Distribution Integrity Management Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Distribution Integrity Management Program

Description:

What does a leak mean? Leaks caused by excavation damage does not indicate integrity / condition of an ... Evaluate Assess severity of leak based on risk posed ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: paulp164
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Distribution Integrity Management Program


1
Distribution Integrity Management Program
  • Mike Beatty South Carolina Electric Gas
  • Phillip Murdock Atmos Energy
  • Southern Gas Association
  • Operating Conference
  • Houston, Texas
  • July 18, 2006

2
Distribution Integrity Management
  • Mandated by Congress
  • PHMSA did Phase 1 work in 2005
  • Work products
  • June 2005 Report to Congress
  • DIMP report in December 2005
  • 1.9 million miles of distribution pipelines
  • Not like transmission IMP
  • Concentrate on areas of biggest impact

3
Distribution Integrity Phase 2
  • Rulemaking ?Guidance Pipeline Safety
  • (DOT PHMSA) (GPTC)
    Reauthorization
  • __________________________________________________
    ____________
  • Rulemaking (DOT PHMSA)
  • Rule will have a significant impact
  • Cost / Benefit Analysis will be required
  • May contain appendices pending completion of
    Guide Material.
  • Currently drafting (ex-parte mode) - Proposal
    will come out in October 2006
  • Final rule - September 2007 Implement - 2009

4
High-level Flexible Rule Seven Elements
  • Develop written integrity program plan
  • Know your infrastructure
  • Identify the threats
  • Assess prioritize risks
  • Implement appropriate measures to mitigate risks
  • Measure performance, monitor results evaluate
    effectiveness of program adjust if needed to
    improve
  • Report results

5
Distribution Integrity
  • Guidance (GPTC)
  • DIMP Task Group with Multi-Stakeholders
  • Stand Alone Guidance v. Traditional Guidance
  • GPTC is currently Discussing, Cussing and Editing
  • How much is too little? Too much? Double edged
    sword!!
  • Iterative Process. Guidance normally prepared
    after final rule.
  • GPTC writing potential regulatory provisions.
    Inclusion in final rule (Preamble)? Adoption by
    states? States use as enforcement (protocols)
    guidance?

6
Pipeline Safety Reauthorization
  • May contain date certain for implementing DIMP
    rule?
  • Language mandating installation of EFVs?
  • Legislation on excavation damage prevention
  • Incentives for states to increase effectiveness
  • Continued funding for state One-Call grants
  • Continued funding for Common Ground Alliance

7
Improving Distribution System Safety
  • Focus on
  • areas of biggest impact

8
What We Have Learned Total Incidents
9
Corrosion (C), Material / Weld (MW), Equipment /
Operator Error (EOE)
Excavation/Mechanical Damage, Natural Force,
Other Outside Force
Source US DOT/OPS Reportable Incident Database
10
Distribution Integrity ManagementBiggest Impact
  • - Reduce excavation damage incidents -- 1
    Threat
  • - Enhance leak management confidence
  • - Other risk control (EFVs, repair/replacement,
    OM
  • plan, emergency procedures)

11
Excavation Damage Prevention
  • Enhancements in
  • Operator-excavator communications
  • Partnership w/ all stakeholders
  • Communications
  • Training
  • Public Education
  • Enforcement
  • Use of technology to improve one-call process
  • Fair and effective enforcement
  • Approaches
  • Federal legislation (in 2006 reauthorization)
  • Analysis of performance to verify effectiveness
  • Use CGA Best Practices as basis for initial
    discussions
  • Adjust if necessary

12
Leak Management
  • Is used to control risk
  • Effective leak management programs
  • Fewer incidents
  • Still subject to significant variations due to
    diversity among operators
  • What does a leak mean? Leaks caused by
    excavation damage does not indicate integrity /
    condition of an operators system!

13
Leak Management Framework
  • Locate -- Leak surveys other detection means
  • Evaluate Assess severity of leak based on risk
    posed
  • Act Remediate, or reduce risk and/or monitor
  • Keep records Collect key data to increase
  • knowledge of system
  • Self-assess Measure performance adjust if
    necessary

14
Excess Flow ValvesA Risk Control Option
  • Installation should not be mandated
  • Stakeholders on DIMP (state, industry public)
    agree on a risk-based approach installation
    decision criteria
  • Industry prefers a recommendation for operators
    to consider EFVs based on risk
  • Hope for increased use by operators

15
Other Considerations
  • Possible revision(s) to DOT Annual Report
  • of Locates
  • of Locate Tickets
  • Leaks Repaired Requiring Immediate Response
  • Leaks due to Excavation Damage
  • Possible revision(s) to DOT Incident Report
  • Collect Additional Data to Enable Root Cause
    Analysis
  • Revising reports may be a separate initiative
    paralleling Distribution Integrity Management

16
Resources
  • SGA - Distribution Integrity Management Interest
    Group http//www.sgalink.org/forum/categories.cfm?
    catid35
  • PHMSA/OPS (Cycla is a PHMSA contractor)
    http//www.cycla.com/opsiswc/wc.dll?webmainsubsys
    temhomesub22
  • DOT Document Management System http//www.dms.dot.g
    ov click on "Simple Search" and type in 19854.

17
Resources - SGA
18
Resources - PHMSA
19
Resources DOT
20
?Q u e s t i o n sSpecial thanks to George
Mosinkis _at_ American Gas Association for his
contribution to this presentation
21
Lets Take a BreakReconvene in Roundtable
Format
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com