Uses of Logic: Argumentation and Boolean Algebra - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Uses of Logic: Argumentation and Boolean Algebra

Description:

Boolean Algebra. A more mathematical logic formalization ... Boolean algebra is an isomorphism of the formal logic we have developed -- the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: rober52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Uses of Logic: Argumentation and Boolean Algebra


1
Uses of Logic Argumentation and Boolean Algebra
  • Reading
  • Rosen 3.1 - 3.2, 9.1 - 9.2, and 9.4 (Karnaugh
    map section only)

2
How can we use logic?
  • Formal proofs
  • We will discuss a few simple kinds of proof
  • Every proof has a sound logical basis
  • Boolean Algebra
  • A more mathematical logic formalization
  • Leads to important ideas in digital circuits and
    computer hardware

3
The Nature of Proof
  • We usually want to prove implications (for
    example, If n is even, then n2 is also even.)
    -- usually truths that depend on other truths
  • We try to show that knowing the if part is true
    leads logically to certain truths that make up
    the then part
  • If each step is logically sound, then you must
    accept the end result

4
The Direct Proof
  • Proving that the statement pq is true by showing
    that p logically leads to q
  • Predicate calculus applies here for true
    correctness
  • Example If n is even, then n2 is even.
  • P(n) n is even
  • Q(n) n2 is even
  • The statement is really "n (P(n) Q(n)) where
    the universe of discourse is (nonnegative)
    integers

5
Direct Proof Example
  • Let n be an element in the universe of discourse
  • Assume n is even, show its square is even
  • n even 2 must be one of its prime factors
  • Thus, n n n2 has 22 in its prime
    factorization
  • Since 2 is one of n2s prime factors, n2 is even
  • Logically, we show pq by following a chain of
    implications (pa, ab, bq, thus pq)
  • Usually, the sub-implications are small steps
    leading toward the big truth

6
Indirect Proof
  • Since pq is logically equivalent to ØqØp
    (contrapositive law!), you can prove the former
    by directly proving the latter this is called an
    indirect proof
  • Lets prove the statement we just examined
    indirectly -- in other words, show that "n (ØQ(n)
    ØP(n))

7
Indirect Proof Example
  • Let n be an element in the universe of discourse
  • Assume n2 is not even
  • Then 2 is not a prime factor of n2
  • Therefore, 2 cannot appear in the prime
    factorization of n (or else it would have in
    n2s)
  • So, n is not even

8
Proof by Contradiction
  • Show that pq is true by initially assuming that
    pÙØq is true
  • Contradiction arises because Øq logically leads
    to Øp since pq is actually true, and thus we get
    pÙØp
  • Thus pÙØq is false, and its negation must be
    true, but its negation is exactly equivalent to
    the original implication
  • In general contradiction proof, assume the
    negation of what you are trying to prove

9
Proof By Contradiction Ex.
  • Proof by contradiction is similar to an indirect
    proof
  • Ex. If n is even, n2 is even
  • Assume n is even, but n2 is odd
  • Since n2 is odd, 2 is not a prime factor of n2,
    so 2 is not a prime factor of n either
  • Thus, n is odd -- contradicts assumption
  • NOTE for pq, dont assume ØpÙq and then show Øq
    -- this proves nothing!

10
Another Contradiction Ex.
  • Prove that Ö (2) is not a rational number
  • Assume that it is, and so it can be expressed as
    a lowest-terms fraction of two integers a/b (a
    and b have no common factors)
  • So 2 a2/b2, and 2b2 a2, so a2 is even
  • Since a2 is even, a is even (note that this is
    just the contrapositive of what we proved
    earlier)
  • Thus, a 2c where c is some integer, and
    therefore 2b2 4c2 2(2c2)
  • So b is also even, thus a and b are both
    divisible by 2, but the fraction was in lowest
    terms, so there is a contradiction -- assumption
    was false

11
Boolean Algebra
  • The rules of Boolean algebra provide a bridge
    from logic to mathematics
  • Boolean algebra is an isomorphism of the formal
    logic we have developed -- the two are
    expressively equivalent
  • a AND b ab
  • a OR b sgn(a b)
  • NOT a a
  • True 1 False 0
  • literal Boolean variable or its complement
  • Algebraic order of operations applies

12
Some Examples
  • Evaluations
  • pq 1 for p q 1 0 for p 0, q 1
  • p qr 1 for p 1, q r 0
  • Propositions to Boolean Algebra
  • Ø(p Ù q) becomes pq
  • (p Ù q) Ú (Øp Ù r) becomes pq pr
  • In particular, the logical equivalences have
    algebraic equivalents
  • e.g. p Ù (q Ú r) Û (p Ù q) Ú (p Ù r) becomes p(q
    r) pq pr (look familiar??)

13
Sum-Of-Products Expansions
  • A minterm of a set of Boolean variables is a
    Boolean product where each variable or its
    complement must appear exactly once
  • For x, y, and z, some minterms are xyz, xyz, xyz
  • There are at most 2n Boolean functions over n
    variables (why?)
  • Given any Boolean function over n variables, we
    can express it as a sum of minterms of the n
    variables

14
Sum Of Products Example
F xyz xyz G xyz xyz xyz
15
Minimizing SP Expansions
  • While simple, this technique for generating
    expressions for Boolean functions often produces
    ones which are very large
  • A method called the Karnaugh map can help
    simplify the expressions
  • Basic idea is to study variation in minterms that
    differ by one variable

16
Karnaugh Map Examples
y
y
Put a 1 in the box for any minterm that appears
in the SP expansion. Basic idea is to cover the
largest adjacent blocks you can whose side length
is some power of 2. Blocks can wrap around the
edges. For example, the first K-map
here represents xy xy x(y y) x. The
second K-map, similarly, shows xy xy (x x)y
y.
x
1
1
x
y
y
x
1
x
1
17
Examples in 3 Variables
yz
yz
yz
yz
1
x
1
1
xz yz
1
x
yz
yz
yz
yz
1
1
1
x
z xy xy
1
x
1
1
18
K-maps and Circuits
  • We will see next time that K-maps can help us
    make more efficient circuits
  • K-maps are not suitable for mechanization because
    they involve visual inspection of many
    possibilities
  • Quine-McCluskey method used for mechanization --
    I do not expect you to know this method
  • I do not expect you to be able to K-map past
    three variables
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com