Medical Records in Court: Life after HIPAA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Medical Records in Court: Life after HIPAA

Description:

In general, a state law is more stringent if it affords greater privacy ... term 'HIPAA' used to refer to all of medical confidentiality law federal and state. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: iog
Category:
Tags: hipaa | court | hippa | law | life | medical | records

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Medical Records in Court: Life after HIPAA


1
Medical Records in CourtLife after HIPAA
  • North Carolina Conference of Superior Court
    Judges, October 2003
  • Presented by
  • Jill Moore, UNC School of Government

2
Roadmap
  • Fundamentals of the HIPAA privacy rule
  • History
  • HIPAA vs. state law
  • Covered entities
  • Protected health information (PHI)
  • Disclosures of PHI for court proceedings
  • How has HIPAA changed the landscape?

3
HIPAA History
  • Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
    Act of 1996
  • Administrative Simplification provisions
  • Health care industry conducting electronic
    transactions with many different codes and
    languages ? high administrative costs
  • Unable to agree on voluntary standards, so
    requested regulation
  • DHHS directed to establish standards, plus
    provide for privacy and security of the
    information

4
HIPAA vs. state law
  • HIPAA privacy rule intended to be a federal floor
    of privacy protection, by regulating the use and
    disclosure of health information and individuals
    rights respecting that information
  • HIPAA preempts contrary state laws, unless the
    contrary law is more stringent
  • In general, a state law is more stringent if it
    affords greater privacy protection or provides an
    individual more rights

5
HIPAA vs. state law
  • The hole in the federal floor State laws that
    require disclosures of health information are not
    preempted
  • State laws only preempted if they are contrary to
    HIPAA
  • HIPAA privacy rule specifically allows
    disclosures of PHI that are required by state law
  • State laws requiring disclosures are therefore
    not contrary and not preempted

6
HIPAA vs. state law
  • General rules for NC covered entitiesmust comply
    with
  • HIPAA privacy rule
  • State laws requiring disclosures
  • Example GS 130A-135physicians shall report
    communicable diseases to health department
  • State laws that are more protective of privacy or
    afford greater individual rights
  • Example GS 130A-143may disclose communicable
    disease information only in specified
    circumstances

7
Covered entities
  • HIPAA directly regulates only public and private
    covered entities
  • Health plans
  • Health care clearinghouses
  • Health care providers that transmit health
    information electronically in connection with a
    transaction covered by HIPAA

8
Protected health information
  • The HIPAA privacy rule governs how covered
    entities use and disclose protected health
    information (PHI)
  • PHI is information in any form or medium,
    including electronic and paper records, and oral
    communications

9
Protected health information
  • PHI is information that
  • Identifies an individual (or there is a
    reasonable basis to believe it can be used to
    identify the individual), and
  • Relates to one of the following
  • the past, present, or future physical or mental
    health or condition of the individual,
  • the provision of health care to the individual,
    or
  • the past, present, or future payment for the
    provision of health care.

10
Disclosing PHI
  • General ruleDisclosure of PHI requires the
    individuals authorization
  • Authorization must be in writing
  • Forms must include elements specified by the
    HIPAA privacy rule

11
Disclosing PHI
  • ExceptionsDisclosure without written
    authorization is permitted
  • When disclosure is required by privacy rule (only
    two circumstances disclosures to individual
    disclosures to US DHHS for compliance or
    enforcement purposes)
  • For treatment, payment, and health care operations

12
Disclosing PHI
  • Exceptions (continued)Disclosure without written
    authorization permitted
  • For certain purposes, such as hospital
    directories, provided the individual is given an
    opportunity to agree or object to the disclosure
  • For national priority purposesamong other
    things, child abuse reporting, public health
    purposes, judicial and administrative proceedings

13
Disclosing PHI for court proceedings
  • Must consider both HIPAA and state law
  • HIPAA permits disclosure of PHI in judicial
    proceedings without the individuals written
    authorization, provided certain requirements are
    met
  • But in North Carolina, much PHI will be
    privileged and may only be disclosed in
    accordance with applicable privilege statutes
  • State privilege statutes afford greater privacy
    protection and are therefore not preempted

14
Disclosing PHI for court proceedings
  • Medical records and information usually will be
    privileged, so disclosure will require either
  • the individuals authorization, or
  • a court order compelling disclosure, if in the
    courts opinion disclosure is necessary for a
    proper administration of justice
  • But information that is PHI per HIPAA but not
    privileged per state law may be disclosed in
    accordance with HIPAA procedures

15
Disclosing PHI for court proceedings
  • If the information is privileged and disclosure
    is made with the individuals authorization
  • A covered entity may not disclose the record or
    information unless the authorization is in
    writing and includes all the elements required by
    HIPAA
  • Entities covered only by state law will also
    require written authorization, but their forms
    may look different

16
Disclosing PHI in court proceedings
  • If the information is privileged and the
    individual has not authorized disclosure, the
    information cannot be disclosed without the
    requisite findings and court order
  • This applies equally to HIPAA-covered entities
    and entities that are subject only to state law

17
Disclosing PHI in court proceedings
  • If the information is not privileged but it is
    PHI, a covered entity may only disclose it
  • With the individuals written authorization, or
  • According to the procedures set forth in the
    HIPAA privacy rule for disclosing without the
    individuals authorization.

18
Disclosing PHI in court proceedings
  • A covered entity may disclose PHI that is not
    privileged without the individuals authorization
    in response to
  • A court order, provided the entity discloses only
    the PHI expressly authorized by the order.
  • A subpoena, a discovery request, or other lawful
    process without a court order if
  • Reasonable efforts are made to notify the
    individual that disclosure is sought, or
  • Reasonable efforts are made to secure a qualified
    protective order (as defined in the privacy rule).

19
How has HIPAA changed the landscape?
  • Many holders of health information are covered
    entities and must comply with both HIPAA and
    state lawsincluding some that are not ordinarily
    seen as health care providers.

20
How has HIPAA changed the landscape?
  • Confusion abounds. Expect
  • To hear the term HIPAA used to refer to all of
    medical confidentiality lawfederal and state.
  • Misperceptions about who is covered by HIPAA.
  • Misunderstandings about how a covered entity may
    (and must) respond to subpoenas for medical
    records or information.
  • False beliefs about when a covered entity can and
    cannot disclose under HIPAA.
  • False beliefs about the continued viability of
    state law.

21
What has HIPAA changed? What remains the same?
  • Disclosures in court proceedings Privileged
    information
  • Changed
  • Disclosures with individuals authorization must
    be in writing and include specific elements
  • Unchanged
  • Disclosures without individuals authorization
    require court order

22
What has HIPAA changed? What remains the same?
  • Disclosures in court proceedings PHI that is not
    privileged
  • Changed
  • Disclosures with individuals authorization must
    be in writing and include specific elements
  • Disclosures without individuals authorization
    only permitted in response to
  • a court order
  • a subpoena, discovery request or other lawful
    process with notice or protective order

23
What has HIPAA changed? What remains the same?
  • Disclosures in court proceedings Health
    information held by an entity that is not a
    covered entity under HIPAA
  • Unchanged by HIPAA
  • Other disclosures that may be litigated
  • Unchanged by HIPAA
  • But will HIPAA ultimately change standard of care?

24
Jill Moore UNC School of Government CB 3330 Knapp
Building Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330 919-966-4442 j
ill_moore_at_unc.edu www.medicalprivacy.unc.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com