DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 3 DQ 2 Living in Our State of Nature - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 3 DQ 2 Living in Our State of Nature

Description:

  – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:4

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 3 DQ 2 Living in Our State of Nature


1
DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 3 DQ 2 Living in Our State of
Nature
  • Check this A tutorial guideline at
  •  
  • http//www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc
    -445-week-3-dq-2-living-in-our-state-of-nature
  •  
  • For more classes visit
  • http//www.assignmentcloud.com
  • ETHC 445 Week 3 DQ 2 Living in Our State of
    Nature
  • Social Contract theorists say that morality
    consists of a set of rules governing how people
    should treat one another that rational beings
    will agree to accept for their mutual benefit, on
    the condition that others agree to follow these
    rules as well.
  • Hobbes runs the logic like this in the form of a
    logical syllogism
  • 1) We are all self-interested,

2
  • 2) Each of us needs to have a peaceful and
    cooperative social order to pursue our interests,
  • 3) We need moral rules in order to establish and
    maintain a cooperative social order,
  • Therefore, self-interest motivates us to
    establish moral rules.
  • Thomas Hobbes looked to the past to observe a
    primitive State of Nature in which there is no
    such thing as morality, and that this
    self-interested human nature was "nasty, brutish,
    and short" -- a kind of perpetual state of
    warfare
  • John Locke disagreed, and set forth the view that
    the state exists to preserve the natural rights
    of its citizens. When governments fail in that
    task, citizens have the rightand sometimes the
    dutyto withdraw their support and even to rebel.
    Listen to Locke's audio on the lecture tab and
    read his lecturette to be able to answer this
    thread.
  • Locke addressed Hobbes's claim that the state of
    nature was the state of war, though he attribute
    this claim to "some men" not to Hobbes. He
    refuted it by pointing to existing and real
    historical examples of people in a state of
    nature. For this purpose he regarded any people
    who are not subject to a common judge to resolve
    disputes, people who may legitimately take action
    to themselves punish wrong doers, as in a state
    of nature.

3
  • Which philosophy do you espouse?
  • In coming to grips with the two and considering
    your experience of society as it is today, think
    out loud about what you experiences as the State
    of Nature, and tell us what you would be willing
    to give up in exchange for civil order and
    personal security?
  • You might consider what you have already given up
    in exchange for security as well as what might be
    required in coming days.
  •  
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com