PED 212 expert tutor/ uophelp - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

PED 212 expert tutor/ uophelp

Description:

For more course tutorials visit www.uophelp.com PED 212 Week 1 DQ 1 Current Issues PED 212 Week 1 DQ 2 Critical Thinking PED 212 Week 2 DQ 1 Motor Skills PED 212 Week 2 DQ 2 Complex Skills PED 212 Week 2 Fundamental Skill Lesson Plan PED 212 Week 3 Children’s Health Awareness Presentation PED 212 Week 3 DQ 1 Class Environments PED 212 Week 3 DQ 2 Assessment PED 212 Week 4 DQ 1 The Four S’s PED 212 Week 4 DQ 2 Critical Thinking PED 212 Week 5 DQ 1 Play vs. Sports PED 212 Week 5 DQ 2 Professional Associations PED 212 Week 5 Final Paper – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:13

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PED 212 expert tutor/ uophelp


1
PHI 103 expert tutor
  • For more course tutorials visit
  • www.uophelp.com

2
PHI 103 expert tutor
  • PHI 103 Entire Course (Ash Course)
  • PHI 103 Week 1 DQ 1
  • PHI 103 Week 1 DQ 1 (Consider an argument you
    have recently)PHI 103 Week 1 DQ 2 (Logic can do
    a great deal in helping us understand our
    arguments)PHI 103 Week 1 QuizPHI 103 Week 2 DQ
    1 (Construct a deductive argument)PHI 103 Week 2
    DQ 2 (Construct an inductive argument)PHI 103
    Week 2 Assignment Final Paper Outline Pro Choice
    (Legalized Abortion)PHI 103 Week 2 QuizPHI 103
    Week 3 DQ 1 (Considering the fallacies discussed
    in Chapter Four)PHI 103 Week 3 DQ 2 (One rich
  • DQ 1
  • Consider an argument you have recently had with a
    friend, family member, manager, co-worker, or
    someone else. Identify the topic of the argument
    and present that argument in premise-conclusion
    form, identifying both the premises and
    conclusion.
  •  

3
PHI 103 expert tutor
  • PHI 103 Week 1 DQ 2
  • PHI 103 Week 1 Quiz (Ash Course)
  • DQ 2
  •  
  • Logic can do a great deal in helping us
    understand our arguments. Explain what advantages
    we obtain by studying logic in terms of improving
    our reasoning. Consider a debate over whether
    prayer should be allowed in public schools.
    Explain what logic can and cannot do. In other
    words, what kinds of questions and topics are not
  • 1. Question Which of these could
    be seen as a premise in an argument?
  • 2. Question A valid deductive
    argument, the premises of which are accepted as
    true, shows
  • 3. Question "You didn't like that
    book so you probably don't like to read" is

4
PHI 103 expert tutor
  • PHI 103 Week 2 Assignment Final Paper Outline Pro
    Choice (Legalized Abortion) (Ash Course)
  • PHI 103 Week 2 DQ 1
  • Final Paper Outline. Review the Final Paper
    instructions in Week 5 of the onlinecourse or in
    the Components of Course Evaluation section of
    this guide.
  • Then, visit the Ashford Writing Center (located
    in the Learning Resources tab in the left
    navigation bar).
  • The outline must containa Introduction with
    thesis statement.
  • At least five body paragraphs, using the provided
    model. Conclusion. Reference page containing at
    least three
  • DQ 1
  • Construct a deductive argument that is valid but
    not sound. Then, construct a valid deductive
    argument that is sound. Be sure to put the
    argument in premise-conclusion form.
  •  

5
PHI 103 expert tutor
  • PHI 103 Week 2 DQ 2
  • PHI 103 Week 2 Quiz (Ash Course)
  • DQ 2
  • Construct an inductive argument for a specific
    conclusion. Then, explain what you might do to
    make this inductive argument stronger, either by
    revising the premises or by revising the
    conclusion.
  •  
  • 1. Question "10 is less than
    100 100 is less than 1,000 consequently, 10 is
    less than 1,000" is an example of a
  • 2. Question One way to make an
    inductive argument stronger is to
  • 3. Question All sound arguments
    are valid, but not all valid arguments are sound.
    This means
  • 4. Question Inductive arguments
    should never be characterized as
  • 5. Question Inductive arguments
    are evaluated in terms of
  • 6. Question A valid argument

6
PHI 103 expert tutor
  • PHI 103 Week 3 Assignment Stereotype Paper (Ash
    Course)
  • PHI 103 Week 3 DQ 1
  • PHI 103 Week 3 Assignment Stereotype Paper
  • Stereotype Paper.
  • Read Stereotyping Has Lasting Negative Impact
    Prejudice has lingering effects,study shows and
    watch How Pre-existing Beliefs Distort Logical
    Reasoning.
  • Discuss three stereotypes
  • DQ 1
  • Considering the fallacies discussed in Chapter
    Four of An Introduction to Logic, construct three
    different arguments that display distinct
    fallacies. Give an explanation of why each makes
    a mistake in drawing the conclusion it does.
    Review your classmates examples and see if they,
    in fact, commit the fallacy identified.

7
PHI 103 expert tutor
  • PHI 103 Week 3 DQ 2
  • PHI 103 Week 3 Quiz (Ash Course)
  • DQ 2
  • One rich source of fallacies is the media
    television, radio, magazines, and the Internet
    (including, of course, commercials.) Identify two
    distinct fallacies you see committed in the
    media. Do you think it is more likely that you
    will not be fooled by these fallacies having
    studied logic? What do you think those presenting
    these arguments assume about the logical skills
    of their viewers? Is this a good or
  • . Question "China uses too much
    oil. So they shouldn't develop their industry"
    may commit which fallacy?
  • 2. Question "Julie started
    carrying a rabbit's foot, then she won the
    lottery. The rabbit's foot must have caused her
    to win the lottery" commits a(n)
  • 3. Question A person who is
    shown his or her argument commits a fallacy should

8
PHI 103 expert tutor
  • PHI 103 Week 4 Critical Thinking Quiz (Ash Course)
  • PHI 103 Week 4 DQ 1
  • . Question Mrs.Orlof teaches two
    history classes, one in the morning and one in
    the afternoon. Yesterday she gave the same test
    to both classes. Anyone who failed the test must
    take a retest. Since a greater percentage of
    students who took the morning test failed the
    test than students who took the afternoon test,
    more of Orlofs morning history students than
    afternoon history students will have to take the
    retest.
  • The conclusion above is not necessarily valid
    because
  • PHI 103 PHI 103 Week 4
  • DQ 1 As stated in our text book scientists
    design experiments and try to obtain results
    verifying or disproving a hypothesis, but
    philosophers are the driving force in determining
    what factors determine the validity of scientific
    results. (Mosser, 2011). Karl Popper's
    philosophy of science uses modus as the central
    method of disconfirming, or falsifying,
    scientific hypotheses.
  •  

9
PHI 103 expert tutor
  • PHI 103 Week 4 DQ 2
  • PHI 103 Week 4 Quiz (Ash Course)
  • DQ 2
  • Mary is poor. She has not been able to find a job
    and has two children she needs to feed. Assume
    Mary is forced to let her children go hungry or
    steal some food from a local grocery store. Which
    should she do? Construct an argument that
    supports Mary's decision to steal the food or an
    argument that shows why Mary should not steal the
    food. Critique the arguments offered by your
    classmates.
  •  
  • 1. Question A good way to
    establish a conclusion as true, or probable, is
    to
  • 2. Question Logicians regard the
    following as the meaning of the word "argument."
  • 3. Question A strongly supported
    claim in science should be regarded as
  • 4. Question Examining reasons and
    constructing arguments can help in

10
PHI 103 expert tutor
  • PHI 103 Week 5 DQ 1
  • PHI 103 Week 5 DQ 2
  • PHI 103 PHI 103 Week 5
  • DQ 1Write two arguments in English, one in the
    form of modus ponens and one in the form of modus
    tollens. Then, write the arguments in symbols
    using sentence letters and truth-functional
    connective
  •  
  • DQ 2
  • Imagine someone asks you what you have learned in
    your logic class and what you found to be the
    most useful information you learned there. Is it
    important for people to study logic? What kinds
    of mistakes might they make without having been
    exposed to a careful study of reasoning provided
    by logic?

11
PHI 103 expert tutor
  • PHI 103 Week 5 Final Paper Legalized Abortion
    (Ash Course)
  • PHI 103 Week 5 Quiz (Ash Course)
  • Argument Paper
  • For the Final Paper, you will identify a specific
    claim relative to one of the topicslisted before
    and defend it with as strong an argument as
    possible. These topicsare presented below as
    questions. The best way to develop a thesis
    statement isto offer an answer to the question,
    and then state in a clear and specific
    sentencethe basis for your answer
  • 1. Question The sentence "P ? Q"
    is read as
  • 2. Question "P v Q" is best
    interpreted as
  • 3. Question What is the truth
    value of the sentence "P v P"?
  • 4. Question If P is false, and Q
    is false, the truth-value of "P ?Q" is
  • 5. Question "Julie and

12
PHI 103 expert tutor
For more course tutorials visit www.uophelp.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com