MCA revisits Share Capital and Debenture Rules, 2014 favourably - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

MCA revisits Share Capital and Debenture Rules, 2014 favourably

Description:

With almost 2.5 years elapsed after enforcing several provisions of Companies Act, 2013 (Act, 2013) the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) is continuously revisiting and revamping the rules issued thereunder in order to align with policy initiatives or as a corrective measure in response to practical difficulties faced by corporate. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MCA revisits Share Capital and Debenture Rules, 2014 favourably


1
Customer Care No. 91-11-45562222
MCA revisits Share Capital and Debenture Rules,
2014 favourably
www.taxmann.com
2
  • 1. Introduction
  • With almost 2.5 years elapsed after enforcing
    several provisions of Companies Act, 2013 (Act,
    2013) the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) is
    continuously revisiting and revamping the rules
    issued thereunder in order to align with policy
    initiatives or as a corrective measure in
    response to practical difficulties faced by
    corporate.
  • The latest amendment by MCA has been vide the
    Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Third
    Amendment Rules, 2016 (Amendment Rules). In this
    article we have analyzed the amendments by MCA.
  • 2. Companies in default eligible to issue shares
    with differential rights after cooling-off period
  • Rule 4(1) (g) of the Companies (Share Capital and
    Debentures) Rules, 2014 (Rules, 2014) expressly
    prohibits companies in default of payment of the
    dividend on preference shares or repayment of any
    tem loan from a public financial institution or
    State level financial institution or scheduled
    Bank that has become repayable or interest
    payable thereon or dues with respect to statutory
    payments relating to its employees to any
    authority or default in crediting the amount in
    Investor Education and Protection Fund to the
    Central Government from issuing equity shares
    with differential voting rights.

Customer Care No. 91-11-45562222
www.taxmann.com
3
  • The amendment to Rule 4(1)(g) provides for
    a cooling-off period of 5 years in case if the
    default is made good by the company i.e. a
    company is permitted to issue such equity shares
    with differential voting rights upon expiry of 5
    years from which such default was made good. A
    complete prohibition throughout for companies in
    default under the said rule to issue equity
    shares with differential voting rights is now
    relaxed significantly with the grant of the
    cooling-off period.
  • 3. Relaxation to Start-ups in issuing Sweat
    equity shares ESOPs
  • Rule 8(4) of Rules, 2014 restricts companies from
    issuing sweat equity shares in excess of 25 of
    the paid up capital at any time and also limits
    the issuance of sweat equity shares per year to
    15 of the paid up capital or issue value of Rs.5
    crores whichever is higher.
  • The amendment expressly allows notified Start-ups
    to issue sweat equity shares not exceeding50 of
    its paid up capital up to 5 years from the date
    of its incorporation or registration.However, the
    yearly limits of 15 of paid up capital or Rs.5
    crores whichever is higher has to be complied
    with.
  • Further, in case of ESOPs, Rule 12 of Rules, 2014
    read with Section 62 (1)(b) of Act, 2013
    regulates the issuance of ESOPs by companies. The
    question of eligibility is well settled by the
    below Explanation provided under Rule 12(1) for
    the term 'Employee' as mentioned in Section
    62(1)(b)



Customer Care No. 91-11-45562222
www.taxmann.com
4
  • Explanation
  • For the purposes of clause (b) of sub-section (1)
    of section 62 and this rule ''Employee'' means-
  • (a) a permanent employee of the company who has
    been working in India or outside India or
  • (b) a director of the company, whether a whole
    time director or not but excluding an independent
    director or
  • (c) an employee as defined in clauses (a) or (b)
    of a subsidiary, in India or outside India, or of
    a holding company of the company but does not
    include-
  • i. an employee who is a promoter or a person
    belonging to the promoter group or
  • ii. a director who either himself or through his
    relative or through any body corporate, directly
    or indirectly, holds more than ten percent of the
    outstanding equity shares of the company.
  • The sub-clauses (i) and (ii) of clause (c)
    provides for the exclusion of promoter or a
    person belonging to the promoter group and a
    director holding more than 10 of outstanding
    equity shares directly or indirectly through his
    relative or through any body corporate from the
    ambit of the term 'Employees' while issuing
    ESOPs.
  • The amendment exempts the application of the
    above sub-clauses (i) and (ii) for the notified
    Start-ups upto5 years from the date of
    incorporation or registration.

www.taxmann.com
Customer Care No. 91-11-45562222
5
  • To read more, please click here

Customer Care No. 91-11-45562222
www.taxmann.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com