Let us begin anew, remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, that sincerity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Let us begin anew, remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, that sincerity

Description:

New York State Lottery Odds. New York State Lottery Payouts. OK, One More Quick Example ... Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Fisher, R., W. Ury & B. Patton. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: SLE78
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Let us begin anew, remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, that sincerity


1
  • Let us begin anew, remembering on both sides
    that civility is not a sign of weakness, that
    sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us
    never negotiate out of fear, but let us never
    fear to negotiate.
  • - John F. Kennedy

2
Negotiation for the Web ProfessionalTutorialltWe
b2008gt
  • Steven Lewis
  • Web Manager Information Security Coordinator
  • The College at BrockportState University of New
    York

3
Introductions
  • Name
  • Title
  • Campus
  • Define negotiation
  • Describe your last negotiation

4
Overview of Tutorial
  • Strategies for Slicing the Pie
  • Preparation for Negotiation
  • Strategies for Expanding the Pie
  • Human Nature vs. Rational Decision Making

5
Negotiation Scenario 1
6
Negotiation Scenario 1
  • How did you divide the 500?
  • How important was last years spending?
  • What have you learned about your own approach to
    negotiation situations?

7
Slicing the Pie
  • Claiming your share is the most common activity
    employed in all kinds of negotiations.

8
Slicing Strategies
  • Know your BATNA
  • Research others BATNA
  • Set high aspirations
  • Make the first offer
  • Counteroffer immediately
  • Avoid stating ranges
  • Make bilateral concessions
  • Use objective-appearing rationales
  • Appeal to norms of fairness
  • Dont fall for an even split

9
Fairness Types
  • Equality (same for all)
  • Equity (proportional to contribution)
  • Needs-based (proportional to situation)

10
Fairness Context
  • Parking
  • Court
  • Grades
  • Allocation of Benefits
  • Allocation of Costs
  • Dinner on one Check

11
Attendee Poll 1
  • Company A
  • Your offer 75,000
  • Friend offer 95,000
  • Company B
  • Your offer 72,000
  • Friend offer 72,000

In both cases, you perceive that your classmates
have similar background and skill. All other
things equal, which offer do you prefer?
12
Fairness In Comparison
  • Self-enhancement
  • Self-improvement
  • Accurate self-evaluation
  • Professional Athletes Example

13
Fairness People Seek Equity
  • Options
  • Alter Inputs
  • Alter Outcomes
  • Distort your inputs or outcomes
  • Leave the situation
  • Distort others inputs or outcomes
  • Change comparator

14
Negotiation Scenario 2
15
Negotiation Scenario 2
  • What was the subject of this negotiation?
  • How did the two individuals perceive the
    situation at the beginning?
  • How did you overcome this perception?
  • How might the preparation for the situation been
    improved?

16
Preparation for Negotiation
  • Self-analysis
  • Analysis of Others (fairly similar)
  • Assess Situation

17
Analysis BATNA
  • Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement
  • If you cant resolve your differences, where does
    that leave you?
  • You can improve your negotiation outcomes by
    improving your BATNA

18
Analysis Focal Points
  • Reservation Point !important
  • Target Point !less-important
  • Sunk Costs
  • Others
  • Round numbers
  • Last years prices on last years product
  • Someone elses similar experience somewhere else
  • Dont get distracted! Ensure validity.

19
Analysis Issues and Alternatives
  • Seldom need a negotiation be limited to a single
    issue
  • Up-front cost, maintenance fees, time to
    agreement, duration of agreement, training,
    support, division of revenues, addition of goods
    or services, etc.
  • Consider a package of initial offers of equal
    value to you

20
The Other Party
  • Are they all represented at the table?
  • Their BATNA
  • Issue preferences to them
  • End of fiscal quarter
  • Break into new sector, geographic area

21
Situation Relationship
  • How are these situations different?
  • Buying a Car
  • Negotiating a Starting Salary
  • Does Negotiation start a relationship?
  • Will you be back at the table again?
  • Does this establish a precedent?
  • Will this Negotiation affect relationships with
    others?

22
Situation Conflict Potential
  • Scarcity of Resources
  • Differences of Firmly-held Opinions
  • Subject Matter of Negotiation
  • BATNA for a dispute is often court
  • Are there alternatives to agreement?
  • Reagan fired Air Traffic Controllers in 1991

23
Situation Legality
  • Laws vary in states, countries
  • Cultural norms
  • Farmers market vs. Grocery stores
  • Formal vs. Informal agreements
  • Public vs. Private Negotiation, Terms
  • Ratification of deal required

24
Situation Environment
  • Location of Negotiation
  • Intervention of Third Party
  • Time-related Costs
  • Number of Offers
  • Power Differential between Parties
  • Communication Styles

25
Negotiation Scenario 3
26
Negotiation Scenario 3
  • How much did you communicate with each other
    about the situation?
  • How might the web team improve its BATNA?
  • How might IT manager better prepare for meeting?

27
Expanding the Pie
  • Negotiation is about more than a fixed division
    of a single resource (Pie)
  • Better deals are when both sides get what they
    want --- a win-win situation
  • Make the Pie bigger so that you both get more
    than half
  • A.k.a. Integrative Negotiation

28
Clear Opportunities for Win-Win
  • Negotiation on more than one issue
  • Possibility of side deals
  • Different issue preferences between parties

29
Obstacles to Win-Win
  • False Conflict
  • Fixed-pie Perception
  • Illusion of Transparency

30
False Strategies
  • Commitment to Win-Win Outcome
  • Compromise (concession for concession)
  • Focus on long-term relationship
  • Cooperative orientation
  • Taking extra time

31
Good Strategies
  • Build trust and share info
  • Ask questions about preferences
  • Give information about preferences
  • Unbundle the issues
  • Make package deals on gt1 issue
  • Make multiple offers simultaneously
  • Pre-Settlement Settlements
  • Post-Settlement Settlements

32
Contingency Contracts
  • Take advantage of differences
  • Issue valuation
  • Predictions of the future
  • Risk attitudes
  • Time preferences
  • Capabilities

33
Negotiation Scenario 4
34
Negotiation Scenario 4
  • How much did you communicate?
  • Do you feel either side won?

35
Rational Decision-Making
  • Evaluate options based on expected outcomes
  • The sum of the probability of each outcome times
    its value
  • P(A)V(A)P(B)V(B)

36
One Quick Example
  • New York State Lottery Odds
  • New York State Lottery Payouts

37
OK, One More Quick Example
  • Deal or No Deal
  • 25 briefcases with dollar values
  • You pick one
  • You open x briefcases, removing dollar values
    from play
  • Banker makes an offer that is almost always lower
    than your current expected outcome

38
Attendee Poll 2
  • I give you 5,000
  • You flip a coin onto the floor. If it lands
    heads, I give you 10,000. If it lands tails, I
    give you nothing.

39
Risk-avoiding Behavior
  • Fundamental Negotiation Behavior
  • Faced with good options, we tend to risk a sure
    thing to take a change for even a better thing.

40
Attendee Poll 3
  • Pay 20,000 to cover drink tickets
  • Cover all drinks on consumption, whose expected
    outcome is 20,000, weighing all probabilities

41
Risk-seeking Behavior
  • Fundamental Negotiation Behavior
  • Faced with bad options, we tend to risk seeking
    an option with the potential for a less painful
    outcome, even if we could end up worse

42
Risk and Uncertainty
  • At the end of an agreement, future conditions are
    not known.
  • Both parties enter a negotiation with assumptions
    about the future, good or bad
  • Parties with negative outlooks (risk-seeking)
    tend to be more willing to make integrative
    agreements, since they often involve
    contingencies.

43
Choosing versus Rejecting
  • Consider an enriched and an impoverished
    choice
  • Enriched More positive and negative
  • Impoverished fewer positive and negative
  • Asked a sample to choose the better option, they
    chose Enriched
  • Asked a sample to reject the worst option, they
    chose Enriched!

44
A Quick Negotiation Process
  • People, not the challenges
  • Interests, not positions
  • Create new options for mutual gain (expand the
    pie)
  • Avoid subjective criteria
  • From Getting to Yes

45
A Definition of Negotiation
  • An interpersonal decision-making process by
    which two or more people agree how to allocate
    scarce resourcesThe Mind and Heart of the
    Negotiator

46
Sources Resources
  • Thompson, L. (2001) The mind and heart of the
    negotiator. Upper Saddle River, NJ
    Prentice-Hall.
  • Fisher, R., W. Ury B. Patton. (1991) Getting
    to yes Negotiating agreement without giving in.
    2nd ed. New York Penguin Books.
  • Nierenberg, G. I. (1968) The art of negotiating.
    Rpt (1995) New York Barnes Noble Books.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com