Dissertation on US AND SAUDI ARABIAN COUNTER TERRORISM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Dissertation on US AND SAUDI ARABIAN COUNTER TERRORISM

Description:

this is Dissertation on US AND SAUDI ARABIAN COUNTER TERRORISM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dissertation on US AND SAUDI ARABIAN COUNTER TERRORISM


1
DISSERTATION
  • US AND SAUDI ARABIAN COUNTER TERRORISM POLICY A
    COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

2
US-SAUDI COUNTER TERRORISM
3
INTRODUCTION
  • Counter terrorism policies are the methods and
    rules adopted by various security agencies to
    tackle the terrorism problem.
  • Counter terrorism policies and regulations are
    developed jointly by authorities like department
    of home land security in USA.
  • In Saudi Arabia they are developed ministry of
    internal affairs and government of Saudi Arabia.

4
INTRODUCTION
  • Basic motive and goal of terrorism is to create
    fear in the mind of citizens of a society by
    using various form of violent activities.
  • Anti terrorism and counter terrorism both are
    working against any form of terrorism.
  • Most of the terrorist groups are based on
    religious fanatics, cross border conflicts,
    conflicts and animosity based on differences in
    religion, race and color.

5
STRUCTURE OF REPORT AND LIKELY CHAPTERS
  • INTRODUCTION
  • AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
  • LITERATURE REVIEW
  • RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
  • DATA ANALYSIS
  • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION
  • REFERENCES
  • (all these headings are title of chapters each
    chapter would have several sub headings)

6
AIM AND OBJECTIVES
  • This research is aiming to analyse various
    aspects of counter terrorism policies and do a
    comparative analysis.
  • Objective of this research is to identify key
    points of both country's counter terrorism
    policies and then conduct a critical comparative
    analysis which will provide new insights in
    subject matter.

7
JUSTIFICATION AND REASON
  • This topic is very interesting as a title for
    dissertation because lately terrorism has been a
    very important issue for various governments of
    world.
  • Saudi Arabia as a country is very uniquely
    positioned in countering terrorism.
  • There are certain local condition involved with
    Saudi Arabia which makes their counter terrorism
    policy superior and more effective.
  • This title is very contemporary in nature and
    provides a complete overview of the counter
    terrorism policy of both countries.

8
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
  • what are the salient features of counter
    terrorism policies of country of Saudi Arabia and
    USA?
  • How are both policies different?
  • How can we explain both policies and compare them
    analytically.

9
LITERATURE OVERVIEW
  • Terrorism can be more appropriately defined as
    means and mechanism to create an environment of
    fear and paranoia.
  • a terrorist group remains dominant and formidable
    in nature by installing fear in mind of people.
  • It uses violent explosions, threatening covert
    attacks on innocent people and aggressive
    agitation against governments and establishments.

10
LITERATURE OVERVIEW (CONTD.)
  • counter terrorism is not a new phenomenon but
    after world trade center attack in New York a
    whole new meaning of counter terrorism has
    evolved.
  • A counter terrorism policy is developed after a
    long analysis and understanding of the current
    and future requirements of the security
  • Counter terrorism does not confines itself to the
    military and weapon related tactics.

11
LITERATURE OVERVIEW (CONTD.)
  • measures like political pressure economic
    tactics to control and curb the budding terrorist
    activities are also used in a holistic counter
    terrorism policy.
  • International organizations like United Nations,
    NATO, WTO creates a collective pressure on
    countries to curb terrorism.
  • Intelligence services and spy agencies also play
    a very deterministic role in counter terrorism
    activities.

12
LITERATURE OVERVIEW (CONTD.)
  • Saudi Arabia is an Islamic country which follows
    the law of Islamic religion and constitution to
    the letter.
  • Saudi Arabia as a country is one of the most
    powerful and respected country in Middle East.
  • They are ideally suited to became a long term
    strategic partner of USA for countering terrorism

13
LITERATURE OVERVIEW (CONTD.)
  • Saudi Arabias counter terrorism policy is
    developed in a very meticulous way where minor
    details are considered.
  • USA has made one policy of counter terrorism
    which is being applied in all situations with
    minor changes.
  • Saudi Arabias policy is drafted keeping what is
    the current and future requirements of the
    country in considerations.

14
CHALLENGES AND PRELIMINARY ARGUEMENTS
  • Saudi Arabias counter terrorism policy is
    considered as a slow impacting policy which will
    be argued by some academicians who will challenge
    its effectiveness.
  • One of the biggest challenges in choosing a topic
    like counter terrorism is restriction in
    accessing data and refusal of concerned persons
    in answering the questions.
  • This topic is of international importance and
    very sensitive in nature making it a very
    interesting as well as challenging topic.

15
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN USA AND SAUDIARABIAS THREAT
  • There is a very contrasting difference between
    threat types and its level in USA and Saudi
    Arabia.
  • USAS threat is basically from outside the border
    of country while in Saudi Arabia there is a very
    real possibility of threat originating from
    inside the borders.
  • Terrorist groups will rarely found a sympathizing
    organization in USA but in Saudi Arabia there
    might be certain group of people who sympathizes
    with the terrorists cause thus creating an
    internal threat.

16
SOVEREIGNTY OF COUNTRIES
  • USA and Saudi Arabia are both sovereign
    countries but they have different forms of
    authority over their geographical countries.
  • USA has a more democratic establishment and their
    final authority is president of the country but
    congress of parliament governs president and his
    decisions as well
  • In Saudi Arabia King of the country is the
    highest authority to take decision in such
    matter.
  • Both the countries have different form of
    governments and different perception of
    sovereignty but on counter terrorism they have
    common goals in their mind.
  • Sovereignty exclusion includes territorial
    integrity and a sovereign technically means the
    supreme decision making and in both countries
    structure of this authority is different which
    makes slight issues with compatibility.

17
CULTURAL DIFFERENCES IN BOTH COUNTRIES
  • USA and Saudi Arabia as a nation and community
    are very different from each other culturally.
  • USAS culture and society is considered to be
    slightly open and liberal.
  • Saudis culture and community is more
    conservative.
  • This cultural difference occasionally creates
    obstacles in proper communication and cooperation
    between both countries.

18
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
  • This section will include the aims and objective
    of research research design limitations scope
    of research etc.
  • research will be secondary in nature and will be
    done as a qualitative research.
  • Data collected from literature review will be
    sorted and analyzed on the basis of research
    questions.
  • Analysis will provide insightful recommendations
    and solutions.

19
RESEARCH DESIGN
  • The research is designed as a secondary research.
  • reason for choosing such an approach for study is
    the research aims and objectives which requires
    comparative analysis.
  • It would be very difficult to gain sufficient
    amount of primary data for such a research.
  • In secondary research researcher will conduct an
    in depth literature review of the subject matter.

20
DATA ANALYSIS
  • Data will be collected from various reliable
    sources.
  • Resources like databases university library
    resources previous researches articles books
    journals and government publications will be
    used.
  • on the basis of this data analysis recommendation
    and solution will be provided.
  • Conclusion and recommendations will justify the
    research questions and research aim in a
    satisfactory manner.

21
LIMITATIONS OF RESEARCH
  • This research is an academic exercise which is
    done by students at university level.
  • there are many limitations like time constraints
    resource constraints denied access to various
    data.
  • Subjectivity and biases in the research is a
    phenomenon which generally incorporates
  • Researcher will use all methods to keep the
    subjectivity incorporation to a non significant
    level.

22
RELIABILITY AND CREDIBILITY
  • All precautions will be taken to ensure that data
    collected is objective reliable valid and
    credible in nature.
  • Data will be collected from only authentic and
    reliable resources
  • Before analysis data will be sorted and any data
    which is redundant or invalidated will be
    removed.

23
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
  • This section will fulfill the aim and objective
    of the research by answering the research
    question.
  • Recommendations are made on the basis of a in
    depth literature review and data analysis.
  • It will provide salient features of comparative
    analysis in a logical manner
  • Recommendations for future will be made

24
REFERENCES
  • Feiler, Gil (2007) The Globalization of Terror
    Funding. Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic
    Studies, Bar-Ilan University. p. 29. Mideast
    Security and Policy Studies No. 74 Retrieved
    2007-11-14
  • Buurman, J., S. Zhang, et al. (2009) "Reducing
    Risk Through Real Options In Systems Design The
    Case Of Architecting A Maritime Domain Protection
    System.1" Risk Analysis 29(3) 366-379.
  • Stathis N. Kalyvas (2004). "The Paradox of
    Terrorism in Civil Wars" (PDF). Journal of Ethics
    8 (1) 97138
  • Nagl, John A. Petraeus, David H. Amos, James
    F. Sewall, Sarah (2006) Field Manual 3-24
    Counterinsurgency. US Department of the Army
  • Pape, Robert A. (2005). Dying to Win The
    Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. Random
    House. pp. 237250.

25
REFERENCES (CONTD.)
  • Marc Sageman (2004), Understanding Terror
    Networks University of Pennsylvania Press,
    Philadelphia, PA
  • Ariel Merari (1993) "Terrorism as a Strategy in
    Insurgency," Terrorism and Political Violence,
    Vol. 5, No. 4 pp. 213251.
  • James F. Pastor, (2009) "Terrorism and Public
    Safety PolicingImplications for the Obama
    Presidency" Taylor Francis
  • Shibley Telhami (2004) "Manipulating U.S.
    Elections Is Not an Al-Qaeda Goal,"
  • Daily Star, Retrieved on 1.03.2012
  • USA (2011) counter terrorism policy of USA White
    house Publications available on
    http//www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/coun
    terterrorism_strategy.pdf retrieved on
    05.03.2012.
  • Dr. Mohammad S. Al-Bishr (2005) SAUDIS AND TERROR
    Cross-Cultural Views Ghainaa Publications
    Riyadh p. 2-321

26
OZ Assignment help E-mail support_at_locusrags.com
Website http//www.ozassignmenthelp.com.au/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com