focal
depth 33.0km Analysis
Quality A
Source National Earthquake Information Center
(USGS-NEIC) Seismo-Watch,
Your Source for Earthquake News and Information.
Visit http//www.seismo-watc
h.com

All data are preliminary
and subject to change.
Analysis Quality A (good), B (fair), C (poor), D
(bad) Magnitude Ml (local
or Richter magnitude), Lg (mblg), Md (duration),


71
Detecting the Earth Tides Sun and Moon
72
LIGOconclusions
73
Noise Spectrum 2K Recycled
  • Factor of 200 improvement
  • (over E2 spectrum)
  • Recycling
  • Reduction of electronics noise
  • Partial implementation of alignment control

74
Initial LIGO Sensitivity
  • Frequency noise
  • Improve PSL Table layout (done)
  • Tailor MC loop (done)
  • Implement common-mode feedback from arms
  • Electronics noise
  • Non-linearities?
  • Filters?
  • Alignment?
  • Others?

75
TAMAperformance
76
LIGOconclusions
  • LIGO construction complete
  • LIGO commissioning and testing on track
  • First Lock officially established 20 Oct 00
  • Engineering test runs begin now, during period
    when emphasis is on commissioning, detector
    sensitivity and reliability
  • First Science Run will begin during 2003
  • Significant improvements in sensitivity
    anticipated to begin about 2006

77
(No Transcript)
78
TAMA1000 hour run
86 duty cycle
79
TAMAconclusions
80
TAMAinterferometer stability
  • Signal to Noise Ratio
  • Binary Inspirals at 10 Kpc

81
How LIGO Works
  • LIGO is an interferometric detector
  • A laser is used to measure the relative lengths
    of two orthogonal cavities (or arms)
  • Arms in LIGO are 4km
  • Current technology then allows one to measure h
    dL/L 10-21 which turns out to be an
    interesting target

causing the interference pattern to change at
the photodiode
82
Compact binary inspiral
  • Neutron star binaries
  • Equation of state
  • Size of stars?
  • Thro tidal disruption
  • Black hole binaries
  • Spins
  • Only way to see them

83
Spinning neutron stars
  • Isolated neutron stars with deformed crust
  • Newborn neutron stars with r-modes
  • X-ray binaries may be limited by gravitational
    waves

84
Short duration bursts
  • Supernova hangup
  • Core collapse
  • Other routes
  • BBH merger phase
  • Short duration, high SNR

85
Physical Effects of the Waves
  • As gravitational waves pass, they change the
    distance between neighboring bodies
  • Fractional change in distance is the strain given
    by
  • h
    dL / L

86
Configuration of LIGO Observatories
  • 2-km 4-km laser interferometers _at_ Hanford
  • Single 4-km laser interferometer _at_ Livingston

87
Energy Loss Caused By Gravitational Radiation
Confirmed
  • In 1974, J. Taylor and R. Hulse discovered a
    pulsar orbiting a companion neutron star. This
    binary pulsar provides some of the best tests
    of General Relativity. Theory predicts the
    orbital period of 8 hours should change as energy
    is carried away by gravitational waves.
  • Taylor and Hulse were awarded the 1993 Nobel
    Prize for Physics for this work.

88
Spacetime is Stiff!
gt Wave can carry huge energy with miniscule
amplitude!
h (G/c4) (ENS/r)
89
Interferometer Control System
  • Multiple Input / Multiple Output
  • Three tightly coupled cavities
  • Ill-conditioned (off-diagonal) plant matrix
  • Highly nonlinear response over most of phase
    space
  • Transition to stable, linear regime takes plant
    through singularity
  • Requires adaptive control system that evaluates
    plant evolution and reconfigures feedback paths
    and gains during lock acquisition
  • But it works!

90
Digital Interferometer Sensing Control System
91
When Will It Work?Status of LIGO in Spring 2001
  • Initial detectors are being commissioned, with
    first Science Runs commencing in 2002.
  • Advanced detector RD underway, planning for
    upgrade near end of 2006
  • Active seismic isolation systems
  • Single-crystal sapphire mirrors
  • 1 megawatt of laser power circulating in arms
  • Tunable frequency response at the quantum limit
  • Quantum Non Demolition / Cryogenic detectors in
    future?
  • Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) in
    planning and design stage (2015 launch?)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com