ASH EDU 675 Week 4 Assignment Formative Evaluation Interpretation NEW - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Loading...

PPT – ASH EDU 675 Week 4 Assignment Formative Evaluation Interpretation NEW PowerPoint presentation | free to download - id: 837a6c-NGEzZ



Loading


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation
Title:

ASH EDU 675 Week 4 Assignment Formative Evaluation Interpretation NEW

Description:

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at   more classes visit – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:11

less

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ASH EDU 675 Week 4 Assignment Formative Evaluation Interpretation NEW


1
ASH EDU 675 Week 4 Assignment Formative
Evaluation Interpretation NEW Check this A
tutorial guideline at http//www.assignmentcloud
.com/edu-675-new/edu-675-week-4-assignment-formati
ve-evaluation-interpretation-new For more
classes visithttp//www.assignmentcloud.comForma
tive Evaluation - InterpretationIn EDU671, you
identified the type of data, the frequency of
collection, tools and have also explored topics
related to ethical consideration of this
information. You are in the process of collecting
data for your action research in the field at
this time.Be reminded that youre the approved
Action Research Informed Consent allows your
implementation of this action research
intervention or innovation in a specialized
setting as follows    Those currently employed
in a classroom setting.    Those currently
employed in a non-classroom or educational
setting.    Those not employed but implementing
the intervention or innovation with family
members, yourself, or your own children.You are
also in the final week of your action research
intervention. Through this process, your
experience reinforces action research as being
cyclical (Buczynski Hansen, 2014 Mills, 2014)
and for the best outcome we must engage in
critical reflection of the data (Volante
Beckett, 2011).
2
Vital to the process of collecting data is the
continual alignment to your research question(s).
Equally important is how you will systematically
collect multiple sources of data and present the
finding to arise at comprehensive conclusions at
the termination of your study. The quality of
your data analysis is a strong predictor of the
ease with which you can manage the data but how
you can develop sound findings at the end of your
study. Consider How will you triangulate this
information? How will you continue to build upon
this information in order to make sense and
correlate your data to your outcomes?The focus
of this assignment is to reflect on the data and
to prepare for how to analyze in order to answer
the research question. We want to answer the
question of So what? (Mills, 2014, p.132) This
is a critical stage of your action research! In
this assignment, you evaluate the main themes
emerging from your data thus far and how they are
or are not supporting your research questions.
For example, depending on what you are seeing in
the data, you may have assessed that your
research question should have been stated in a
slightly different manner in order to more
authentically capture the specific data. Or,
perhaps the data tells you that one of your
questions was irrelevant or that an additional
question with a slightly different focus should
have been asked.Construct your assignment to
meet the content and written communication
expectations below.Content Expectations  
 Themes (2 points) Describe the themes emerging
from the data collection.    Personal
Experiences (2 points) Analyze how the
preliminary findings relate to your personal
experiences using specific examples.  
 Implications. (3 points) Describe the
implications of your data that can be used to
answer your research question(s).Written
Communication Expectations    Page Requirement
(.5 points) Three-to-four pages, not including
title, references, and appendix pages.    APA
Formatting (.5 points) Use APA formatting
consistently throughout the assignment.  
 Syntax and Mechanics (.5 points) Display
meticulous comprehension and organization of
syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and
grammar.    Source Requirement (.5 points) Use
no less than two scholarly sources in addition to
the Buczynski and Hansen (2014) and Mills (2009)
textbooks, providing compelling evidence to
support ideas, and if applicable, reference to
original project if enhancement of existing
project occurred. All sources on the reference
page need to be used and cited correctly within
the body of the assignment.Next Steps Review
and Submit the Assignment
About PowerShow.com