What are the advantages of Manual QA Testing over Automation Testing? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

What are the advantages of Manual QA Testing over Automation Testing?

Description:

Manual QA Testing Advantages over the Automation Testing with all the difference between MAnual and Automation Testing – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:183

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What are the advantages of Manual QA Testing over Automation Testing?


1
What are the advantages of Manual Testing over
Automation?
2
Software Testing Overview
When the software programs are designed, it is
necessary to carry out a process of testing which
helps identify any bugs or errors that occurred
during the development procedure.
3
Manual Software Testing
  • Manual testing services need an expert tester to
    accomplish the testing process
  • The tester plays a function of the end user and
    confirms if all the features of the application
    are working in order or not.
  • The tester plays a function of the end user and
  • confirms if all the features of the application
    are
  • working in order or not.

4
Automatic Software Testing
  • The automated testing accomplishes the testing
    process with the help of the automated tools and
    It minimizes the efforts of the manual testers by
    implementing the minimum set of scripts.
  • Automated testing tools can complete the
    following steps with ease

5
Manual Testing Over Automation Testing
  • Even with the advent of the automated testing,
    manual testing holds a very important place in
    most of the organizations as it doesnt need any
    preparation and can be run without any
    constrictions.
  • The automation process has been dominating the
    manual process of testing since its introduction,
    but manual testing has never lost its place in an
    organization as it has ample benefits

6
Manual Testing Over Automation Testing
  • User Interface and User Experience
  • Automated testing works according to the scripts
    loaded with the tools and fails to recognize
    anything out of the context. has a robotic
    approach and fails to recognize the faults
    related to the GUIs and user experiences.
  • User Interface and User Experience testing are
    not possible
  • when automated testing is concerned. In Manual QA
    Testing,
  • testers use their expertise to detect the errors
    in the
  • programs while execute.
  • And runs the software from the user point of
    view.

7
Manual Testing Over Automation Testing
  • Accuracy
  • It has been observed that the modules tend to
    change during runtime as a part of their behavior
    or the modification. The Accuracy is very
    important.

Automation Testing Manual Testing
While testing the case automatically, the tester needs to set the test cases according to the modifications, align them with the automated tool, and then the tests can be run. While in manual testing, the testers can directly initiate the testing process, without any hectic process.
8
Manual Testing Over Automation Testing
  • It is not possible to execute the Ad-hoc testing
    with automated testing.
  • When an application is in the regression phase,
    the automated testing can be accomplished,
    whereas during the initial stage of the
    development, only manual testing can be
    performed.
  • If any area of the automation test fails, the
    test cant be executed in the rest of the areas.
    However, manual testing can be accomplished in
    any area even if the previous tests fail.
  • The manual testing can be accomplished on the
    customized modules whereas the automated tests
    can be run exclusively on the entire program.

9
Manual Testing Over Automation Testing
Automation Testing Manual Testing
If the automation script is infused with errors, the resultant software will also be filled with errors, without the knowledge of the testers. Whereas the manual testing follows a critical-path functionality that makes sure the program is free of any errors from the user point of view.
The initial investment of the automated testing is higher The initial investment of the Manual testing is Lower
The framework and the development of the script is a lengthy process The framework and the development of the script is a lengthy process
10
Conclusion
  • It is evident from the above-mentioned steps
    that the manual testing is a flexible process
    that can be executed any time and during any
    phase, whereas the automated testing is entwined
    with certain restrictions.
  • Though the manual testing services need expert
    professional to accomplish the activity, it is
    very helpful in understanding the real-time
    errors.
  • Even if the process of automation can be carried
    out in the background while the testers can
    engage themselves in the development of the
    software program, manual testing is the authentic
    way to justify the reason behind the testing
    procedure.

Thank You!
11
Contact Us
info_at_nexsoftsys.com
www.nexsoftsys.com
India, USA
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com