Flutter vs Native: Will Flutter Replace Native Apps In 2022?

1
Flutter vs Native Will Flutter Replace
Native Apps In 2022?
Weve grown accustomed to accessing everything
from our hands as our lives have become
increasingly entwined with technology. Whether
for our ?nances, employment, education,
information, gaming, or shopping, we ?rst go for
our phones.
2
2 Its no surprise that mobile apps are in high
demand, and mobile development teams are under
pressure to provide excellent products as soon
as possible. The problem with developing for iOS
and Android is that it is time-consuming.
Flutter offers a solution for this. A Flutter is
a UI software development kit primarily used for
producing applications for Android and iOS. It
is the technology of choice for the quickest time
to market. Despite the fact that Flutter is still
relatively new, it already has over 150,000
applications. Its usage has nearly doubled,
according to Statista surveys, rising from 23 in
2019 to 42 in 2022. Developing a mobile app with
native technology implies using technology and
techniques speci?c to a single platform. Flutter
is based on write once, run anywhere. That
means you simply have to write one set of code
and deliver it on every platform you desire
(Android, iOS, Linux, etc.). Flutters most
signi?cant advantage is its ease of development.
At the same time, it performs similarly to
native apps, and the apps look the same across
platforms.
3
Flutter vs Native development
3

• What exactly are Native technologies?
• Native application development creates an app
  speci?c to iOS, Android, or Windows, allowing it
  to fully utilize device features like the camera,
  accelerometer, compass, GPS, etc. App stores
  such as Google Play for Android and the App
  Store for iOS install native apps. Frameworks and
• programming languages that are widely used
  include
• Android Java, Android Studio and Kotlin
• iOS Objective-C, Xcode, and Swift
• Use cases
• GPS-based applications
• Rich-animation applications
• Applications for AR/VR
• Large data volume AI-triggered apps
• Native stand-alone applications

4
4 What exactly is Flutter?
Image source

• Flutter is a Google Dart-based open-source
  framework. As a UI toolkit, it
• allows developers to create cross-platform apps
  from a single codebase. On native hardware, it
  provides for creating expressive and ?exible user
• interfaces. A team of Google developers, as well
  as the broader ?utter community, support and
  contribute to the project.
• Use cases
• The skia rendering engine for high-performance
  apps
• Material design applications
• Plugins for advanced operating systems with basic
  logic
• High-level widgets with a ?exible user interface
• Mobile MVP applications

5

• 5
• Want to learn more about Flutter app development?
  Read this The Only
• Flutter App Development Guide Youll Ever Need
• Flutter vs Native app development Code
  maintenance
• Native technologies
• Because you will be creating your app for speci?c
  platforms,
• maintaining a native application is
  time-consuming and costly.
• The explanation is simple maintaining two
  codebases necessitates signi?cant effort, and
  developers must discover issues and problems for
  each platform regularly to release distinct
  upgrades.
• In addition, the cost of maintenance rises in
  lockstep with the number of supported OS
  devices.
• Flutter
• Flutter applications are simple to maintain
  because they share a single
• codebase.
• The codes simplicity aids developers in
  identifying problems, locating external tools,
  and supporting third-party libraries.
• In addition, Flutters stateful Hot Reloading
  technology quickly addresses issues.
• Compared to other native frameworks, the time it
  takes to release
• high-quality updates and make instantaneous
  changes to the program is

6
6 less. This degree of adaptability contributes
to the companys overall stability. Flutter vs
Native app development Native features and
integration capacities
Image source

• Native technologies
• The software design pattern and application
  performance in?uence the
• integration possibilities of iOS and Android via
  their respective frameworks and programming
  languages.
• To summarize, most native frameworks, including
  Swift, which are utilized to develop the iOS
  app, offer increased security and expressive
  developments in capabilities, as well as quick
  integration possibilities.

7

• 7
• Consider the Android programming language Kotlin
  and Java. Both
• frameworks provide seamless integration using
  their default runtime classes or Intellij
  environment.
• Flutter
• Integration of unique features from third-party
  libraries or plugins is
• simple with Flutter, but it may be deemed complex
  by developers unfamiliar with Darts
  capabilities.
• Several add-on plugins like CocoaPods, Android
  Archive (AAR), and others are required to
  integrate speci?c iOS and Android functions.
• On the other hand, the Flutter engine has certain
  constraints when integrating native modules with
  Android Studios Xcode.
• Its documentation contains step-by-step
  directions for overcoming these challenges and
  successfully integrating them with iOS and
  Android.
• It may lengthen the time to market, although this
  is generally neglected in favor of the cost
  savings associated with Flutter.
• It is now possible to run Flutter on all recent
  versions of iOS, including iOS 14, though it has
  limits, and the functionality may change with
  each update.

8

• 8
• Flutter vs Native app development Application
  performance
• Native technologies
• Even without extra library packages, iOS and
  Android apps execute
• admirably because of native performance
  capabilities.
• In spite of Core Animations, native apps built
  with native technologies can run at 60 FPS and
  120 FPS.
• Typically, native GPU technologies load between
  30 and 45 of total GPU performance over RAM.
• Native technologies can also require up to 118
  MiB of device RAM if your application is very
  large due to native performance.
• In the long run, unless you choose speci?c
  external-SDK alternatives to boost speed with
  low memory utilization, it may overload the
  users devices.
• Flutter
• Flutter does not need a bridge between native
  modules because native
• components are available by default.
• The hello world app usually runs at 60 frames
  per second, requiring less than 16 milliseconds
  to render each frame on a speci?c device.
• Flutter also uses the Skia graphics package,
  which allows the user interface to be redrawn
  every time the application view changes.

9

• 9
• Flutter now runs smoothly at 60 frames per
  second. It can currently work at 120 frames per
  second.
• Flutter vs Native app development Speed and cost
  of development

Image source

• Native technologies
• The time it takes to develop native mobile
  applications varies depending
• on your budget, timeframe, and scaling ability.
• Native technology allows for the creation of
  small-scale and
• enterprise-level apps that match iOS and Android
  users needs. So either the development team
  will be enormous, or two separate teams for iOS
  and Android would be required.

10

• 10
• Due to the requirement for two scripts for two
  separate platforms
• that have independent functionalities, the
  investment budget for your project will
  increase.
• In other words, native technologies follow the
  write twice, run twice principle.
• Flutter
• Flutter embraces the write once, run anywhere
  philosophy, allowing
• developers to write code once and execute it on
  two separate platforms.
• Due to lower development costs, the development
  time will be shortened substantially.
• Big players like Alibaba, BMW, Watermaniac, and
  PostMuse, among others, have built their apps
  using Flutter in as few as ?ve developers.
• With the low cost of training, even a new
  developer can quickly learn to create mobile
  apps, eliminating the need to hire numerous
  experienced developers.
• Consider these points before choosing Flutter or
  the Native app
• Flutter app creation is inexpensive. It costs
  less than native application development, making
  it more affordable for SMEs and other small
• businesses.

11

• 11
• Simultaneously, it eliminates the need for
  separate platform
• development and provides an organization with a
  single application that can be easily used
  across several platforms.
• Flutter framework has many features and
  possibilities, so its a good option, but its
  not perfect yet. OpenGL, Maps, Video
  Functionality, and Accessibility Support are
  among the features and support that Flutter
  lacks. Despite this, there are still gaps that
  need to be ?lled.
• Flutters memory use is almost identical to
  native, although it is still heavier on the CPU.
• Flutter uses CPU, whereas iOS Native uses GPU.
• All things considered, the Flutter framework
  would be an excellent alternative for app
  development for ?rms looking to create a
  native-like app. Although cross-platform
  frameworks frequently appear on the market,
  native applications remain the industrys
  favorite. Flutter is an excellent choice for
• enterprises that want to build a mobile
  application.

Is Flutter going to supplant native app
development? In a lifetime, many frameworks will
come and go. Flutter has already made a name for
itself in mobile app development. In
cross-platform app
12
12 development, its growth rate has eclipsed its
nearest competition, the React-Native framework.
Does this imply that Flutter technology will
mostly replace native app development? Sounds
plausible. Native development in
Java/Kotlin/Swift will undoubtedly continue, but
you should anticipate app migration and possibly
signi?cant market adjustments. Furthermore,
Flutter has already established itself as the
best user interface design framework currently
accessible. It has various unique design tools
and widgets that arent available in native
Android app development. And thanks to Googles
extensive documentation and simple command-line
interface, Flutter makes the setup process much
more manageable. These features tell analysts
that Flutter has a vast potential to displace
Java in the mobile app development space. In
2022 and beyond, dont miss the chance to
develop cross-platform apps with
Flutter. Conclusion There will be a struggle
between native and cross-platform software for
many years to come. In the future, we will need
a cross-platform solution with native app
development capabilities. As a result, the two
are in a heated ?ght.
13
13 The industry will continue to grow and look
for holes to ?ll to create a perfect blend of
both platforms that can meet the demand while
integrating the advantages of both platforms
with e?ciency and effectiveness. Cross-platform
skills in development will build a solid basis
for future advances with ongoing efforts and
substantial modi?cations.