Role of Neighboring FMN Side Chains in the Modulation of Flavin Reduction Potentials and in the Ener - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Role of Neighboring FMN Side Chains in the Modulation of Flavin Reduction Potentials and in the Ener

Description:

Role of Neighboring FMN Side Chains in the Modulation of Flavin Reduction ... is the Bohr magneton. B is the applied magnetic field. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: geor60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Role of Neighboring FMN Side Chains in the Modulation of Flavin Reduction Potentials and in the Ener


1
Role of Neighboring FMN Side Chains in the
Modulation of Flavin Reduction Potentials and in
the Energetics of the FMNApoprotein Interaction
in Anabaena Flavodoxin.
  • Carrie George
  • BMB III
  • December 6, 2004

2
Ferredoxin in Photosynthesis
3
Where does Flavodoxin come in?
  • During low iron conditions flavodoxin replaces
    ferredoxin.
  • Flavodoxin contains FMN instead of iron
  • FMN is an isoalloxazine ring capable of holding
    an unpaired electron on one of its Nitrogens

4
Oxidation States of FMN
FMNH
Semiquinone Intermediate
1e-
1e-
Hydroquinone
Quinone
5
Flavodoxins
  • Aka Flds
  • FMN resides in a 20 Å pocket inside the
    flavoprotein
  • 2 classes of flavodoxins
  • Short chain 150 aa
  • Long chain 170 aa

http//strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/kay/pdfs
/flavodoxin.pdf
6
FMN Reduction Potentials
  • E -?G/F (F is faradays constant)
  • So if -?G favors products, E favor products
  • FMN has 2 reduction potentials
  • Oxidized Semiquione Eox/sq
  • Semiquinone Reduced Esq/rd
  • FMN binding to protein causes a shift in its
    reduction potentials
  • Eox/sq gets more
  • Esq/rd gets more
  • Sq intermediate is stabilized

7
Contributions to ?E
  • FMNApoflavodoxin Interactions
  • FMN has contacts with residues 10-15 (P binding
    loop), 56-62 (ß3/a3 loop), and 90-99 (ß4/a4 loop)

6
4
  • Hydrogen Bonding
  • Asp90 NH --- N1 and O2
  • Gln99 NH --- O2
  • Asp97 CO --- N3
  • Gly60 NH --- O4
  • Thr56 CO --- N1
  • Ile59 NH --- N5

3
2
5
1
8
Contributions to ?E
  • Electrostatic Interactions
  • Asn58
  • Ile59
  • Gly60
  • Tyr94
  • Asn97
  • Aromatic Stacking
  • Tyr94 face-face w/ isoalloxazine ring
  • Trp57 interacts with the phosphate

9
Objective of the Experiment
  • Explore the effects of specific H bond
    interactions and the electrostatic environment on
    FMN reduction potentials
  • Methods used
  • Site-directed mutagenesis create FMNFld
    mutants
  • UV-vis spec compare spectral properties of
    mutant vs. WT (has the environment changed?)
  • Fluorescence Determine dissociation constants
  • Circular Diochroism effect on overall protein
    structure
  • Photoreduction formation of Sq form of FMN
  • EPR compare amounts of Sq stabilized
  • ESEEM effect of residues on electron density
    distribution

10
Anabaena Fld Mutants
  • 5 mutants were made to modify polarity and H
    bonding network
  • Thr56Gly loss of H bond
  • Thr56Ser displacement of H bond
  • Asn58Cys more negatively charged
  • Asn58Lys add charge
  • Asn97Lys add charge
  • 3 mutants were made to change the electrostatic
    environment on the surface of the protein
  • Glu20Lys - neg. to pos. charge
  • Asp65Lys - neg. to pos. charge
  • Asp96Asn - neutralization

Negatively Charged Surface residues in red
11
Expression Levels
  • Expression levels of all mutants were similar to
    wild type
  • No major structural changes
  • CD data show no changes in secondary structure of
    WT and mutants
  • Thr56Gly lost a portion of its FMN during
    purification
  • Weak FMNprotein interactions in this mutant

12
Photoreduction
  • Reduction of oxidized Fld was initiated by
    reaction with a highly reductive dRfH
    (5-deazoriboflavin) radical.
  • Reactions were made anaerobic by evacuation and
    flushing with O2 free Ar
  • Reaction mixtures were irradiated with 150W
    light.
  • Absorption spectra taken after successive
    irradiation steps to measure concentrations of
    each redox state

13
Determination of Concentration and Reduction
Potentials
  • Measure potential of solution using a sat.
    calomel reference electrode and record absorbance
    spectra during successive irradiations
  • Determine sq from absorbance at 580nm ox
    Fldtotal sq during early photoreduction
    rd Fldtotal sq during late
    photoreduction
  • Determine midpoint potentials from the Nernst
    Equation E Em (0.059/n)log(ox/rd)

14
Reduction Potentials
Ox/Sq Glu20Lys, Thr56Gly, Thr56Ser
Ox/Sq WT, Asp65Lys, Asp96Asn
Sq/Rd Glu20Lys, Thr56Gly, Thr56Ser
Sq/Rd WT, Asp65Lys, Asp96Asn
Slope stays about the same, but both midpoint
potentials change for the mutants, esp. Asn58Lys
and Thr56Gly ?ESq/Rd -11 to 63 mV ?EOx/Sq
-23 to 19 mV Potentials tend to converge with
each other for the mutants
Ox/Sq Asn58Cys, Asn58Lys, Asn97Lys
Sq/Rd Asn58Cys, Asn58Lys, Asn97Lys
15
Reduction Potentials
  • Less Sq is stabilized in the mutants as reduction
    potentials converge

16
Absorption spectra of oxidized forms WT vs.
mutants
  • Extinction coefficients and maxima at 460nm is
    smaller for mutants and the shoulder at 480nm is
    lost in 2 mutants environment around the flavin
    has been modified

WT bold line Thr56Gly thin line
Thr56Ser broken thin line Asn58Cys dotted
thin line Asn58Lys broken bold line Asn97Lys
dotted bold line
17
Absorption spectra of semiquinone Fld WT vs.
mutant
  • Isosbestic point for mutants is different
  • Less sq stabilized in mutants, especially
    Thr56Gly and Asn58Lys

WT
Thr56Gly
Sq 580nm
Ox 480nm
Asn58Lys
18
UV-vis properties
19
EPR
  • EPR (Electron Paramagnetic Resonance) Method
    for detecting species with free radicals, similar
    to NMR
  • Apply continuous wave of magnetic field
  • Two possible electron spin orientations create
    two distinct energy levels
  • Resonance occurs when ?Ms1
  • Pass microwave radiation through resonating
    molecules and determine concentration from the
    absorbance

20
EPR
  • ?E h? gßB
  • where
  • ?E is the energy difference between the two spin
    states
  • h is Planck constant
  • v is the microwave frequency
  • g is the Zeeman splitting factor
  • ß is the Bohr magneton
  • B is the applied magnetic field.
  • Both WT and mutants gave same value for the
    Zeeman splitting factor g2.005 (data not shown)

21
EPR and ESEEM
  • ESEEM (Electron Spin-Echo Envelope Modulation)
    Variation of EPR using pulsed waves of magnetic
    field
  • An echo is created that cause nuclear spins to
    occur in nearby atoms.
  • Measure of echo vs. time gives information about
    electron distribution in a molecule.
  • Mutants show similar ESEEM data to WT (not shown)
  • EPR and ESEEM data show that the change in
    individual residues has no effect on the electron
    density distribution of FMN.

22
Effect of pH on Reduction potentials
  • Slopes
  • EOx/Sq
  • WT -51 ?
  • Thr56Gly -61 ?
  • Asn58Lys -65
  • ESq/Rd
  • WT -51 below pH 7, 0 above
  • Thr56Gly -33 ?
  • Asn58Lys -89 ?

?
Sq becomes more stable as pH increases moreso for
mutants than WT
23
Fluorescence Data
  • Binding of FMN to protein quenches the
    fluorescence by FMN.
  • WT Ox Fld has only fluoresces 5 as much as free
    FMN
  • All mutants are the same except
  • Asn58Lys 9
  • Thr56Gly 29
  • FMN in these mutants has more exposure to the
    external environment

24
Fluorescence DataDetermination of Dissociation
Constants
  • Begin with pure Ox FMN read fluorescence
  • Add protein and allow to reach equil. read
    again
  • Repeat successively
  • Determine Kd from this equation
  • F Ffinal Fd(dCF - CA Kd dCF)
  • (CA Kd dCF)2 4CAdCF1/2/2

25
Determining binding affinity profiles from Kds
  • Reduction potentials are related to binding
    affinities by this thermodynamic cycle.
  • Now that we have a relationship between the Es
    and Kd for Ox FMN we can calculate ?GOx.

?GSq and ?GRd can be calculated from ?GSq ?GOx
F(EOx/Sq EOx/Sqfree) ?GRd ?GOx F(EOx/Sq
ESq/Rd EOx/Sqfree ESq/Rdfree)
26
Binding Affinity Profiles
  • A
  • ? WT
  • ? Thr56Gly
  • ? Thr56Ser
  • ? Asn58Cys
  • Asn97Lys

B ? Glu20Lys Asp96Asn ? Asn58Lys ? Asp65Lys
27
What do these data tell us?
  • In general If electrostatic properties within 14
    ? away are modified, changes occur in both EOx/Sq
    and ESq/Rd.
  • Except Thr56Gly only ESq/Rd is changed
  • Small changes occur when the electrostatic
    environment 20 ? away is modified.

28
What do these data tell us?
  • More specifically
  • How the protein environment modulates ESq/Rd.
  • How it modulates EOx/Sq.
  • How pH effects both potentials
  • Role of specific residues on stability of
    proteinFMN complex.

29
Protein Environment Affects the ESq/Rd
  • N1 is usually not protonated in the hydroquinone
    so is less stable than the other forms because of
    the negatively charged environment.
  • So, removing negative charge or adding positive
    charge to this location stabilizes the
    hydroquinone (depending on location relative to
    the ring)
  • Asn58Lys (4 ? away) ?E 32 mV
  • Asn97Lys (5 ? away) ?E 18 mV
  • Asp96Asn (10 ? away) ?E 13 mV
  • Asp65Lys (13 ? away) ?E 16 mV
  • Glu20Lys (20 ? away) ?E 9 mV
  • Theoretical estimation -4 mV per negatively
    charged residue shift in ESq/Rd

30
Protein Environment Affects the ESq/Rd
  • Solvent accessibility lowers the potential
    (stabilizing the Sq state)
  • Thr56Gly (increases the internal cavity) ?E
    63 mV

20 ? cavity
44 ? and 16 ? cavities
31
Protein Environment Affects the EOx/Sq
  • Ox to Sq transition of WT Fld from other species
    (i.e. A. nidulans)
  • Sequence conservation between A. nidulans and
    Anabaena suggest it will do the same.
  • Previous study Ile59Lys makes the potential more
    negative (less stabilization of Sq)
  • Asn58Lys ?E -23 mV
  • Increase in conformational energy of Asp58-Ile59
  • And/or breakage of hydrophobic interactions
    between FMN and Asp 58

32
pH Affects the Reduction Potentials
  • Change in slopes of ESq/Rd andEOx/Sq vs. pH
    suggest protonation of residue(s) in the FMN
    environment (not of FMN itself) modulates the
    reduction potential.
  • Thr56Gly and Asp58Lys result in a shift of the
    pKa of the protein from 6 to gt8.
  • Structural changes caused by these mutations
    possible affect
  • Decrease in ESq/Rd vs. pH slope
  • Increase in ESq/Rd
  • Increase of pKa
  • Because solvent may enter the cavities.

33
Thr56Gly Has a Large Effect the ApoFldFMN
interaction
  • Highest increase in Kd (184-fold!)
  • Why???
  • Thr56 Interactions with FMN
  • H bond with two O atoms
  • Hydrophobic interactions with 7 atoms
  • H bond to Asp100 and Ala101 near FMN
  • Replace with Gly (very large increase in Kd)
  • Lose H bond and most other interactions
  • Make FMN more solvent accessible
  • Replace with Ser (very small increase in Kd)
  • Keep H bond and lose a few interactions
  • Little change in solvent accessibility

34
Asn97Lys Has a Smaller Effect on the ApoFldFMN
interaction
  • 3.2-fold increase in Kd
  • Why???
  • Asp97 interactions
  • H bond with N3 of FMN, Tyr94, Gln99, and 2 with
    Asp100
  • Hydrophobic interactions with 2 atoms of FMN
  • Replace with Lys
  • Break one H bond with Asp100 and lose hydrophobic
    interactions with FMN

35
Conclusion
  • Redox properties of FMN are modified by solvent
    accessibility to isoalloxazine ring, and
    hydrophobic and electrostatic properties of
    residues in the environment.
  • Specific examples have been presented

36
References
  • Nogués, et al. 2004. Role of Neighboring Side
    Chains in the Modulation of Flavin Reduction
    Potentials and in the Energetics of the
    FMNApoprotein Interaction in Anabaena
    Flavodoxin. Biochemistry 43 15111-21.
  • Hoover et al. 1999. Comparisons of Wild-type and
    Mutant Flavodoxins from Anacystis nidulans.
    Structural Determinants of the Redox Potentials.
    J. Mol. Bio. 294 725-43.
  • Berg, Tymoczko, and Stryer. 2002. Biochemistry
    5th ed. Ch 19 The light reactions of
    photosynthesis. 538-39
  • Electron Paramagnetic Resonance What is EPR?
    2000. http//www.chem.queensu.ca/eprnmr/EPR_summar
    y.htm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com